• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于正念的多成分照护者干预措施(PAACC):目标、研究设计及队列描述。

A mindfulness-based multicomponent caregiver intervention (PAACC): objectives, study design, and cohort description.

作者信息

Sapra Mamta, Hagemann Lauren, Luci Katherine, Savla Jyoti

机构信息

Center for Aging and Neurocognitive Services Salem Veteran Affairs Medical Center Salem Virginia USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine Roanoke Virginia USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Mar 24;11(1):e70064. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70064. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.1002/trc2.70064
PMID:40129751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11931665/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Effective interventions are needed to reduce caregiver burden and stress, particularly among family caregivers of veterans with dementia. Unique risk factors such as traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) further complicate caregiving. This study compares a four-session mindfulness-based multicomponent intervention (PAACC) with a cognitive behavioral intervention (REACH), both designed to alleviate caregiver burden, and provides a baseline evaluation of caregivers in the intervention. A two-arm, blinded, randomized controlled trial assigned 133 dementia caregivers to PAACC ( = 67) or REACH ( = 66). Baseline assessments included caregiver stress, burden, mindfulness receptivity, rumination, compassion, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and care recipient behavior. Participants averaged 67.17 years, 85% were women, and 70% were spousal caregivers. Caregivers in PAACC reported higher depressive symptoms and anxiety and lower mindfulness receptivity. This study introduces the first mindfulness-based intervention for veteran caregivers, designed to enhance cognitive flexibility, cultivate compassion, and provide practical skills to improve quality of life.

METHODS

The study utilized a two-arm, blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial to compare the PAACC and REACH interventions. A total of 133 dementia caregivers experiencing moderate to severe caregiver burden were assigned to receive either the PAACC intervention ( = 67) or the REACH intervention ( = 66). Baseline evaluations included caregiver stress, burden, mindfulness receptivity, rumination, compassion, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and the memory and behavior problems of the veteran living with dementia, using widely accepted measures from caregiving literature.

RESULTS

Baseline assessments were conducted on 133 family caregivers of veterans living with dementia. The average caregiver age was 67.17 years (SD = 9.8), 85% were women, and 70% were spousal caregivers. No significant demographic differences were found between the two intervention groups. However, baseline comparisons showed that caregivers in the PAACC intervention reported higher depressive symptoms and anxiety, and lower mindfulness receptivity. A detailed protocol for the mindfulness-based multicomponent caregiver intervention PAACC is described.

DISCUSSION

There is a growing need for multicomponent, skill-building interventions tailored for dementia caregivers who are at high risk of stress. This study introduces the first mindfulness-based intervention specifically for caregivers of veterans, designed to enhance cognitive flexibility, cultivate compassion, and equip caregivers with practical skills to improve their quality of life.

HIGHLIGHTS

PAACC is a mindfulness-based multicomponent intervention for dementia caregivers of veterans.No demographic differences suggest psychological differences are not due to demographics.Baseline mental health and mindfulness readiness may impact intervention effectiveness.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bace/11931665/4c92051d1c84/TRC2-11-e70064-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bace/11931665/4c92051d1c84/TRC2-11-e70064-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bace/11931665/4c92051d1c84/TRC2-11-e70064-g001.jpg
摘要

引言

需要有效的干预措施来减轻照料者的负担和压力,尤其是老年痴呆症退伍军人的家庭照料者。诸如创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)等独特的风险因素使照料工作更加复杂。本研究比较了一个为期四节的基于正念的多成分干预(PAACC)和一个认知行为干预(REACH),二者均旨在减轻照料者负担,并对干预中的照料者进行了基线评估。一项双臂、盲法、随机对照试验将133名痴呆症照料者分配到PAACC组(n = 67)或REACH组(n = 66)。基线评估包括照料者的压力、负担、正念接受度、沉思、同情心、抑郁症状、焦虑以及受照料者的行为。参与者平均年龄为67.17岁,85%为女性,70%为配偶照料者。PAACC组的照料者报告有更高的抑郁症状和焦虑,以及更低的正念接受度。本研究介绍了首个针对退伍军人照料者的基于正念的干预措施,旨在提高认知灵活性、培养同情心,并提供实用技能以改善生活质量。

方法

本研究采用双臂、盲法、前瞻性随机对照试验来比较PAACC和REACH干预措施。共有133名经历中度至重度照料者负担的痴呆症照料者被分配接受PAACC干预(n = 67)或REACH干预(n = 66)。基线评估包括照料者的压力、负担、正念接受度、沉思、同情心、抑郁症状、焦虑,以及使用照料文献中广泛接受的测量方法对患有痴呆症的退伍军人的记忆和行为问题进行评估。

结果

对133名患有痴呆症的退伍军人的家庭照料者进行了基线评估。照料者的平均年龄为67.17岁(标准差 = 9.8),85%为女性,70%为配偶照料者。两个干预组之间未发现显著的人口统计学差异。然而,基线比较显示,PAACC干预组的照料者报告有更高的抑郁症状和焦虑,以及更低的正念接受度。描述了基于正念的多成分照料者干预措施PAACC的详细方案。

