Metcalf Olivia, Lamb Karen E, Forbes David, O'Donnell Meaghan L, Qian Tianchen, Varker Tracey, Cowlishaw Sean, Zaloumis Sophie
Phoenix Australia - Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2472485. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2472485. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
Digital technologies offer tremendous potential to predict dysregulated mood and behavior within an individual's environment, and in doing so can support the development of new digital health interventions. However, no prediction models have been built in trauma-exposed populations that leverage real-world data. This project aimed to determine if wearable-derived physiological data can predict anger intensity in trauma-exposed adults. Heart rate variability (i.e. a commercial wearable stress score) was combined with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data collected over 10 days ( = 84). Five summary measures from stress scores collected 10 min prior to each EMA were selected using factor analysis of 24 candidates. A high area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was found for a logistic mixed effects model including these measures as predictors, ranging 0.761 (95% CI:0.569-0.921) to 0.899 (95% CI:0.784-0.980) across cross-validation methods. While the predictive performance may be overly optimistic due to the outcome prevalence (13.8%) and requires replication with larger datasets, our promising findings have significant methodological and clinical implications for researchers looking to build novel prediction and treatment approaches to respond to posttraumatic mental health.
数字技术在预测个体环境中失调的情绪和行为方面具有巨大潜力,并且这样做能够支持新的数字健康干预措施的开发。然而,尚未在利用现实世界数据的创伤暴露人群中建立预测模型。该项目旨在确定可穿戴设备获取的生理数据是否能够预测创伤暴露成年人的愤怒强度。心率变异性(即一种商业可穿戴压力评分)与在10天内收集的生态瞬时评估(EMA)数据相结合(n = 84)。使用对24个候选指标的因子分析,从每次EMA前10分钟收集的压力评分中选择了五个汇总指标。对于一个将这些指标作为预测因子的逻辑混合效应模型,发现其受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)较高,在交叉验证方法中范围为0.761(95%CI:0.569 - 0.921)至0.899(95%CI:0.784 - 0.980)。虽然由于结果患病率(13.8%),预测性能可能过于乐观,并且需要用更大的数据集进行重复验证,但我们的有前景的发现对于寻求构建应对创伤后心理健康的新型预测和治疗方法的研究人员具有重大的方法学和临床意义。