Schulz-Costello Katharine, Fan Fang, Schmolze Daniel, Arias-Stella Javier A, Taylor Lesley, Tseng Jennifer, Afkhami Michelle, Rand Jamie G, Jones Veronica, Farmah Preeti, Han Min
Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Department of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Hum Pathol. 2025 Mar;157:105760. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2025.105760. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
Solid basaloid adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast (SB-AdCC) is an exceedingly rare but important entity that warrants clear separation from classic AdCC (C-AdCC) for optimal treatment. This case series retrospectively reviewed the diagnosis and treatment of 20 breast AdCCs. While four breast pathologists reached consensus on the diagnosis of all C-AdCCs, there was considerable disagreement when diagnosing pure SB-AdCCs. The morphology and immunohistochemical profiles of SB-AdCC closely resemble those of basaloid triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC). Molecular profiling of SB-AdCC revealed frequent mutations in the Notch pathway and alterations in chromatin modifiers, such as CREBBP and KMT2D. MYB-NFIB fusion was rare and detected in only 2 of 9 (22.2 %) SB-AdCCs. Axillary lymph node metastasis was present in 2 of 10 patients with SB-AdCC at the time of surgery. During a median follow-up of 27 months, one patient with SB-AdCC developed axillary recurrence. Moreover, 6 of 12 (50.0 %) patients with SB-AdCC developed distant metastases. Of the three patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy for SB-AdCC, one achieved near-complete pathological response, while the remaining two had minimal response. In conclusion, this series underscores the aggressive clinical course of SB-AdCC, similar to conventional TNBC. Pathologically, SB-AdCC also closely mimics conventional TNBC. It is imperative for pathologists to clearly indicate C-AdCC or SB-AdCC or give a percentage of each component to ensure appropriate treatment strategies and avoid both over-treatment and under-treatment.
乳腺实性基底样腺样囊性癌(SB-AdCC)是一种极为罕见但重要的疾病实体,为实现最佳治疗,有必要将其与经典腺样囊性癌(C-AdCC)明确区分开来。本病例系列回顾性分析了20例乳腺腺样囊性癌的诊断和治疗情况。虽然四位乳腺病理学家对所有C-AdCC的诊断达成了共识,但在诊断纯SB-AdCC时存在相当大的分歧。SB-AdCC的形态学和免疫组化特征与基底样三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)极为相似。SB-AdCC的分子谱分析显示Notch通路频繁发生突变,且染色质修饰因子如CREBBP和KMT2D发生改变。MYB-NFIB融合罕见,仅在9例(22.2%)SB-AdCC中的2例中检测到。10例SB-AdCC患者中有2例在手术时出现腋窝淋巴结转移。在中位随访27个月期间,1例SB-AdCC患者发生腋窝复发。此外,12例(50.0%)SB-AdCC患者中有6例发生远处转移。在3例接受新辅助化疗的SB-AdCC患者中,1例达到近乎完全的病理缓解,而其余2例缓解甚微。总之,本系列研究强调了SB-AdCC与传统TNBC相似的侵袭性临床病程。在病理上,SB-AdCC也与传统TNBC极为相似。病理学家必须明确指出是C-AdCC还是SB-AdCC,或给出各成分的百分比,以确保采取适当的治疗策略,避免过度治疗和治疗不足。