• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

磁共振弹性成像在子宫腺肌病诊断中应用的可行性研究

Feasibility study of the application of magnetic resonance elastography to diagnose uterine adenomyosis.

作者信息

Jain Varsha, Hojo Emi, McKillop Graham, Oniscu Anca, Le Yuan, Chen Jun, Ehman Richard, Roberts Neil, Critchley Hilary O D

机构信息

Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Simpson's Centre for Repoductive Health, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

F S Sci. 2025 May;6(2):242-251. doi: 10.1016/j.xfss.2025.03.003. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.xfss.2025.03.003
PMID:40147715
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), a novel imaging technique that allows in vivo measurement of tissue mechanical properties, was used to test the prediction that the stiffness of the uterus may be increased due to fibrotic changes in patients with adenomyosis.

DESIGN

A feasibility study in which a 3-dimensional (3D) MRE imaging protocol was developed to measure the stiffness of the tissues of the uterus.

SUBJECTS

Four patients with suspected adenomyosis and heavy menstrual bleeding diagnosed via transvaginal ultrasound and clinical history and 1 healthy control were recruited. Two patients underwent hysterectomy, and histologic analysis of the tissue samples was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The stiffness of the whole uterus was obtained by region of interest analysis of the 3D MRE images for the 4 patients and 1 healthy control. In addition, for the 2 patients who underwent hysterectomy, the uterine tissue samples were assessed to determine histologic presence of adenomyosis via hematoxylin and eosin staining, cellular/molecular measures of tissue stiffness (collagen [picrosirius red], α-smooth muscle actin, and e-cadherin), and whether a relationship existed between in vivo assessment of the uterus via 3D MRE and in vitro uterine tissue histology.

RESULTS

3D MRE was successfully used to acquire elastograms for 4 patients with adenomyosis (diffuse, n = 3; focal, n = 1) and 1 healthy control. Calculated global uterine stiffness was higher in women with adenomyosis (2.93 kPa; range, 2.34-3.39 kPa) than in the healthy control (2.04 kPa). Regions of high stiffness on the 3D elastograms reflected adenomyotic changes visualized via conventional magnetic resonance imaging and were correlated with histologic and immunohistochemical markers of tissue stiffness.

CONCLUSION

3D MRE has the potential to provide non-invasive characterization of changes in the mechanical properties of uterine tissue that is not possible using conventional magnetic resonance imaging or transvaginal ultrasound. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of the 3D MRE protocol for diagnosing adenomyosis.

摘要

目的

磁共振弹性成像(MRE)是一种能够在体内测量组织力学特性的新型成像技术,本研究旨在验证子宫腺肌病患者因纤维化改变导致子宫硬度增加这一预测。

设计

一项可行性研究,其中开发了一种三维(3D)MRE成像方案来测量子宫组织的硬度。

研究对象

招募了4例经阴道超声及临床病史诊断为疑似子宫腺肌病且月经过多的患者和1例健康对照。2例患者接受了子宫切除术,并对组织样本进行了组织学分析。

主要观察指标

通过对4例患者和1例健康对照的3D MRE图像进行感兴趣区域分析,获得整个子宫的硬度。此外,对于2例接受子宫切除术的患者,通过苏木精和伊红染色、组织硬度的细胞/分子测量指标(胶原[苦味酸天狼星红]、α平滑肌肌动蛋白和E-钙黏蛋白)评估子宫组织样本,以确定子宫腺肌病的组织学存在情况,并确定通过3D MRE对子宫进行的体内评估与体外子宫组织学之间是否存在关联。

结果

3D MRE成功用于获取4例子宫腺肌病患者(弥漫性,n = 3;局灶性,n = 1)和1例健康对照的弹性成像图。子宫腺肌病患者计算出的整体子宫硬度(2.93 kPa;范围为2.34 - 3.39 kPa)高于健康对照(2.04 kPa)。3D弹性成像图上的高硬度区域反映了通过传统磁共振成像观察到的子宫腺肌病变化,并与组织硬度的组织学和免疫组化标记物相关。

结论

3D MRE有可能对子宫组织力学特性的变化进行非侵入性表征,而这是传统磁共振成像或经阴道超声无法做到的。需要进一步研究以确认3D MRE方案在诊断子宫腺肌病方面的有效性。

相似文献

1
Feasibility study of the application of magnetic resonance elastography to diagnose uterine adenomyosis.磁共振弹性成像在子宫腺肌病诊断中应用的可行性研究
F S Sci. 2025 May;6(2):242-251. doi: 10.1016/j.xfss.2025.03.003. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
2
Uterine fibroids: correlations between MRI appearance and stiffness via magnetic resonance elastography.子宫肌瘤:磁共振弹性成像显示的外观与硬度之间的相关性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jun;43(6):1456-1463. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1314-1.
3
Real-time elastography for assessment of uterine disorders.用于评估子宫疾病的实时弹性成像技术。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;43(2):218-26. doi: 10.1002/uog.12519. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
4
Importance of Transvaginal Elastography in the Diagnosis of Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis.经阴道弹性成像在子宫肌瘤和子宫腺肌病诊断中的重要性
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):373-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1553266. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
5
Three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis of adenomyosis: histologic correlation with ultrasound targeted biopsies of the uterus.三维超声在子宫腺肌病诊断中的应用:与超声靶向子宫活检的组织学相关性。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Nov-Dec;20(6):803-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.002.
6
Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms.18至30岁未孕且无子宫内膜异位症的女性弥漫性子宫腺肌病的经阴道超声特征:与症状的关联
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;46(6):730-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.14834.
7
3D MR elastography of the pancreas in children.儿童胰腺的 3D MR 弹性成像
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 May;44(5):1834-1840. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-01903-w.
8
Which imaging method is better for the differentiation of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids?哪种影像学方法更有助于鉴别子宫腺肌病和子宫肌瘤?
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 May;50(5):102002. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102002. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
9
Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach.诊断子宫腺肌病:一种综合的临床和影像学方法。
Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Apr 15;26(3):392-411. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz049.
10
Transvaginal Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography for the Evaluation of Benign Uterine Pathologies: A Prospective Pilot Study.经阴道超声剪切波弹性成像在评估子宫良性病变中的应用:一项前瞻性初步研究。
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Jan;38(1):149-155. doi: 10.1002/jum.14676. Epub 2018 May 6.