Hao Kunyu, Wadey Curtis Adrian, Barker Alan R, Williams Craig A
Children's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, DEVON, UK.
Research and Innovation, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Open Heart. 2025 Mar 25;12(1):e003091. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003091.
To assess the effectiveness and safety of strength training (ST) interventions in people with congenital heart disease (ConHD).
Participants included people of all ages diagnosed with all complexity of ConHD. Interventions included strength training or inspiratory muscle training (IMT) which were delivered in whole or as part of a more holistic programme. Included studies were randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. A comprehensive literature search using five databases until June 2023 was conducted. Two authors independently screened all the identified studies and assessed the risk of bias. Due to the paucity of studies and significant differences in study design, albatross plots were produced, and synthesis without meta-analyses was used to assist in the interpretation of results.
A total of 26 studies were included with a total of 659 participants (53% female). Three of five studies demonstrated that ST significantly improves muscle strength. The albatross plots (20 studies) compared peak oxygen consumption (peak V̇O) of ST alone, combined training and IMT and showed that 16 studies observed an improvement with a standardised mean difference between 0.10 and 0.50. Combined training was more effective than ST alone and IMT for peak V̇O, and ST alone was second. The results showed high heterogeneity. Three studies (one ST alone and two combined training) reported a total of five adverse events, but none reported serious adverse events or fatalities.
This systematic review indicates a moderate improvement in muscle strength by ST alone, with a small improvement in peak V̇O in people with ConHD. Although the outcomes are positive, there is still insufficient evidence to establish the clinical significance of ST.
评估力量训练(ST)干预对先天性心脏病(ConHD)患者的有效性和安全性。
参与者包括所有年龄段、患有各种复杂程度先天性心脏病的人群。干预措施包括力量训练或吸气肌训练(IMT),这些训练可以全部进行,也可以作为更全面方案的一部分。纳入的研究包括随机对照试验、非随机对照试验和队列研究。使用五个数据库进行了全面的文献检索,截至2023年6月。两位作者独立筛选所有已识别的研究,并评估偏倚风险。由于研究数量较少且研究设计存在显著差异,绘制了信天翁图,并采用无荟萃分析的综合方法来辅助结果解释。
共纳入26项研究,总计659名参与者(53%为女性)。五项研究中的三项表明,力量训练显著提高了肌肉力量。信天翁图(20项研究)比较了单独力量训练、联合训练和吸气肌训练的峰值耗氧量(峰值V̇O),结果显示16项研究观察到有改善,标准化平均差在0.10至0.50之间。联合训练在提高峰值V̇O方面比单独力量训练和吸气肌训练更有效,单独力量训练次之。结果显示异质性较高。三项研究(一项单独力量训练和两项联合训练)共报告了五起不良事件,但均未报告严重不良事件或死亡。
本系统评价表明,单独进行力量训练可使先天性心脏病患者的肌肉力量有适度改善,峰值V̇O有小幅改善。尽管结果是积极的,但仍缺乏足够证据来确定力量训练的临床意义。