• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与随机临床试验PaCUDAHL的医生的患者中,宫颈癌筛查的参与情况未因霍桑效应而改变。

The participation in cervical cancer screening is not altered by the Hawthorne effect among patients of doctors participating in the randomized clinical trial PaCUDAHL.

作者信息

Lisembard Gabrielle, Rochoy Michaël, Quersin François, Deken Valérie, Duhamel Alain, Descamps Axel, Berkhout Christophe, Serman Fanny

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, School of Medicine, Lille University, Lille, France.

ULR 2694 - METRICS, University Hospital Lille, Lille University, Lille, France.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2025 Mar 24;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07186-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-025-07186-3
PMID:40128850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11934682/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The PaCUDAHL randomized clinical trial evaluated an HPV self-sampling device provided by the family doctor to female patients not participating in the usual opportunistic cervical screening program from 2016 to 2019. Reliable data on the Hawthorne (observer) effect (HE) in clinical trials were lacking. This nested study aimed to verify whether there was a significant difference between participating and non-participating general practitioners (GPs) in the trial, and to measure whether there was an HE in the female patients of participating GPs.

RESULTS

We carried out an analytical retrospective cohort study involving 332 GPs and their 70,983 female patients, aged 25-65, registered with the Health Insurance Fund of Flanders, using claims database for the three-year periods 2012-2015 and 2016-2019. Statistical analyses were performed using a linear generalized hierarchical mixed model with geographic level as a random effect. The patients of the 24 participating GPs did not have a cervical cancer screening rate different from that of the non-participating GPs, either before recruitment (p = 0.24) or during the PaCUDAHL trial period (p = 0.15). There were significant increases in cervical cancer screening rates over four years regardless of the group considered (p < 0.0001). In conclusion there was no observer effect but a significant cohort effect.

摘要

目的

帕库达尔随机临床试验评估了家庭医生向2016年至2019年未参加常规机会性宫颈筛查项目的女性患者提供的一种人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自检装置。临床试验中缺乏关于霍桑(观察者)效应(HE)的可靠数据。这项嵌套研究旨在验证参与试验和未参与试验的全科医生(GP)之间是否存在显著差异,并衡量参与试验的全科医生的女性患者中是否存在霍桑效应。

