• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我报告数据在评估作为老年依赖风险因素的全身和口腔健康方面的有效性:瑞典中部老年人群队列概况

Self-reported data validity for assessment of systemic and oral health as risk for dependency in old age: a cohort profile of elderly individuals in mid Sweden.

作者信息

Neves-Guimaraes Alessandra, Udumyan Ruzan, Jayaprakash Demirel Kartheyaene, Larsson Gran Pernilla, Starkhammar Carin, Källestål Carina

机构信息

Department of Odontological Research, Public Dental Service, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Public Dental Service, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Oral Health. 2025 Mar 6;6:1491723. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1491723. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/froh.2025.1491723
PMID:40115504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11922726/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Mid Sweden Cohort (MSC) was established to investigate self-perceived oral and general health among two groups of aging individuals in two counties (Örebro and Östergötland) in Sweden. For internal and external data validation, we linked collected data on health status, behavior, sociodemographic circumstances, and dependency with national register data from Statistics Sweden and compared non-respondents and those lost to follow-up to respondents.

PARTICIPANTS

MSC is based on a longitudinal multiwave study of aging men and women who answered a cross-sectional questionnaire from MSC: (1) the 1992 cohort including participants aged 50 years in 1992 and (2) the 2007 cohort including participants aged 75 years in 2007. After the baseline surveys, data collection was conducted every 5 years, with the latest wave from 2017 included in our validation. Between 1992 and 2017, 8,879 participants were included in cohort 1, while 5,191 individuals were included in cohort 2 between 2007 and 2017.

RESULTS

After linking self-reported data with national register-based data and analyzing loss to follow-up and non-response numbers, we found that, besides age, factors such as being male, having immigrant status, lower income and education level, being single, and being in poor health were predictors of non-response and loss to follow-up, aligning with the findings of other studies. Based on our results, we conclude the MSC is reliable for further research, provided the observed bias is taken into account.

FUTURE PLANS

Using the MSC, we aim to analyze self-reported oral health changes as a predictor of dependency in the elderly and track oral health status over time. Furthermore, we plan to link data with register-based clinical oral health records. We also intend to add the 2022 wave data and future waves into the existing dataset.

摘要

目的

瑞典中部队列研究(MSC)旨在调查瑞典两个县(厄勒布鲁和东约特兰)两组老年人的自我感知口腔健康和总体健康状况。为了进行内部和外部数据验证,我们将收集的有关健康状况、行为、社会人口统计学情况和依赖性的数据与瑞典统计局的国家登记数据相链接,并将无应答者和失访者与应答者进行比较。

参与者

MSC基于对老年男性和女性的纵向多波研究,这些参与者回答了MSC的横断面问卷:(1)1992年队列,包括1992年年龄为50岁的参与者;(2)2007年队列,包括2007年年龄为75岁的参与者。在基线调查之后,每5年进行一次数据收集,我们的验证纳入了2017年的最新一波数据。1992年至2017年期间,队列1纳入了8879名参与者,而2007年至2017年期间,队列2纳入了5191名个体。

结果

在将自我报告的数据与基于国家登记的数据相链接并分析失访和无应答人数之后,我们发现,除了年龄之外,男性、具有移民身份、收入和教育水平较低、单身以及健康状况较差等因素是无应答和失访的预测因素,这与其他研究的结果一致。基于我们的结果,我们得出结论,只要考虑到观察到的偏差,MSC对于进一步的研究是可靠的。

