Laursen Bethany, Vienni-Baptista Bianca, Bammer Gabriele, Di Giulio Antonietta, Paulsen Theres, Robson-Williams Melissa, Studer Sibylle
Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Laursen Evaluation & Design, LLC, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024;11. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03279-9. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
A growing number of inter- and transdisciplinary (ITD) toolkits provide methods, processes, concepts, heuristics, frameworks, and other resources for designing and implementing ITD research. A brief overview of the currently fragmented toolkits landscape is provided, fleshed out through descriptions of four toolkits. Fragmentation means that researchers are unaware of, and do not have access to, the full array of tools that could benefit their investigations. Overcoming fragmentation requires attention to toolkitting, which is the relatively overlooked bundle of practices involved in the creation, use, maintenance, funding, and study of toolkits. In particular, the processes and expertise involved in the creation, maintenance, and study of toolkits are described. Toolkitting as metawork can make resources more accessible, useful, and rigorous, enhancing ITD research. Future toolkitting can be strengthened with attention to key questions that can guide the activities of, respectively, toolkit creators and curators, scholars, and funders. Examining the toolkits landscape through the lens of toolkitting suggests that the development of a comprehensive, ongoing inventory is a first step in overcoming toolkit fragmentation. An inventory could also be the foundation for an even bolder initiative-a federated knowledge bank-that connects and develops the range of existing and future toolkits. The inventory and federated knowledge bank also provide a shared project to bring together the expertise of ITD toolkit creators, curators, users, funders, and scholars to achieve a step-change in enhancing ITD research.
越来越多的跨学科和跨领域(ITD)工具包提供了用于设计和实施ITD研究的方法、流程、概念、启发法、框架及其他资源。本文简要概述了当前零散的工具包格局,并通过对四个工具包的描述进行了充实。零散意味着研究人员不了解且无法获取那些可能有益于其研究的全部工具。克服零散需要关注工具包的创建、使用、维护、资助及研究等一系列相对被忽视的实践活动,即工具包构建。本文特别描述了工具包创建、维护及研究过程中所涉及的流程和专业知识。作为元工作的工具包构建能够使资源更易于获取、更有用且更严谨,从而提升ITD研究水平。未来可通过关注关键问题来强化工具包构建,这些问题能够分别指导工具包创建者与管理者、学者及资助者的活动。从工具包构建的角度审视工具包格局表明,编制一份全面且持续更新的清单是克服工具包零散问题的第一步。这样一份清单还可以成为一项更具魄力的举措——联合知识库的基础,该知识库能够连接并发展现有的和未来的各类工具包。这份清单和联合知识库还提供了一个共享项目,可汇聚ITD工具包创建者、管理者、用户、资助者及学者的专业知识,从而在提升ITD研究方面实现跨越式发展。