讨论

对于压力风险较高的痴呆症照料者,越来越需要多成分、培养技能的干预措施。本研究介绍了首个专门针对退伍军人照料者的基于正念的干预措施,旨在提高认知灵活性、培养同情心,并为照料者提供实用技能以改善他们的生活质量。

要点

PAACC是一项针对退伍军人痴呆症照料者的基于正念的多成分干预措施。没有人口统计学差异表明心理差异不是由人口统计学因素导致的。基线心理健康和正念准备情况可能会影响干预效果。

相似文献

1
A mindfulness-based multicomponent caregiver intervention (PAACC): objectives, study design, and cohort description.一项基于正念的多成分照护者干预措施(PAACC):目标、研究设计及队列描述。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Mar 24;11(1):e70064. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70064. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
Multicomponent Intervention for Distressed Informal Caregivers of People With Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对痴呆症患者痛苦的非正式照料者的多成分干预:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250069. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0069.
3
Effect of a single-session mindfulness-based intervention for reducing stress in family caregivers of people with dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.正念干预对减少痴呆患者家庭照顾者压力的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 21;12(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02027-7.
4
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
5
Intervention for the Management of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms to Reduce Caregiver Stress: Protocol for the Mindful and Self-Compassion Care Intervention for Caregivers of Persons Living With Dementia.干预神经精神症状以减轻照料者压力:针对痴呆症患者照料者的正念和自我关怀干预的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 11;13:e58356. doi: 10.2196/58356.
6
Multiphase optimization of a multicomponent intervention for informal dementia caregivers: a study protocol.多组分干预措施的多阶段优化:为非正式痴呆症照顾者提供的干预措施:研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Dec 5;24(1):791. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07801-3.
7
Caregiver burden, mental health, quality of life and self-efficacy of family caregivers of persons with dementia in Malaysia: baseline results of a psychoeducational intervention study.马来西亚痴呆症患者照顾者的负担、心理健康、生活质量和自我效能感:一项心理教育干预研究的基线结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05221-9.
8
Supporting caregivers of veterans with Alzheimer's disease and traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.支持患有老年痴呆症和创伤性脑损伤的退伍军人的护理人员:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Apr 19;21(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4199-1.
9
Effects of a modified mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for family caregivers of people with dementia: A pilot randomized controlled trial.基于正念的认知疗法对痴呆患者家属的影响:一项试点随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Oct;98:107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
Relationship of Psychological Flexibility and Mindfulness to Caregiver Burden, and Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Caregivers of People with Dementia.心理灵活性和正念与痴呆症患者照顾者的负担、抑郁和焦虑症状的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(5):4232. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054232.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Population Attributable Risk of Dementia Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury in Civilians and Veterans.平民和退伍军人创伤性脑损伤相关痴呆的系统评价、荟萃分析和人群归因风险。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Apr;40(7-8):620-634. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0041. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
2
Getting back or giving back: understanding caregiver motivations and willingness to provide informal care.回报还是付出:理解照料者提供非正式照料的动机和意愿。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021 Jul 13;9(1):636-661. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.1951737. eCollection 2021.
3
Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review.
正念干预:全面综述。
Br Med Bull. 2021 Jun 10;138(1):41-57. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldab005.
4
Demographic, Health, and Exposure Risks Associated With Cognitive Loss, Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias in US Military Veterans.美国退伍军人中与认知能力丧失、阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症相关的人口统计学、健康和暴露风险
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 25;12:610334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.610334. eCollection 2021.
5
How Effective Are Dementia Caregiver Interventions? An Updated Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.痴呆症照料者干预措施的效果如何?一项更新的综合荟萃分析。
Gerontologist. 2020 Nov 23;60(8):609-619. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz118.
6
A Systematic Review of Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia and Caregivers.基于正念的干预措施对轻度认知障碍或痴呆患者及照护者的系统评价。
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2021 Nov;34(6):528-554. doi: 10.1177/0891988720957104. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
The Effectiveness of Mindfulness- and Acceptance-Based Interventions for Informal Caregivers of People With Dementia: A Meta-Analysis.正念和接纳为基础的干预措施对痴呆患者非专业照护者的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jul 16;59(4):e363-e379. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny024.
8
Mindfulness training for psychological stress in family caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者心理压力的正念训练:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Interv Aging. 2017 Sep 22;12:1521-1529. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S146213. eCollection 2017.
9
Dementia Caregiver Burden: a Research Update and Critical Analysis.痴呆症照料者负担:研究进展与批判性分析
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017 Aug 10;19(9):64. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0818-2.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) in Outpatients with Anxiety and Mood Disorders.广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7(GAD-7)在焦虑和情绪障碍门诊患者中的心理测量特性。
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2017 Mar;39(1):140-146. doi: 10.1007/s10862-016-9571-9. Epub 2016 Sep 10.