• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪调节灵活性、消极情绪与创伤后应激障碍之间关系的实验研究

An Experimental Investigation of the Relationship Between Emotion Regulation Flexibility, Negative Affect and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

作者信息

Lim Madeleine, Nickerson Angela, Specker Philippa

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia.

出版信息

Cognit Ther Res. 2025;49(2):249-261. doi: 10.1007/s10608-024-10536-3. Epub 2024 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10608-024-10536-3
PMID:40123675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11928379/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Emerging research investigating mechanisms underpinning PTSD has identified emotion regulation (ER) flexibility - the ability to flexibly use ER strategies according to contextual demands - as one promising mechanism. To date, however, no study has investigated whether brief training in ER flexibility can minimise negative affect elicited from evocative stimuli. This study investigated the impact of instructed ER flexibility on emotional responding in probable PTSD.

METHODS

Participants ( 148) viewed images that differed in negative emotional intensity (high or low). For each image, participants followed instructions to adopt either a flexible or inflexible ER approach through randomisation to either an condition or one of three control conditions (, , ). In the condition, participants were instructed to switch between distraction and reappraisal according to the emotional intensity of the image. The control conditions required participants to either employ a single ER strategy ( and ) or switch between strategies in a way that did not align with image intensity (). Negative affect was rated after each image.

RESULTS

Participants with probable PTSD in the condition demonstrated the lowest levels of negative affect. For participants without probable PTSD, negative affect did not differ between the ER conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that individuals with probable PTSD benefitted from being instructed in ER flexibility. This finding supports the adaptiveness of ER flexibility and provides a preliminary temporal link between instructed ER flexibility and improved emotional responding for those with PTSD.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10608-024-10536-3.

摘要

目的

新兴的关于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)潜在机制的研究已将情绪调节(ER)灵活性——根据情境需求灵活运用ER策略的能力——确定为一种有前景的机制。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究调查过ER灵活性的简短训练是否能将唤起性刺激引发的负面影响降至最低。本研究调查了指导性ER灵活性对可能患有PTSD者情绪反应的影响。

方法

148名参与者观看了负面情绪强度不同(高或低)的图像。对于每张图像,参与者通过随机分配到一个灵活性条件组或三个控制条件组之一(、、),按照指示采用灵活或不灵活的ER方法。在灵活性条件组中,参与者被指示根据图像的情绪强度在分心和重新评估之间进行切换。控制条件组要求参与者要么采用单一的ER策略(和),要么以与图像强度不一致的方式在策略之间进行切换()。每张图像后对负面影响进行评分。

