Forster Catherine S, Wood Alexis C, Davis-Rodriguez Stephanie, Desai Sanyukta, Chang Pearl W, Tchou Michael J, Morrison John M, Hamdy Rana F, Vemulakonda Vijaya, Brady Patrick W, Abou Zeid Cynthia, Wallace Sowdhamini S
Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
USDA/ARS Children's Research Nutrition Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Hosp Pediatr. 2025 Apr 1;15(4):309-317. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2024-007914.
In children with urinary tract anomalies, febrile urinary tract infections (UTIs) are associated with increased risks of sepsis, hospitalization, and kidney injury. However, the best treatment strategies are unknown. We aimed to describe antibiotic treatment practices and outcomes for UTIs in children with urinary tract anomalies and evaluate whether variability in UTI treatment exists between hospitals.
We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of children seen in emergency departments (EDs) in 6 free-standing US children's hospitals from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2018. We included children aged 0-17 years with an anatomic or functional urinary tract anomaly and a physician diagnosis of febrile or hypothermic UTI. Outcomes included intravenous (IV) antibiotic administration practices, hospitalization rates, length of stay, and return ED visits. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were performed, adjusting for differences in patient and illness characteristics.
Among the 510 children included, anomaly types, presence of home catheterization regimens, and baseline glomerular filtration rates varied between sites. In the adjusted analyses, sites differed in several treatment practices: IV antibiotic administration before ED discharge (P = .007), IV antibiotic spectrum (P = .003), IV antibiotic duration (P < .001), and hospital length of stay (P < .001). No statistically significant differences existed with bacteremia (P = .24) or intensive care stays (P = .08). Returns to the ED within 30 days did not significantly differ by site (P = .68).
Children's hospitals vary in their treatment of UTIs in children with urinary tract anomalies, yet ED revisits are similar across sites, highlighting the opportunity to promote high-value care in treatment of UTIs in this population.
在患有尿路异常的儿童中,发热性尿路感染(UTI)与败血症、住院和肾损伤风险增加相关。然而,最佳治疗策略尚不清楚。我们旨在描述尿路异常儿童UTI的抗生素治疗方法和结果,并评估医院之间UTI治疗是否存在差异。
我们对2017年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间在美国6家独立儿童医院急诊科就诊的儿童进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了年龄在0至17岁之间、患有解剖学或功能性尿路异常且经医生诊断为发热性或体温过低性UTI的儿童。结果包括静脉注射(IV)抗生素的使用方法、住院率、住院时间和再次急诊就诊情况。进行了多变量逻辑回归和线性回归分析,并对患者和疾病特征的差异进行了调整。
在纳入的510名儿童中,各研究地点的异常类型、家庭导管插入术方案的存在情况以及基线肾小球滤过率各不相同。在调整分析中,各研究地点在几种治疗方法上存在差异:急诊出院前静脉注射抗生素(P = 0.007)、静脉注射抗生素谱(P = 0.003)、静脉注射抗生素持续时间(P < 0.001)和住院时间(P < 0.001)。菌血症(P = 0.24)或重症监护病房住院时间(P = 0.08)无统计学显著差异。各研究地点在30天内再次急诊就诊情况无显著差异(P = 0.68)。
儿童医院对尿路异常儿童的UTI治疗存在差异,但各研究地点的急诊再就诊情况相似,这突出了在该人群UTI治疗中推广高价值医疗的机会。