da Silva Guilherme Mainardi Aguiar, Wagner Mitchell J, Hatami Sanaz, Hassanzadeh Parham, Wang Xiuhua, Adam Benjamin A, Nagendran Jayan, Freed Darren H
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
JHLT Open. 2025 Feb 21;8:100234. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100234. eCollection 2025 May.
Ex-situ heart perfusion (ESHP) has been proposed as an optimal method for preserving donated hearts prior to transplantation. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOP) is a simple method from a device design perspective, with enhanced safety compared to normothermic perfusion in the event of device failure. However, the optimal temperature for cardiac HOP has yet to be determined. We evaluated the effectiveness of 12-hour HOP using University of Wisconsin Machine Perfusion Solution (UWMPS) in different temperatures compared to static cold storage (SCS) for 6 hours followed by simulated transplantation. Additionally, we sought to determine the impact of oxygen supplementation in hypothermic ESHP in the heart function preservation.
Hearts were procured from Yorkshire pigs ( = 35) randomized into 3 preservation therapies: 6 hours-SCS; 12 hours-HOP and 12 hours hypothermic non-oxygenated perfusion (HNOP-without oxygen supplementation). For either HOP or HNOP groups, 3 temperatures were tested (5°C; 10°C; 15°C). After the preservation period, hearts had their function assessed in a normothermic perfusion machine capable of working mode, simulating transplantation.
All perfusion parameters were stable throughout (mean ± SD): aortic flow 65 ± 5.57 ml/min, aortic pressure: 11.51 ± 3.17 mm Hg. All HOP hearts presented a better cardiac index than SCS ( < 0.05). The HNOP hearts presented similar cardiac function results compared to SCS.
HOP for 12 hours had better heart function preservation than SCS for 6 hours. Even HNOP had similar results compared to SCS. Greater edema formation in ESHP hearts did not affect heart function. Hypothermic ESHP safely enhances function preservation compared to SCS.
异位心脏灌注(ESHP)已被提议作为移植前保存捐献心脏的最佳方法。低温氧合灌注(HOP)从设备设计角度来看是一种简单的方法,在设备故障时与常温灌注相比安全性更高。然而,心脏HOP的最佳温度尚未确定。我们评估了使用威斯康星大学机器灌注液(UWMPS)在不同温度下进行12小时HOP与6小时静态冷藏(SCS)后再进行模拟移植的效果。此外,我们试图确定低温ESHP中补充氧气对心脏功能保存的影响。
从约克郡猪(n = 35)获取心脏,随机分为3种保存疗法:6小时-SCS;12小时-HOP和12小时低温非氧合灌注(HNOP - 不补充氧气)。对于HOP或HNOP组,测试了3个温度(5°C;10°C;15°C)。保存期结束后,在能够模拟移植工作模式的常温灌注机中评估心脏功能。
所有灌注参数在整个过程中均稳定(平均值±标准差):主动脉流量65±5.57 ml/分钟,主动脉压力:11.51±3.17 mmHg。所有HOP心脏的心脏指数均优于SCS(P < 0.05)。HNOP心脏的心脏功能结果与SCS相似。
12小时的HOP比6小时的SCS具有更好的心脏功能保存效果。即使HNOP与SCS相比也有相似结果。ESHP心脏中更大的水肿形成并未影响心脏功能。与SCS相比,低温ESHP安全地增强了功能保存。