• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Toolkitting: an unrecognized form of expertise for overcoming fragmentation in inter- and transdisciplinarity.工具包法:一种尚未被认识的、用于克服跨学科和多学科碎片化的专业方法。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024;11. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03279-9. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
2
A qualitative study of clinic and community member perspectives on intervention toolkits: "Unless the toolkit is used it won't help solve the problem".一项关于临床医生和社区成员对干预工具包看法的定性研究:“除非使用工具包,否则无助于解决问题”。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 18;17(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2413-y.
3
Even if you build it, they may not come: challenges in the uptake of workplace mental health toolkits.即便搭建好了,人们也未必会用:工作场所心理健康工具包应用面临的挑战。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):2770. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20039-1.
4
Using mixed methods and partnership to develop a program evaluation toolkit for organizations that provide physical activity programs for persons with disabilities.运用混合方法和合作关系,为向残疾人提供体育活动项目的组织开发一个项目评估工具包。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 2;10(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00618-7.
5
Dissemination of the Women-Centred HIV Care Model: A Multimodal Process and Evaluation.以妇女为中心的艾滋病护理模式的传播:一种多模式的过程和评估。
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:23259582231226036. doi: 10.1177/23259582231226036.
6
Priority Populations Toolkits: Enhancing researcher readiness to work with priority populations.重点人群工具包:提高研究人员与重点人群合作的准备程度。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Dec 26;4(1):28-35. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.436. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Quality Improvement Toolkits: Recommendations for Development.质量改进工具包:开发建议
Am J Med Qual. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):538-544. doi: 10.1177/1062860618822102. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS".中国乡村及其可持续未来:欧盟-中国研究项目“SUCCESS”
J Environ Manage. 2008 Apr;87(2):204-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
10
Scoping review of toolkits as a knowledge translation strategy in health.作为健康领域知识转化策略的工具包范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 24;14:121. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0121-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating transdisciplinary methods: a new scale for measuring knowledge integration.评估跨学科方法:一种衡量知识整合的新量表。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2025;12(1):1395. doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05634-w. Epub 2025 Aug 26.
2
Roles of researchers in inter- and transdisciplinary sustainability research: a reflection tool.跨学科和超学科可持续性研究中研究人员的角色:一种反思工具。
Sustain Sci. 2025;20(3):777-792. doi: 10.1007/s11625-024-01619-x. Epub 2025 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Repertoires: A post-Kuhnian perspective on scientific change and collaborative research.全部剧目:库恩之后关于科学变革与合作研究的视角
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2016 Dec;60:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
2
The Team Science Toolkit: enhancing research collaboration through online knowledge sharing.团队科学工具包:通过在线知识共享加强研究合作。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Dec;45(6):787-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.09.001.
3
Integration of specialties: An institutional and organizational view.专业整合:一种机构与组织视角
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2013 Dec;44(4 Pt A):515-24. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 11.

工具包法:一种尚未被认识的、用于克服跨学科和多学科碎片化的专业方法。

Toolkitting: an unrecognized form of expertise for overcoming fragmentation in inter- and transdisciplinarity.

作者信息

Laursen Bethany, Vienni-Baptista Bianca, Bammer Gabriele, Di Giulio Antonietta, Paulsen Theres, Robson-Williams Melissa, Studer Sibylle

机构信息

Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Laursen Evaluation & Design, LLC, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.

出版信息

Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024;11. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03279-9. Epub 2024 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1057/s41599-024-03279-9
PMID:40123700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11928150/
Abstract

A growing number of inter- and transdisciplinary (ITD) toolkits provide methods, processes, concepts, heuristics, frameworks, and other resources for designing and implementing ITD research. A brief overview of the currently fragmented toolkits landscape is provided, fleshed out through descriptions of four toolkits. Fragmentation means that researchers are unaware of, and do not have access to, the full array of tools that could benefit their investigations. Overcoming fragmentation requires attention to toolkitting, which is the relatively overlooked bundle of practices involved in the creation, use, maintenance, funding, and study of toolkits. In particular, the processes and expertise involved in the creation, maintenance, and study of toolkits are described. Toolkitting as metawork can make resources more accessible, useful, and rigorous, enhancing ITD research. Future toolkitting can be strengthened with attention to key questions that can guide the activities of, respectively, toolkit creators and curators, scholars, and funders. Examining the toolkits landscape through the lens of toolkitting suggests that the development of a comprehensive, ongoing inventory is a first step in overcoming toolkit fragmentation. An inventory could also be the foundation for an even bolder initiative-a federated knowledge bank-that connects and develops the range of existing and future toolkits. The inventory and federated knowledge bank also provide a shared project to bring together the expertise of ITD toolkit creators, curators, users, funders, and scholars to achieve a step-change in enhancing ITD research.

摘要

越来越多的跨学科和跨领域(ITD)工具包提供了用于设计和实施ITD研究的方法、流程、概念、启发法、框架及其他资源。本文简要概述了当前零散的工具包格局,并通过对四个工具包的描述进行了充实。零散意味着研究人员不了解且无法获取那些可能有益于其研究的全部工具。克服零散需要关注工具包的创建、使用、维护、资助及研究等一系列相对被忽视的实践活动,即工具包构建。本文特别描述了工具包创建、维护及研究过程中所涉及的流程和专业知识。作为元工作的工具包构建能够使资源更易于获取、更有用且更严谨,从而提升ITD研究水平。未来可通过关注关键问题来强化工具包构建,这些问题能够分别指导工具包创建者与管理者、学者及资助者的活动。从工具包构建的角度审视工具包格局表明,编制一份全面且持续更新的清单是克服工具包零散问题的第一步。这样一份清单还可以成为一项更具魄力的举措——联合知识库的基础,该知识库能够连接并发展现有的和未来的各类工具包。这份清单和联合知识库还提供了一个共享项目,可汇聚ITD工具包创建者、管理者、用户、资助者及学者的专业知识,从而在提升ITD研究方面实现跨越式发展。