Nakamoto Daisuke, Piao Yi, Mizutani Hajime, LoPresti Michael, Chikamura Yunosuke, Makhija Dilip, Kwon Kyung Min, Zagorski Jamie, Jinushi Masahisa, Eguchi Yuichiro
Gilead Sciences K.K, Tokyo, Japan.
INTAGE Healthcare Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):524-534. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2025.2483572. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
This study was performed to evaluate patients' and physicians' preferences regarding hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in Japan, particularly focusing on direct-acting antivirals. Understanding these preferences is important for maintaining adherence to treatment necessary for achieving HCV elimination.
A discrete choice experiment was conducted to identify patients' and physicians' preferences for HCV treatment in Japan. Eligible participants completed a preference survey an online questionnaire. Eight attributes and their respective levels - pertaining to dosing regimen/schedule, safety, and out-of-pocket costs - were identified. The primary and secondary endpoints were the relative attribute importance (RAI) and utility value of attribute levels, which were compared between patients and physicians to highlight differences.
Both patients ( = 95) and physicians ( = 118) showed the greatest concern for total out-of-pocket treatment costs, followed by safety risks. While patients and physicians generally shared similar treatment preferences, patients placed a higher RAI on total out-of-pocket costs than did physicians (50.4% vs. 39.4%). Conversely, patients assigned lower RAI values to the risks of nasopharyngitis and pruritus (15.2% vs. 17.9% and 11.7% vs. 16.2%, respectively). The RAI for the number of tablets taken daily was higher than that for treatment duration among patients (11.6% vs. 0.2%), but nearly equal among physicians.
The study had potential non-response bias, physicians not being actual care providers for surveyed patients, a small sample size, reliance on predefined DCE attributes, and limited participant diversity from online panels.
This study highlights the importance of patient-centered care in HCV treatment and the need to raise awareness of the public subsidy for hepatitis, and to ensure an effective access scheme for the patients. Simplifying regimens like once-daily pills and minimal monitoring may enhance treatment convenience. Improved patient-physician communication supports optimized strategies, aiding Japan's goal of HCV elimination by 2030.
本研究旨在评估日本患者和医生对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗的偏好,尤其关注直接作用抗病毒药物。了解这些偏好对于维持实现消除HCV所需治疗的依从性很重要。
进行了一项离散选择实验,以确定日本患者和医生对HCV治疗的偏好。符合条件的参与者完成了一项偏好调查——一份在线问卷。确定了八个属性及其各自的水平——与给药方案/时间表、安全性和自付费用有关。主要和次要终点是属性水平的相对属性重要性(RAI)和效用值,对患者和医生进行比较以突出差异。
患者(n = 95)和医生(n = 118)都最关注自付治疗总费用,其次是安全风险。虽然患者和医生总体上有相似的治疗偏好,但患者对自付总费用的RAI高于医生(50.4%对39.4%)。相反,患者对鼻咽炎和瘙痒风险的RAI值较低(分别为15.2%对17.9%和11.7%对16.2%)。患者中每日服药片数的RAI高于治疗持续时间(11.6%对0.2%),但医生中两者几乎相等。
该研究存在潜在的无应答偏倚、医生并非被调查患者的实际护理提供者、样本量小、依赖预定义的DCE属性以及在线小组的参与者多样性有限。
本研究强调了以患者为中心的护理在HCV治疗中的重要性,以及提高公众对肝炎补贴的认识和确保患者有效获取方案的必要性。简化方案,如每日一次服药和最小化监测,可能会提高治疗便利性。改善患者与医生的沟通有助于优化策略,助力日本在2030年实现消除HCV的目标。