Chen David C, Buteau James P, Emmett Louise, Alipour Ramin, de Galiza Barbosa Felipe, Roberts Matthew J, McVey Aoife, O'Brien Jonathan, Levy Sidney, Francis Roslyn J, Lawrentschuk Nathan, Murphy Declan G, Hofman Michael S
Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Nucl Med. 2025 May 1;66(5):713-718. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268901.
The current prevalence of low intraprostatic uptake for staging prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET ranges between 4.4% and 17% in retrospective studies. We aimed to define the prevalence and describe the outcomes of patients with low intraprostatic uptake on PSMA PET/CT in the prospective proPSMA study. We identified patients with an SUV of 4 or less on PSMA PET/CT in the proPSMA study. Patients were followed up until 42 mo after randomization. The PRIMARY score was evaluated by 3 nuclear medicine physicians, with the result determined by consensus. Treatment failure was defined as new metastatic disease, biochemical recurrence, or initiation of salvage therapy. Ten of 302 (3.3%; 95% CI, 1.6%-6.0%) patients had low intraprostatic uptake on PSMA PET/CT and normal findings on conventional imaging (CT and whole-body bone scanning). The median age was 66 y (interquartile range, 60.5-70.3 y). International Society of Urological Pathologists biopsy grade group was 3 in 5 patients and 5 in 5 patients, with no atypical histology identified. The median prostate-specific antigen level was 5.1 ng/nL (interquartile range, 2.3-8.3 ng/nL). The median follow-up interval was 30 mo (interquartile range, 24-39 mo). Multiparametric MRI was performed on 5 patients, with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score 5 in 2 patients, 4 in 1 patient, and 2 in 2 patients. The PRIMARY score was positive in 5 of 10 (50%) patients. Five (50%), 4 (30%), and 2 (20%) of 10 patients received radical prostatectomy, definitive radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy alone, respectively. Of the 9 (90%) patients who received definitive treatment, 1 (11%) experienced treatment failure at 18 mo after radical prostatectomy and received metastasis-directed therapy. Biochemical recurrence was nonevaluable in the single patient who received androgen deprivation therapy alone. At the 42-mo follow-up after randomization, 4 of 9 (44%) patients who received definitive therapy remained on trial-none of whom had evidence of treatment failure. No other patients had new metastatic disease or initiation of salvage therapy during follow-up. In the proPSMA trial, there was a low prevalence (3.3%) of low intraprostatic uptake on PSMA PET/CT in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer, and treatment failure was infrequent.
回顾性研究显示,目前前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)PET分期中前列腺内摄取较低的发生率在4.4%至17%之间。我们旨在确定前瞻性proPSMA研究中PSMA PET/CT前列腺内摄取较低的患者的发生率,并描述其结果。我们在proPSMA研究中确定了PSMA PET/CT上SUV为4或更低的患者。对患者进行随访直至随机分组后42个月。由3名核医学医师评估PRIMARY评分,结果通过共识确定。治疗失败定义为出现新的转移性疾病、生化复发或开始挽救性治疗。302例患者中有10例(3.3%;95%CI,1.6%-6.0%)在PSMA PET/CT上前列腺内摄取较低,且传统影像学检查(CT和全身骨扫描)结果正常。中位年龄为66岁(四分位间距,60.5-70.3岁)。国际泌尿病理学家学会活检分级组中,5例患者为3级,5例患者为5级,未发现非典型组织学。前列腺特异性抗原中位水平为5.1 ng/nL(四分位间距,2.3-8.3 ng/nL)。中位随访间隔为30个月(四分位间距,24-39个月)。5例患者进行了多参数MRI检查,前列腺影像报告和数据系统评分中,2例患者为5分,1例患者为4分,2例患者为2分。10例患者中有5例(50%)PRIMARY评分为阳性。10例患者中,分别有5例(50%)、4例(30%)和2例(20%)仅接受了根治性前列腺切除术、确定性放疗和雄激素剥夺治疗。在接受确定性治疗的9例(90%)患者中,1例(11%)在根治性前列腺切除术后18个月出现治疗失败并接受了转移灶导向治疗。仅接受雄激素剥夺治疗的1例患者无法评估生化复发情况。在随机分组后42个月的随访中,接受确定性治疗的9例患者中有4例(44%)仍在试验中,且均无治疗失败的证据。在随访期间,没有其他患者出现新的转移性疾病或开始挽救性治疗。在proPSMA试验中,活检确诊的前列腺癌患者中PSMA PET/CT前列腺内摄取较低的发生率较低(3.3%),且治疗失败情况不常见。