Yoshiyasu Nobuyuki, Jo Taisuke, Sato Masaaki, Kumazawa Ryosuke, Matsui Hiroki, Fushimi Kiyohide, Nagase Takahide, Yasunaga Hideo, Nakajima Jun
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
JHLT Open. 2023 Oct 11;2:100010. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2023.100010. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is a well-established surgical procedure with favorable outcomes; however, the frequency of readmission and costs in LDLLT are poorly understood. Here, we aimed to compare health care costs and readmissions at 90 days and 1 year after the index discharge in LDLLT and cadaveric lung transplantation (CLT) and evaluate the reasons for readmission and in-hospital mortality. In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a nationwide inpatient database in Japan to obtain initial lung transplantation data for all patients from July 2010 to March 2020. Multivariable Poisson or multiple regression analyses after multiple imputation was performed to compare the cumulative number of readmissions and costs between patients receiving LDLLT and CLT. Among 514 recipients, 115 (22%) underwent LDLLT and 399 (78%) received CLT. Overall, in-hospital mortality after transplantation was 4.5%. The LDLLT group showed a significantly lower crude readmission rate (90 days, 22% vs 37%, = 0.004; 1 year, 48% vs 62%, = 0.031) and median readmission cost (90 days, United States dollar (USD) 0 vs 0, = 0.003; 1 year, USD 1178 vs 4714, = 0.005) than the CLT group. Multivariable regression analyses showed that the LDLLT group had a lower risk of readmission (incidence rate ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.92; = 0.020) and lower costs at 90 days (difference, USD -11,629; 95% confidence interval, -5682 to -17,462; < 0.001). The most frequent cause of readmission was pneumonia in both groups. LDLLT was associated with lower readmissions and health care costs in comparison with CLT. Our findings provide a scientific basis for further studies with larger cohorts.
活体供者肺叶移植(LDLLT)是一种成熟的外科手术,效果良好;然而,人们对LDLLT的再入院频率和费用了解甚少。在此,我们旨在比较LDLLT和尸体肺移植(CLT)在首次出院后90天和1年时的医疗费用和再入院情况,并评估再入院原因和住院死亡率。在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用了日本全国住院患者数据库——诊断程序组合数据库,以获取2010年7月至2020年3月期间所有患者的初始肺移植数据。在多次插补后进行多变量泊松或多元回归分析,以比较接受LDLLT和CLT的患者之间的再入院累计次数和费用。在514名受者中,115名(22%)接受了LDLLT,399名(78%)接受了CLT。总体而言,移植后的住院死亡率为4.5%。LDLLT组的粗再入院率(90天,22%对37%,P = 0.004;1年,48%对62%,P = 0.031)和再入院费用中位数(90天,0美元对0美元,P = 0.003;1年,1178美元对4714美元,P = 0.005)均显著低于CLT组。多变量回归分析显示,LDLLT组的再入院风险较低(发病率比,0.59;95%置信区间,0.38 - 0.92;P = 0.020),且90天时费用较低(差值,-11629美元;95%置信区间,-5682至-17462;P < 0.001)。两组中最常见的再入院原因均为肺炎。与CLT相比,LDLLT的再入院率和医疗费用较低。我们的研究结果为进一步开展更大队列研究提供了科学依据。