Funk Tjede, Nørgaard Sarah Kristine, Hallundbæk Louise, Grau Julie, Ethelberg Steen, Valentiner-Branth Palle, Andersen Peter Henrik
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; ECDC Fellowship Programme, Field Epidemiology path (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vaccine. 2025 Apr 30;54:126934. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126934. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
In August 2019, Denmark implemented a proactive childhood vaccination reminder system. This study aimed to assess the effect of the introduction of this vaccination reminder system on vaccination coverage and uptake of the first four childhood vaccinations, namely the tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis, polio, haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)-infection vaccination (DTaP-IPV/Hib) recommended at three, five and twelve months as well as mumps, measles, rubella vaccination (MMR1) recommended at 15 months.
This was a retrospective register-based cohort study based on two birth cohorts: children born in January 2018 (i.e. control group) and January 2022 (i.e. intervention group). All children that lived in Denmark and were alive during the entire study period were included. Children were followed-up from two weeks before to six weeks after each scheduled vaccination. The end of the study period was therefore at 16.5 months. Differences in vaccination status were tested at six weeks after scheduled vaccination. The median days to vaccination were calculated and compared between the two cohorts. Kaplan Meier curves and logrank tests were used to compare vaccination uptake over time between the two cohorts. Logistic regression analyses tested for differences in vaccination coverage at six weeks after scheduled vaccination between the study groups. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using alternative birth cohorts.
The vaccination coverage at six weeks after scheduled vaccination was higher for children in the intervention cohort for all vaccinations, except the second diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-polio-Hib vaccine (DTaP-IPV/Hib2) given at 5 months. Fewer children in the intervention cohort were unvaccinated (3.4 % vs 1.3%3 %; p < 0.001) and more children had received all three DTaP-IPV/Hib vaccinations at the end of the study period (88.3 % versus 79.0 %; p < 0.001). Children in the intervention group were significantly more likely to have been vaccinated at six weeks after scheduled vaccination for all vaccinations except DTaP-IPV/Hib2, compared to the control group.
This study indicated that the children vaccinated under the proactive vaccination reminder system did have a higher vaccination coverage for three out of four investigated childhood vaccinations and a somewhat quicker vaccination uptake than children vaccinated before the introduction of the reminder system.
2019年8月,丹麦实施了一项积极的儿童疫苗接种提醒系统。本研究旨在评估引入该疫苗接种提醒系统对疫苗接种覆盖率以及前四种儿童疫苗接种情况的影响,这四种疫苗分别是在3个月、5个月和12个月时推荐接种的破伤风、白喉、无细胞百日咳、脊髓灰质炎、b型流感嗜血杆菌感染疫苗(DTaP-IPV/Hib),以及在15个月时推荐接种的腮腺炎、麻疹、风疹疫苗(MMR1)。
这是一项基于登记的回顾性队列研究,基于两个出生队列:2018年1月出生的儿童(即对照组)和2022年1月出生的儿童(即干预组)。纳入所有居住在丹麦且在整个研究期间存活的儿童。在每次预定疫苗接种前两周至接种后六周对儿童进行随访。因此,研究期结束时为16.5个月。在预定疫苗接种后六周测试疫苗接种状态的差异。计算并比较两个队列接种疫苗的中位天数。使用Kaplan Meier曲线和对数秩检验比较两个队列随时间的疫苗接种情况。逻辑回归分析测试研究组在预定疫苗接种后六周时疫苗接种覆盖率的差异。使用替代出生队列进行敏感性分析。
除了在5个月时接种的第二剂白喉-破伤风-百日咳-脊髓灰质炎-Hib疫苗(DTaP-IPV/Hib2)外,干预队列中儿童在预定疫苗接种后六周时所有疫苗的接种覆盖率均更高。干预队列中未接种疫苗的儿童更少(3.4%对1.3%;P<0.001),并且在研究期结束时更多儿童接种了所有三剂DTaP-IPV/Hib疫苗(88.3%对79.%;P<0.001)。与对照组相比,干预组中除DTaP-IPV/Hib2外的所有疫苗在预定疫苗接种后六周时接种疫苗的可能性显著更高。
本研究表明,在积极的疫苗接种提醒系统下接种疫苗的儿童,在所调查 的四种儿童疫苗中的三种疫苗接种覆盖率更高,并且比在引入提醒系统之前接种疫苗的儿童接种速度略快。