Pan Hongyu, Ruan Minghao, Jin Riming, Zhang Jin, Li Yao, Wu Dong, Zhang Lijie, Sun Wen, Wang Ruoyu
The First Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
The Department of Information, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Front Oncol. 2025 Mar 10;15:1385304. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1385304. eCollection 2025.
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based systemic therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with promising efficacy. However, whether the addition of TACE to the combination of ICI and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (ICI+TKI+TACE) is superior to ICI+TKI combination therapy is still not clear. Thus, this study compares the efficacy of ICI+TKI+TACE triple therapy and ICI+TKI doublet therapy in patients with uHCC.
uHCC patients treated with either ICI+TKI+TACE triple therapy or ICI+TKI doublet therapy were retrospectively recruited between January 2016 and December 2021 at Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital. The patients from ICI+TKI+TACE group and ICI+TKI group were further subjected to propensity score matching (PSM). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). Post-progression survival (PPS) as well as treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also assessed.
A total of 120 patients were matched. The median PFS was 8.4 months in ICI+TKI+TACE triple therapy group versus 6.6 months in ICI+TKI doublet therapy group (HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.48-1.08; =0.115). Similar results were obtained in term of OS (26.9 versus 24.2 months, HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.51-1.52; =0.670). The ORR in the triple therapy group was comparable with that in the doublet therapy group (16.6% versus 21.6%, =0.487). Further subgroup analysis for PFS illustrated that patients without previous locoregional treatment (preLRT) (10.5 versus 3.7 months, HR 0.35 [0.16-0.76]; =0.009), without previous treatment (10.5 versus 3.5 months, HR 0.34 [0.14-0.81]; =0.015) or treated with lenvatinib (14.8 versus 6.9 months, HR 0.52 [0.31-0.87]; =0.013) can significantly benefit from triple therapy compared with doublet therapy. A remarkable interaction between treatment and preLRT (=0.049) or TKIs-combined (=0.005) was also detected in term of PFS. Post progression treatment significantly improved PPS in both groups. The incidence of TRAEs was comparable between two groups.
The addition of TACE to ICI+TKI combination therapy did not result in a substantial improvement in efficacy and prognosis of patients. However, in selected uHCC patients (without preLRT or treated with lenvatinib as combination), ICI+TKI+TACE triple therapy may remarkably improve PFS.
经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)已与基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的全身治疗联合用于不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC),疗效可观。然而,在ICI与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)联合治疗(ICI+TKI)基础上加用TACE(ICI+TKI+TACE)是否优于ICI+TKI联合治疗尚不清楚。因此,本研究比较了ICI+TKI+TACE三联疗法与ICI+TKI双联疗法治疗uHCC患者的疗效。
回顾性纳入2016年1月至2021年12月期间在东方肝胆外科医院接受ICI+TKI+TACE三联疗法或ICI+TKI双联疗法治疗的uHCC患者。对ICI+TKI+TACE组和ICI+TKI组患者进一步进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。主要结局为无进展生存期(PFS)。次要结局为总生存期(OS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。还评估了进展后生存期(PPS)以及治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。
共匹配120例患者。ICI+TKI+TACE三联疗法组的中位PFS为8.4个月,而ICI+TKI双联疗法组为6.6个月(HR 0.72,95%CI 0.48-1.08;P=0.115)。OS方面也得到了类似结果(26.9个月对24.2个月,HR 0.88,95%CI 0.51-1.52;P=0.670)。三联疗法组的ORR与双联疗法组相当(16.6%对21.6%,P=0.487)。PFS的进一步亚组分析表明,既往未接受过局部区域治疗(preLRT)的患者(10.5个月对3.7个月,HR 0.35[0.16-0.76];P=0.009)、既往未接受过治疗的患者(10.5个月对3.5个月,HR 0.34[0.14-0.81];P=0.015)或接受乐伐替尼治疗的患者(14.8个月对6.9个月,HR 0.52[0.31-0.87];P=0.013)与双联疗法相比,三联疗法可显著获益。在PFS方面,还检测到治疗与preLRT(P=0.049)或TKI联合使用(P=0.005)之间存在显著交互作用。进展后治疗显著改善了两组的PPS。两组TRAEs的发生率相当。
在ICI+TKI联合治疗基础上加用TACE并未使患者的疗效和预后得到实质性改善。然而,在特定的uHCC患者(无preLRT或接受乐伐替尼联合治疗)中,ICI+TKI+TACE三联疗法可能显著改善PFS。