Jensen Catherine B, Sinco Brandy, Saucke Megan C, Bushaw Kyle J, Antunez Alexis G, Voils Corrine I, Pitt Susan C
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Med Decis Making. 2025 May;45(4):426-436. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251325837. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
BackgroundCancer diagnosis causes emotional distress, which can influence patients' treatment choice. This study aimed to investigate the effect of increased emotionally supportive surgeon communication in a virtual setting on treatment preference for thyroid cancer.DesignThis randomized trial (NCT05132478), conducted from November 2021 to February 2023, enrolled adults with ≤4-cm thyroid nodules not requiring surgery. Participants were randomized 1:1 to watch a virtual clinic visit depicting a patient-surgeon treatment discussion for low-risk thyroid cancer. Control and intervention videos were identical except for added emotionally supportive communication in the intervention. The primary outcome was treatment preference for total thyroidectomy or lobectomy. Secondary outcomes were perceived physician empathy, physician trust, decisional confidence, and disease-specific knowledge. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed using conditional regression to account for stratification by sex. Qualitative content analysis evaluated participants' open-ended responses about treatment choice and surgeon communication.ResultsOf 208 eligible patients, 118 (56.7%) participated. Participants were 85.6% female and 88.1% White. Overall, 89.0% ( = 105) of participants preferred lobectomy, which was similar between the intervention and control groups (90.0% v. 87.9%, respectively, = 0.72). Compared with control, participants who viewed the consultation with enhanced communication perceived higher levels of physician empathy (34.5 ± 5.8 v. 25.9 ± 9.1, < 0.001) and reported increased trust in the physician (12.0 ± 2.6 v. 10.4 ± 3.1, < 0.001). The groups were similar in decisional confidence (7.6 ± 2.1 v. 7.7 ± 1.9, = 0.74) and disease-specific knowledge. Prominent qualitative themes among participants choosing thyroid lobectomy included desire to avoid daily thyroid hormone ( = 53) and concerns about surgical complications ( = 25).ConclusionsIn this randomized controlled study, a significant proportion of participants preferred thyroid lobectomy if diagnosed with low-risk thyroid cancer. Participants perceived increased empathy when provided even in the virtual setting, which was associated with increased trust in the physician.HighlightsIn this single-site, randomized controlled trial, enhanced emotionally supportive surgeon communication had no effect on hypothetical treatment preference for low-risk thyroid cancer.Participants who experienced enhanced emotionally supportive surgeon communication perceived higher physician empathy and reported greater trust in the physician.The incorporation of empathetic communication during surgical consultation for low-risk thyroid cancer promotes patient trust and perception of empathy.
背景
癌症诊断会引发情绪困扰,这可能会影响患者的治疗选择。本研究旨在调查在虚拟环境中增加情感支持性的外科医生沟通对甲状腺癌治疗偏好的影响。
设计
这项随机试验(NCT05132478)于2021年11月至2023年2月进行,纳入了甲状腺结节直径≤4厘米且无需手术的成年人。参与者被随机分为1:1两组,观看一段虚拟门诊视频,视频展示了患者与外科医生关于低风险甲状腺癌的治疗讨论。对照组和干预组的视频除了干预组增加了情感支持性沟通外,其他内容相同。主要结局是对甲状腺全切除术或甲状腺叶切除术的治疗偏好。次要结局包括感知到的医生同理心、对医生的信任、决策信心和疾病特异性知识。采用条件回归进行意向性分析,以考虑按性别分层的情况。定性内容分析评估了参与者关于治疗选择和外科医生沟通的开放式回答。
结果
在208名符合条件的患者中,118名(56.7%)参与了研究。参与者中85.6%为女性,88.1%为白人。总体而言,89.0%(n = 105)的参与者更喜欢甲状腺叶切除术,干预组和对照组之间这一比例相似(分别为90.0%和87.9%,P = 0.72)。与对照组相比,观看了增强沟通的咨询视频的参与者感知到更高水平的医生同理心(34.5±5.8 vs 25.9±9.1,P < 0.001),并报告对医生的信任有所增加(12.0±2.6 vs 10.4±3.1,P < 0.001)。两组在决策信心(7.6±2.1 vs 7.7±1.9,P = 0.74)和疾病特异性知识方面相似。选择甲状腺叶切除术的参与者中突出的定性主题包括希望避免每日服用甲状腺激素(n = 53)以及对手术并发症的担忧(n = 25)。
结论
在这项随机对照研究中,如果被诊断为低风险甲状腺癌,很大一部分参与者更喜欢甲状腺叶切除术。即使在虚拟环境中提供情感支持,参与者也会感知到更多的同理心,这与对医生信任的增加有关。
要点
在这项单中心随机对照试验中,增强情感支持性的外科医生沟通对低风险甲状腺癌的假设治疗偏好没有影响。
经历了增强情感支持性外科医生沟通的参与者感知到更高的医生同理心,并报告对医生的信任度更高。
在低风险甲状腺癌手术咨询中纳入同理心沟通可促进患者信任和同理心感知。