结果

我们进行了一项分析性回顾性队列研究,涉及332名全科医生及其在弗拉芒健康保险基金注册的70983名年龄在25至65岁之间的女性患者,使用了2012 - 2015年和2016 - 2019年这两个三年期的理赔数据库。使用以地理区域为随机效应的线性广义分层混合模型进行统计分析。在招募前(p = 0.24)或帕库达尔试验期间(p = 0.15),24名参与试验的全科医生的患者宫颈癌筛查率与未参与试验的全科医生的患者相比没有差异。无论考虑哪个组,四年内宫颈癌筛查率都有显著提高(p < 0.0001)。总之,不存在观察者效应,但存在显著的队列效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5869/11934682/cc293ca7d0a9/13104_2025_7186_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5869/11934682/cc293ca7d0a9/13104_2025_7186_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5869/11934682/cc293ca7d0a9/13104_2025_7186_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The participation in cervical cancer screening is not altered by the Hawthorne effect among patients of doctors participating in the randomized clinical trial PaCUDAHL.参与随机临床试验PaCUDAHL的医生的患者中,宫颈癌筛查的参与情况未因霍桑效应而改变。
BMC Res Notes. 2025 Mar 24;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07186-3.
2
The Effect of Cervical Smears Performed by General Practitioners on the Cervical Cancer Screening Rate of their Female Patients: A Claim Database Analysis and Cross-Sectional Survey.《初级保健医生实施宫颈抹片检查对女性患者宫颈癌筛查率的影响:一项理赔数据库分析和横断面调查》
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jul;27(7):933-938. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6656. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
3
Factors associated with the achievement of cervical smears by general practitioners.全科医生完成宫颈涂片检查的相关因素。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 8;10(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2999-5.
4
General Practitioners' Needs and Preferences Regarding the Provision of Self-sampling Tests for Cervical Cancer Screening in Flanders, Belgium.比利时弗拉芒地区全科医生对提供宫颈癌筛查自我采样检测的需求和偏好
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251320178. doi: 10.1177/21501319251320178. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
5
The ESSAG-trial protocol: A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of offering a self-sampling kit by the GP to reach women underscreened in the routine cervical cancer screening program.ESSAG试验方案:一项随机对照试验,评估全科医生提供自我采样试剂盒对在常规宫颈癌筛查项目中筛查不足的女性的有效性。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Sep;144:107617. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107617. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
6
An outreach strategy to increase uptake of vaginal self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in older French women: The RIDECA interventional research protocol.一项旨在提高法国老年女性接受阴道自我采样宫颈癌筛查的外展策略:RIDECA 干预性研究方案。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241292693. doi: 10.1177/17455057241292693.
7
Comparison of two invitation-based methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling with usual care among un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women: study protocol for a randomised controlled community trial to examine the effect of self-sampling on participation in cervical-cancer screening.基于两种邀请方式的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我采样与常规护理比较:在未筛查和筛查不足的毛利人、太平洋岛民和亚裔妇女中的研究方案:一项随机对照社区试验,旨在检验自我采样对宫颈癌筛查参与度的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Dec 9;19(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6401-y.
8
Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists.社会不平等与宫颈癌筛查:法国全科医生和妇科医生的离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 27;20(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05479-w.
9
A randomized, controlled trial of two strategies of offering the home-based HPV self-sampling test to non- participants in the Flemish cervical cancer screening program.一项关于向弗拉芒宫颈癌筛查计划中未参与者提供基于家庭的 HPV 自我采样检测的两种策略的随机对照试验。
Int J Cancer. 2018 Aug 15;143(4):861-868. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31391. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
10
Study protocol of the CHOiCE trial: a three-armed, randomized, controlled trial of home-based HPV self-sampling for non-participants in an organized cervical cancer screening program.CHOiCE试验方案:一项针对未参加有组织宫颈癌筛查项目者的基于家庭的HPV自我采样的三臂随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2859-z.

本文引用的文献

1
HPV and Cervical Cancer: A Review of Epidemiology and Screening Uptake in the UK.人乳头瘤病毒与宫颈癌:英国流行病学及筛查情况综述
Pathogens. 2023 Feb 11;12(2):298. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12020298.
2
Defining and evaluating the Hawthorne effect in primary care, a systematic review and meta-analysis.界定与评估初级保健中的霍桑效应:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 8;9:1033486. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1033486. eCollection 2022.
3
Participation rate in cervical cancer screening in general practice related to the proximity of gynecology care facilities: A 3 year follow-up cohort study.
初级保健中宫颈癌筛查的参与率与妇科保健设施的接近程度有关:一项为期 3 年的随访队列研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;10:955559. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.955559. eCollection 2022.
4
The association between cervical cancer screening participation and the deprivation index of the location of the family doctor's office.宫颈癌筛查参与度与家庭医生办公室所在地贫困指数之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2020 May 15;15(5):e0232814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232814. eCollection 2020.
5
Factors associated with the achievement of cervical smears by general practitioners.全科医生完成宫颈涂片检查的相关因素。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 8;10(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2999-5.
6
Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.宫颈癌教育及医疗服务提供者的筛查建议对筛查率的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0183924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183924. eCollection 2017.
7
Development of a cross-cultural deprivation index in five European countries.五个欧洲国家跨文化剥夺指数的编制
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 May;70(5):493-9. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-205729. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
8
Understanding the Hawthorne effect.理解霍桑效应。
BMJ. 2015 Sep 4;351:h4672. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4672.
9
Obstacles to the uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screenings: what remains to be achieved by French national programmes?乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查推广的障碍:法国国家计划仍需实现哪些目标?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 4;14:465. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-465.
10
Predictors of cervical cancer screening adherence in the United States: a systematic review.美国宫颈癌筛查依从性的预测因素:一项系统综述。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2014 Jan;5(1):31-41.