Liu Song, Wang Xingjin, Hu Jiaqiang, Zhao Chen, Qin Xiaoli
Department of Pharmacy, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jun;27(6):3367-3378. doi: 10.1111/dom.16355. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of siRNA drugs that lower Lp(a) in patients with dyslipidaemia.
A network meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted to compare siRNA drugs targeting Lp(a), based on relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library (up to October 24, 2024). RCTs with an intervention duration of at least 12 weeks were included. Eligible studies compared siRNA drugs that reduce Lp(a), including both Lp(a)-targeted and non-targeted agents, with placebo or other siRNA drugs that reduce Lp(a). The primary outcomes were the percentage reduction and absolute reduction in Lp(a), percentage reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), percentage reduction in apolipoprotein B (apo(B)), adverse events and serious adverse events, including injection-site reactions. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (ROB2), and a random-effects network meta-analysis was performed using the frequentist approach. Confidence in effect estimates was evaluated using the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework.
A total of 14 trials involving 5646 participants were included. Lp(a)-targeted siRNA agents, particularly Olpasiran, demonstrated strong efficacy in significantly reducing Lp(a) levels, with the greatest percentage reduction in Lp(a) (mean difference [MD]: -92.06%; 95% CI: -102.43% to -81.69%; P-score: 0.98). Olpasiran also showed the greatest absolute reduction in Lp(a) (MD: -250.70 nmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -279.89 to -221.50; P-score: 0.99). Certain non-Lp(a)-targeted siRNA agents, such as inclisiran and zodasiran, also showed modest reductions in Lp(a) levels, reducing Lp(a) by approximately 15%. Lp(a)-targeted siRNA agents reduced LDL-C by more than 20% and decreased apo(B) by approximately 15%. In terms of safety, most drugs exhibited favourable safety profiles with no significant differences compared to placebo. However, zerlasiran raised concerns regarding injection-site reactions and other adverse events when compared to placebo.
Lp(a)-targeted siRNA agents have shown robust effectiveness in substantially reducing Lp(a) levels, including both percentage and absolute reductions, with moderate improvements in LDL-C and apo(B) concentrations. Non-Lp(a)-targeted siRNA agents also demonstrate modest reductions in Lp(a) levels. The safety profile is generally favourable, but zerlasiran and inclisiran may increase the incidence of injection-site reactions.
评估降低血脂异常患者脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]的小干扰RNA(siRNA)药物的疗效和安全性。
基于相关随机对照试验(RCT),进行网络荟萃分析和系统评价,以比较靶向Lp(a)的siRNA药物。在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆(截至2024年10月24日)进行全面检索。纳入干预持续时间至少12周的RCT。符合条件的研究比较了降低Lp(a)的siRNA药物(包括靶向Lp(a)和非靶向Lp(a)的药物)与安慰剂或其他降低Lp(a)的siRNA药物。主要结局包括Lp(a)降低的百分比和绝对降低值、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)降低的百分比、载脂蛋白B[apo(B)]降低的百分比、不良事件和严重不良事件(包括注射部位反应)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(ROB2)评估偏倚风险,并采用频率学派方法进行随机效应网络荟萃分析。使用网络荟萃分析可信度(CINeMA)框架评估效应估计值的可信度。
共纳入14项试验,涉及5646名参与者。靶向Lp(a)的siRNA药物,尤其是olpasiran,在显著降低Lp(a)水平方面显示出强大的疗效,Lp(a)降低的百分比最大(平均差值[MD]:-92.06%;95%置信区间[CI]:-102.43%至-81.69%;P值:0.98)。olpasiran还显示出Lp(a)的绝对降低值最大(MD:-250.70 nmol/L;95%置信区间[CI]:-279.89至-221.50;P值:0.99)。某些非靶向Lp(a)的siRNA药物,如inclisiran和zodasiran,也显示出Lp(a)水平有适度降低,Lp(a)降低约15%。靶向Lp(a)的siRNA药物使LDL-C降低超过20%,使apo(B)降低约15%。在安全性方面,大多数药物表现出良好的安全性,与安慰剂相比无显著差异。然而,与安慰剂相比,zerlasiran引发了对注射部位反应和其他不良事件的担忧。
靶向Lp(a)的siRNA药物在大幅降低Lp(a)水平方面显示出强大疗效,包括降低百分比和绝对降低值,同时LDL-C和apo(B)浓度有适度改善。非靶向Lp(a)的siRNA药物也显示出Lp(a)水平有适度降低。安全性总体良好,但zerlasiran和inclisiran可能增加注射部位反应的发生率。