Suppr超能文献

导航辅助大分割放疗(NAVAH)乳腺癌患者I期临床试验:通过财务毒性综合评分-慢性病治疗功能评估(COST-FACIT)调查问卷评估个人与家庭财务毒性的意义。

Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) Phase I Clinical Trial of Breast Cancer Patients: Implications for Assessing Personal Versus Familial Financial Toxicity via the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) Survey Instrument.

作者信息

Kasliwal Nimisha, Stephens Maya J, Burnette Ursula J, Onyewadume Louisa, McClelland Shearwood

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.

Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jul 1;48(7):342-344. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001190. Epub 2025 Mar 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The COST-FACIT survey has been used to objectively measure financial toxicity (FT). It consists of 11 questions related to FT of an individual and a 12th question ("My illness has been a financial hardship to my family and me"), providing a glimpse beyond individual FT into familial FT. This question does not contribute to the score, and in relation to the first 11 questions, it has not been rigorously evaluated in the past. We present findings from our ongoing phase I clinical trial to evaluate the correlation of familial FT to individual FT.

METHODS

This study included African-American adult (18+) breast cancer patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer undergoing adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Patients were guided by a patient navigator during and after treatment. COST-FACIT results were amalgamated to find FT in patients before RT. Grade 0 (absent) FT is represented by values from 26 to 44, grade 1 (mild) FT is represented by values from 14 to 25, grade 2 (moderate) FT represented by values from 1 to 13, and grade 3 (severe) FT is represented by a value of 0. Question 12 ranges from 0 to 4, with a higher number meaning more familial distress. The r -value of the comparison between the answer to COST-FACIT question 12 and the COST-FACIT FT score was used to identify a relationship between familial FT and the FT experienced by the individual.

RESULTS

Nearly 90% of patients experiencing individual FT perceive it in their family. Individual FT is strongly correlated with familial FT ( P =0.0001). Overall, patients with higher levels of individual FT indicate higher levels of familial FT, whereas those with lower levels of individual FT indicate lower levels of familial FT.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate a strong correlation between individual FT and familial FT, warranting further investigation into the interconnected impacts on patients and caregivers to better address financial toxicity in cancer care.

摘要

目的

COST-FACIT调查已被用于客观测量经济毒性(FT)。它由11个与个人经济毒性相关的问题以及第12个问题(“我的疾病给我和我的家庭带来了经济困难”)组成,该问题使我们得以窥见个人经济毒性之外的家庭经济毒性情况。这个问题不计入得分,并且就前11个问题而言,过去尚未对其进行严格评估。我们展示了正在进行的I期临床试验的结果,以评估家庭经济毒性与个人经济毒性之间的相关性。

方法

本研究纳入了年龄在18岁及以上、经病理确诊为乳腺癌且正在接受辅助放疗(RT)的非裔美国成年患者。患者在治疗期间和治疗后由患者导航员提供指导。合并COST-FACIT结果以确定放疗前患者的经济毒性情况。0级(无)经济毒性由26至44的数值表示,1级(轻度)经济毒性由14至25的数值表示,2级(中度)经济毒性由1至13的数值表示,3级(重度)经济毒性由0的数值表示。问题12的范围是0至4,数值越高表示家庭困扰越大。使用COST-FACIT问题12的答案与COST-FACIT经济毒性得分之间比较的r值来确定家庭经济毒性与个人所经历的经济毒性之间的关系。

结果

近90%经历个人经济毒性的患者在其家庭中也察觉到了这一点。个人经济毒性与家庭经济毒性密切相关(P = 0.0001)。总体而言,个人经济毒性水平较高的患者家庭经济毒性水平也较高,而个人经济毒性水平较低的患者家庭经济毒性水平也较低。

结论

我们的研究结果表明个人经济毒性与家庭经济毒性之间存在密切相关性,有必要进一步调查对患者和护理人员的相互影响,以更好地应对癌症护理中的经济毒性问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验