Stavrakas Panagiotis, Christou Evita Evangelia, Nasikas Vasileios, Koutsiouki Chrysoula, Vakalis Athanasios, Asteriadis Solon, Panos Georgios D, Tranos Paris
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Ophthalmica Eye Institute, 54622 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 12;61(3):488. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030488.
: To investigate anatomical and functional outcomes in different morphological subtypes of diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) over 6 months follow-up. : A retrospective, comparative study on patients with DME who received an intravitreal dexamethasone implant. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST) and maximum CST on optical coherence tomography (OCT) were measured. The recruits were divided into three groups based on the morphological patterns of DME: serous retinal detachment (SRD), cystic macular edema (CME) and diffuse retinal thickening (DRT). The presence or absence of previous treatment were considered as being previously treated with anti-VEGF (PT) vs. naïve eyes (TN). All subjects received a single injection of the dexamethasone implant. The primary outcomes included changes in BCVA, CST and CSTMax at 2-, 4- and 6-months of follow-up. : CST was significantly reduced following one dexamethasone injection in the whole cohort from a total mean value of 513.3 μm to 368.2 μm at 2 months, 447.2 μm at 4 months and 471.5 μm at 6 months. The change in CST was significantly greater in SRD as opposed to the DRT and CME group at all time points. Overall, BCVA improved from 0.82 at baseline to 0.75 and 0.76 LogMAR at 2 and 4 months, respectively, whilst showing an overall deterioration to 0.84 at 6 months. The CME group showed the best BCVA at 6 months. Concerning treatment status (TN vs. PT), there was no significant difference in CST at 2 and 4 months, while CST was reduced at 6 months for the PT group ( = 0.023). Similarly, BCVA was significantly better in the PT group at 6 months ( = 0.017). : The dexamethasone implant was effective in reducing DME and providing short-term BCVA improvement. The presence of SRD was associated with more favorable anatomical results, while CME was associated with better visual acuity. Dexamethasone provided superior results in previously treated patients.
在6个月的随访期内,研究玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入剂(Ozurdex)治疗不同形态亚型糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的解剖学和功能学结果。
对接受玻璃体内地塞米松植入剂治疗的DME患者进行一项回顾性比较研究。测量最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)下的中心凹下厚度(CST)和最大CST。根据DME的形态学模式将受试者分为三组:浆液性视网膜脱离(SRD)、黄斑囊样水肿(CME)和弥漫性视网膜增厚(DRT)。是否接受过先前治疗被分为曾接受抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗(PT)与初治眼(TN)。所有受试者均接受单次地塞米松植入剂注射。主要结局包括随访2个月、4个月和6个月时BCVA、CST和最大CST(CSTMax)的变化。
在整个队列中,单次注射地塞米松后,CST在2个月时从总平均值513.3μm显著降至368.2μm,4个月时降至447.2μm,6个月时降至471.5μm。在所有时间点,SRD组CST的变化显著大于DRT组和CME组。总体而言,BCVA从基线时的0.82分别改善至2个月时的0.75 LogMAR和4个月时的0.76 LogMAR,而在6个月时总体恶化至0.84 LogMAR。CME组在6个月时BCVA最佳。关于治疗状态(TN与PT),2个月和4个月时CST无显著差异,而PT组在6个月时CST降低(P = 0.023)。同样,PT组在6个月时BCVA显著更好(P = 0.017)。
地塞米松植入剂在减轻DME和提供短期BCVA改善方面有效。SRD的存在与更有利的解剖学结果相关,而CME与更好的视力相关。地塞米松在先前接受治疗的患者中效果更佳。