结果

灵活性条件组中可能患有PTSD的参与者表现出最低水平的负面影响。对于没有可能患有PTSD的参与者,ER条件组之间的负面影响没有差异。

结论

研究结果表明,可能患有PTSD的个体从ER灵活性指导中受益。这一发现支持了ER灵活性的适应性,并为指导性ER灵活性与PTSD患者情绪反应改善之间提供了初步的时间联系。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10608-024-10536-3获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/11928379/00a24355eca3/10608_2024_10536_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/11928379/74b387c8a578/10608_2024_10536_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/11928379/06bf69fe65b5/10608_2024_10536_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/11928379/00a24355eca3/10608_2024_10536_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/11928379/74b387c8a578/10608_2024_10536_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/11928379/06bf69fe65b5/10608_2024_10536_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58f1/11928379/00a24355eca3/10608_2024_10536_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An Experimental Investigation of the Relationship Between Emotion Regulation Flexibility, Negative Affect and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.情绪调节灵活性、消极情绪与创伤后应激障碍之间关系的实验研究
Cognit Ther Res. 2025;49(2):249-261. doi: 10.1007/s10608-024-10536-3. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
2
Investigating the effectiveness of instructing emotion regulation flexibility to individuals with low and high anxiety.研究指导情绪调节灵活性对低焦虑和高焦虑个体的有效性。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2024 Jan;37(1):143-156. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2023.2205641. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
3
Emotion regulation strategy flexibility in childhood: When do children switch between different strategies?儿童情绪调节策略的灵活性:儿童何时在不同策略之间切换?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jul;183:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
4
Emotion regulation flexibility: EEG/EMG predictors and consequences of switching between reappraisal and distraction strategies.情绪调节灵活性:再评价和分心策略之间切换的 EEG/EMG 预测因子和结果。
Psychophysiology. 2024 Nov;61(11):e14646. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14646. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
5
Reduced emotion regulatory selection flexibility in post-traumatic stress disorder: converging performance-based evidence from two PTSD populations.创伤后应激障碍中情绪调节选择灵活性降低:来自两个 PTSD 人群的基于绩效的趋同证据。
Psychol Med. 2023 May;53(7):2758-2767. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721004670. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
When and How to Regulate: Everyday Emotion-Regulation Strategy Use and Stressor Intensity.何时以及如何调节:日常情绪调节策略的运用与压力源强度
Affect Sci. 2021 Dec 10;3(1):81-92. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00087-1. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Interoceptive attention facilitates emotion regulation strategy use.内感受性注意有助于情绪调节策略的运用。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Jan-Apr;23(1):100336. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100336. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
8
Flexible emotional regulation typology: associations with PTSD symptomology and trait resilience.灵活的情绪调节类型学:与 PTSD 症状学和特质韧性的关联。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 16;12(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01573-4.
9
Divergent effects of instructed and reported emotion regulation strategies on children's memory for emotional information.指令性和报告性情绪调节策略对儿童情绪信息记忆的不同影响。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Dec;33(8):1726-1735. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1598937. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
10
An experimental investigation of spontaneous emotion regulation variability, negative affect, and posttraumatic stress disorder among traumatized refugees.创伤难民中自发情绪调节变异性、消极情绪和创伤后应激障碍的实验研究
Psychol Trauma. 2023 Feb;15(2):219-226. doi: 10.1037/tra0001217. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Flexible emotional regulation typology: associations with PTSD symptomology and trait resilience.灵活的情绪调节类型学:与 PTSD 症状学和特质韧性的关联。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 16;12(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01573-4.
2
Reduced emotion regulatory selection flexibility in post-traumatic stress disorder: converging performance-based evidence from two PTSD populations.创伤后应激障碍中情绪调节选择灵活性降低:来自两个 PTSD 人群的基于绩效的趋同证据。
Psychol Med. 2023 May;53(7):2758-2767. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721004670. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
3
Emotion regulation strategy use in PTSD: A daily life study.
创伤后应激障碍中情绪调节策略的使用:一项日常生活研究。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Oct 1;338:365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.06.023. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
4
Investigating the effectiveness of instructing emotion regulation flexibility to individuals with low and high anxiety.研究指导情绪调节灵活性对低焦虑和高焦虑个体的有效性。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2024 Jan;37(1):143-156. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2023.2205641. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
5
Investigating the associations between cognitive appraisals, emotion regulation and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder among Asian American and European American trauma survivors.调查亚洲裔美国人和欧裔美国创伤幸存者的认知评估、情绪调节与创伤后应激障碍症状之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 28;12(1):18127. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22995-3.
6
(When and how) does basic research in clinical psychology lead to more effective psychological treatment for mental disorders?(何时以及如何)临床心理学的基础研究如何导致更有效的心理治疗精神障碍?
Clin Psychol Rev. 2022 Jul;95:102163. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102163. Epub 2022 May 17.
7
Psychophysiological predictors of change in emotion dysregulation 6 months after traumatic injury.创伤后 6 个月情绪调节障碍变化的心理生理学预测因子。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Mar;173:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
8
Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in the United States: a systematic literature review.美国创伤后应激障碍的患病率:一项系统的文献综述。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Dec;37(12):2151-2161. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1978417. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
9
Is Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) a comparable recruitment source for trauma studies?亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk(MTurk)是否可以作为创伤研究的一种可比较的招募来源?
Psychol Trauma. 2020 May;12(4):381-388. doi: 10.1037/tra0000502. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
A research programme to evaluate DBT-PTSD, a modular treatment approach for Complex PTSD after childhood abuse.一项评估DBT-PTSD的研究计划,这是一种针对童年期虐待后复杂性创伤后应激障碍的模块化治疗方法。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2019 Mar 5;6:7. doi: 10.1186/s40479-019-0099-y. eCollection 2019.