• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修改后的论述题的信度和效度研究。

Reliability and validity studies on modified essay questions.

作者信息

Feletti G I

出版信息

J Med Educ. 1980 Nov;55(11):933-41. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198011000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00001888-198011000-00006
PMID:7441674
Abstract

Modified essay questions (MEQs) have been developed at the University of Newcastle to assess clinical problem-solving by first- and second-year medical students. Reliability estimates (given as coefficient alpha [60]) as high as 0.91 were reported for term assessment in 1979 based on MEQs. Lower estimates can be expected as statistical artifacts due to the faculty's criterion-referenced assessment of competence. More appropriate measures of reliability are currently being evaluated. The validity of assessment by MEQ was based on one model of medical problem-solving and another of cognitive skill taxonomies. Internal consistency estimates (coefficient alpha) based on each model yielded some interesting anomalies on the nature of problem-solving which may be reexamined in terms of cognitive preference indexes.

摘要

纽卡斯尔大学开发了改良短文问题(MEQs),用于评估医学专业一、二年级学生的临床问题解决能力。1979年基于MEQs进行的学期评估报告显示,可靠性估计值(以阿尔法系数[60]表示)高达0.91。由于教师对能力的标准参照评估,预计会有较低的估计值作为统计假象。目前正在评估更合适的可靠性测量方法。MEQ评估的有效性基于一种医学问题解决模型和另一种认知技能分类法。基于每个模型的内部一致性估计值(阿尔法系数)在问题解决的性质上产生了一些有趣的异常情况,这些情况可能会根据认知偏好指标进行重新审视。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity studies on modified essay questions.修改后的论述题的信度和效度研究。
J Med Educ. 1980 Nov;55(11):933-41. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198011000-00006.
2
Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper.本科教育中高阶认知技能的评估:改进的论文式题目还是多项选择题?研究论文。
BMC Med Educ. 2007 Nov 28;7:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-49.
3
The cognitive structure of the modified essay question.修改后的论述题的认知结构。
Med Educ. 1982 Nov;16(6):326-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1982.tb00945.x.
4
Modified essay questions: are they worth the effort?改良型论述题:它们值得付出努力吗?
Med Educ. 1986 Mar;20(2):126-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01059.x.
5
How do medical students actually think while solving problems in three different types of clinical assessments in Korea: Clinical performance examination (CPX), multimedia case-based assessment (CBA), and modified essay question (MEQ).在韩国的三种不同类型临床评估(临床技能考试(CPX)、多媒体案例评估(CBA)和改良短文问题(MEQ))中解决问题时,医学生实际上是如何思考的?
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:10. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.10. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Evaluation of Modified Essay Questions (MEQ) and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) as a tool for Assessing the Cognitive Skills of Undergraduate Medical Students.评估改良短文问题(MEQ)和多项选择题(MCQ)作为评估本科医学生认知技能工具的效果。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2011 Jan;5(1):39-43.
7
Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.本科眼科书面评估中选择题(MCQ)与简答题(SEQ)分数的相关性
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Mar;25(3):185-8.
8
Reliability and validity of simulated problems as measures of change in problem-solving skills.
Annu Conf Res Med Educ. 1977;16:305-10.
9
Should essays and other "open-ended"-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine?论文及其他“开放式”问题在临床医学书面总结性评估中是否应保留一席之地?
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Nov 28;14:249. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0249-2.
10
Objective measurement of clinical performance.临床性能的客观测量。
Med Educ. 1985 Jan;19(1):43-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1985.tb01137.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment formats in dental medicine: An overview.牙科医学中的评估形式:概述。
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Aug 15;33(4):Doc65. doi: 10.3205/zma001064. eCollection 2016.
2
Problem-based learning research in anesthesia teaching: current status and future perspective.麻醉教学中基于问题的学习研究:现状与未来展望。
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:263948. doi: 10.1155/2014/263948. Epub 2014 May 29.
3
Evaluation of Modified Essay Questions (MEQ) and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) as a tool for Assessing the Cognitive Skills of Undergraduate Medical Students.
评估改良短文问题(MEQ)和多项选择题(MCQ)作为评估本科医学生认知技能工具的效果。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2011 Jan;5(1):39-43.
4
Family medicine education in Canada, 1983.加拿大的家庭医学教育,1983 年。
Can Fam Physician. 1983 Dec;29:2340-5.