de Sire Alessandro, Marotta Nicola, Prestifilippo Emanuele, Parente Andrea, Lippi Lorenzo, Invernizzi Marco, Longo Umile Giuseppe, Ammendolia Antonio
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia", 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Research Center on Musculoskeletal Health, MusculoSkeletalHealth@UMG, Catanzaro, Italy.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2025 Jul;38(4):674-699. doi: 10.1177/10538127251314711. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
IntroductionFrom a rehabilitation perspective, various approaches can be applied to help athletes overcome injury, including drugs, physical agent modalities (PAMs) with conventional physical therapy. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of physical agent modalities (PAMs) for pain relief in injured athletes.MethodsPubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception until May 8, 2024. The papers were considered eligible for review in compliance with the conditions determined by the following PICO model: P) Participants: injured athletes; I) Intervention: magnetic therapy, TENS, lasertherapy, ultrasound therapy, diathermy, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT); C) Comparator: NA; O) Outcome measure: any pain assessment. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024532304ResultsStudy selection reported a total of 785 records, resulting in 484 articles after duplicate removal. After the title and abstract screening, 433 papers were excluded and 51 articles were evaluated for eligibility. Therefore, 21 studies were included, involving a total of 806 subjects: 10 ESWT, 1 Cryotherapy, 2 Cryo + ultrasound, 3 diathermy, 1 NMES, 1 TENS, 2 Laser therapy, 1 combined procedure.ConclusionsThe systematic review indicated potential effectiveness of PAMs in managing and reducing pain in sport-related injuries. Taken together, our findings suggested a positive role of ESWT in term of pain relief, also considering that these PAMs are the most used in these subjects. However, the high heterogeneity of the results could not consent to define the specific effect of the single PAMs.
引言
从康复的角度来看,可以采用多种方法来帮助运动员克服伤病,包括药物治疗以及结合传统物理治疗的物理因子治疗(PAMs)。本系统评价旨在评估物理因子治疗(PAMs)对受伤运动员疼痛缓解的影响。
方法
对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science进行系统检索,检索时间从数据库建立至2024年5月8日。根据以下PICO模型确定的条件,符合条件的论文被纳入综述:P)参与者:受伤运动员;I)干预措施:磁疗、经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)、激光疗法、超声疗法、透热疗法和体外冲击波疗法(ESWT);C)对照:无;O)结局指标:任何疼痛评估。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024532304
结果
研究筛选共报告了785条记录,去除重复记录后得到484篇文章。经过标题和摘要筛选,排除了433篇论文,对51篇文章进行了资格评估。因此,纳入了21项研究,共涉及806名受试者:10项体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)、1项冷冻疗法、2项冷冻疗法+超声疗法、3项透热疗法、1项神经肌肉电刺激疗法(NMES)、1项经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)、2项激光疗法、1项联合治疗。
结论
本系统评价表明物理因子治疗(PAMs)在管理和减轻运动相关损伤疼痛方面具有潜在效果。综合来看,我们的研究结果表明体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)在缓解疼痛方面具有积极作用,同时考虑到这些物理因子治疗(PAMs)是这些受试者中最常用的。然而,结果的高度异质性使得无法确定单一物理因子治疗(PAMs)的具体效果。