Suppr超能文献

修改后的论述题。

Modified essay question.

作者信息

Stratford P, Pierce-Fenn H

出版信息

Phys Ther. 1985 Jul;65(7):1075-9. doi: 10.1093/ptj/65.7.1075.

Abstract

This article examines the reliability and validity of the modified essay question. An 18-item modified essay question was developed and pretested on a group of clinical experts. After the pretest, the modified essay question was administered to a group of 25 physical therapy students immediately before their second level orthopedic placement. A reliability index of .39 (coefficient alpha) was calculated for the test. In addition, measures of validity were obtained by correlating the modified essay question scores with multiple-choice question scores and the students' in-clinic reasoning scores. The results suggest that the reliability coefficient found in this study is comparable to the medical literature. Also, the results showed that the modified essay question demonstrated a greater correlation with the in-clinic clinical reasoning score compared with the parallel content multiple-choice examination. Furthermore, preliminary evidence suggests that the modified essay question may be a useful paper and pencil tool in evaluating clinical reasoning. Finally, several shortcomings of this study are discussed in conjunction with a direction for further study.

摘要

本文探讨了改进型论述题的信度和效度。编制了一份包含18个项目的改进型论述题,并在一组临床专家中进行了预测试。预测试后,在25名物理治疗专业学生即将进行二级骨科实习前,对他们施测了改进型论述题。计算得出该测试的信度指数为0.39(α系数)。此外,通过将改进型论述题得分与多项选择题得分以及学生的临床推理得分进行相关性分析来获得效度指标。结果表明,本研究中发现的信度系数与医学文献中的相当。而且,结果显示与平行内容的多项选择题考试相比,改进型论述题与临床推理得分的相关性更强。此外,初步证据表明,改进型论述题可能是评估临床推理的一种有用的纸笔工具。最后,结合进一步研究的方向讨论了本研究的几个不足之处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验