未来计划

利用MSC,我们旨在分析自我报告的口腔健康变化作为老年人依赖性的预测指标,并随时间跟踪口腔健康状况。此外,我们计划将数据与基于登记的临床口腔健康记录相链接。我们还打算将2022年的一波数据和未来的波次数据添加到现有数据集中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/732e/11922726/dfe2998ab62c/froh-06-1491723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/732e/11922726/dfe2998ab62c/froh-06-1491723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/732e/11922726/dfe2998ab62c/froh-06-1491723-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-reported data validity for assessment of systemic and oral health as risk for dependency in old age: a cohort profile of elderly individuals in mid Sweden.自我报告数据在评估作为老年依赖风险因素的全身和口腔健康方面的有效性:瑞典中部老年人群队列概况
Front Oral Health. 2025 Mar 6;6:1491723. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1491723. eCollection 2025.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Perceived oral health: changes over 5 years in one Swedish age-cohort.口腔健康认知:瑞典一个年龄队列5年期间的变化
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Aug;31(4):292-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00008.x.
4
Self-perceived oral health among 65 and 75 year olds in two Swedish counties.瑞典两个县65岁和75岁人群的自我认知口腔健康状况。
Swed Dent J. 2010;34(2):107-19.
5
Change in Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) with increasing age: testing the evaluative properties of the OIDP frequency inventory using prospective data from Norway and Sweden.随着年龄的增长,口腔健康对日常活动的影响(OIDP)的变化:使用来自挪威和瑞典的前瞻性数据测试 OIDP 频率清单的评估特性。
BMC Oral Health. 2014 May 31;14:59. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-59.
6
Does different wording of a global oral health question provide different results?一个全球口腔健康问题的不同措辞会产生不同的结果吗?
Acta Odontol Scand. 2015 May;73(4):250-7. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.794390. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
7
Self reported poor health and low educational level predictors for mortality: a population based follow up study of 39,156 people in Sweden.自我报告的健康状况不佳和低教育水平作为死亡率的预测因素:一项基于瑞典39156人的人群随访研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Feb;51(1):35-40. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.1.35.
8
Sociodemographic Inequalities in Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults: 15 Years Follow-Up of the 1932 and 1942 Birth Cohorts in Sweden.老年人口腔健康相关生活质量的社会人口学不平等:瑞典1932年和1942年出生队列的15年随访
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;53(2):235-244. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.13029. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
9
Predictors of Non-Response to a Sexual Health Survey in a North American Preconception Cohort Study.预测北美孕前队列研究中对性健康调查无反应的因素。
J Sex Med. 2022 Nov;19(11):1707-1715. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.08.199. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
10
Oral health and self-perceived oral treatment need of adults in Sweden.瑞典成年人的口腔健康与自我认知的口腔治疗需求
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2012(223):10-76.

本文引用的文献

1
Interaction of smoking and social status on the risk of respiratory outcomes in a Swedish adult population: A Nordic Epilung study.吸烟与社会地位对瑞典成年人群呼吸系统结局风险的交互作用:一项北欧 Epilung 研究。
Respir Med. 2023 May;211:107192. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107192. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
2
Determinants of loss to follow-up in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging: a retrospective cohort study.加拿大老龄化纵向研究中失访的决定因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Dec;76(12):1011-1018. doi: 10.1136/jech-2022-219307. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
3
Oral frailty and its determinants in older age: a systematic review.
老年人的口腔脆弱及其决定因素:系统评价。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Aug;2(8):e507-e520. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00143-4.
4
Response Rates in Survey Research.调查研究中的回应率。
J Voice. 2021 Sep;35(5):683-684. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.043. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
5
Association between oral health and frailty: A systematic review of longitudinal studies.口腔健康与虚弱的关系:纵向研究的系统评价。
Gerodontology. 2019 Sep;36(3):205-215. doi: 10.1111/ger.12406. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
6
Sex gap in aging and longevity: can sex chromosomes play a role?性别在衰老和长寿中的差异:性染色体能发挥作用吗?
Biol Sex Differ. 2018 Jul 17;9(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13293-018-0181-y.
7
How to investigate and adjust for selection bias in cohort studies.如何在队列研究中调查和调整选择偏倚。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Apr;97(4):407-416. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13319. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
8
Review of methodologies of cohort studies of older people.老年人队列研究方法学综述。
Age Ageing. 2018 Mar 1;47(2):215-219. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx183.
9
Oral Frailty as a Risk Factor for Physical Frailty and Mortality in Community-Dwelling Elderly.口腔虚弱是社区居住的老年人身体虚弱和死亡的风险因素。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Nov 10;73(12):1661-1667. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx225.
10
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Measures of agreement.统计分析中的常见陷阱:一致性度量
Perspect Clin Res. 2017 Oct-Dec;8(4):187-191. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_123_17.