Suppr超能文献

参与随机临床试验PaCUDAHL的医生的患者中,宫颈癌筛查的参与情况未因霍桑效应而改变。

The participation in cervical cancer screening is not altered by the Hawthorne effect among patients of doctors participating in the randomized clinical trial PaCUDAHL.

作者信息

Lisembard Gabrielle, Rochoy Michaël, Quersin François, Deken Valérie, Duhamel Alain, Descamps Axel, Berkhout Christophe, Serman Fanny

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, School of Medicine, Lille University, Lille, France.

ULR 2694 - METRICS, University Hospital Lille, Lille University, Lille, France.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2025 Mar 24;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07186-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The PaCUDAHL randomized clinical trial evaluated an HPV self-sampling device provided by the family doctor to female patients not participating in the usual opportunistic cervical screening program from 2016 to 2019. Reliable data on the Hawthorne (observer) effect (HE) in clinical trials were lacking. This nested study aimed to verify whether there was a significant difference between participating and non-participating general practitioners (GPs) in the trial, and to measure whether there was an HE in the female patients of participating GPs.

RESULTS

We carried out an analytical retrospective cohort study involving 332 GPs and their 70,983 female patients, aged 25-65, registered with the Health Insurance Fund of Flanders, using claims database for the three-year periods 2012-2015 and 2016-2019. Statistical analyses were performed using a linear generalized hierarchical mixed model with geographic level as a random effect. The patients of the 24 participating GPs did not have a cervical cancer screening rate different from that of the non-participating GPs, either before recruitment (p = 0.24) or during the PaCUDAHL trial period (p = 0.15). There were significant increases in cervical cancer screening rates over four years regardless of the group considered (p < 0.0001). In conclusion there was no observer effect but a significant cohort effect.

摘要

目的

帕库达尔随机临床试验评估了家庭医生向2016年至2019年未参加常规机会性宫颈筛查项目的女性患者提供的一种人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自检装置。临床试验中缺乏关于霍桑(观察者)效应(HE)的可靠数据。这项嵌套研究旨在验证参与试验和未参与试验的全科医生(GP)之间是否存在显著差异,并衡量参与试验的全科医生的女性患者中是否存在霍桑效应。

结果

我们进行了一项分析性回顾性队列研究,涉及332名全科医生及其在弗拉芒健康保险基金注册的70983名年龄在25至65岁之间的女性患者,使用了2012 - 2015年和2016 - 2019年这两个三年期的理赔数据库。使用以地理区域为随机效应的线性广义分层混合模型进行统计分析。在招募前(p = 0.24)或帕库达尔试验期间(p = 0.15),24名参与试验的全科医生的患者宫颈癌筛查率与未参与试验的全科医生的患者相比没有差异。无论考虑哪个组,四年内宫颈癌筛查率都有显著提高(p < 0.0001)。总之,不存在观察者效应,但存在显著的队列效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5869/11934682/cc293ca7d0a9/13104_2025_7186_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验