[Comparative study of the treatment of scapular fractures by posterior axillary and lateral scapular approaches].

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical efficacy of transaxillary posterior margin approach and translateral margin approach for the treatment of Miller typeⅡand Ⅳ scapular fractures.

METHODS

From June 2020 to June 2024, 28 patients with fresh scapular fractures (Miller typeⅡand Ⅳ) who were treated with open reduction and locked plate internal fixation were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups. There were 13 patients in posterior axillary margin group, including 8 males and 5 females, aged from 26 to 71 years old with an average of (39.2±6.5) years old;5 patients with typeⅡand 8 patients with type Ⅳ according to Miller classification;9 patients caused by falling down, 4 patients caused by car accident;7 patients on the right side, 6 patients on the left side;the time from injury to operation ranged from 3 to 5 days with an average of (4.07±0.86) days. There were 15 patients in lateral scapula margin group, including 10 males and 5 females, aged from 27 to 63 years old with an average of (43.6±8.5) years old;7 patients with typeⅡand 8 patients with type Ⅳ according to Miller classification;10 patients caused by falling down, 5 patients caused by car accident;6 patients on the right side, 9 patients on the left side;the time from injury to operation ranged from 3 to 5 days with an average of (4.20±0.67) days. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, glenopolar angle (GPA) immediately after operation were compared between two groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Constant-Murley shoulder joint function score were used to evaluate clinical effect at 3 and 6 months after operation, respectively, and the joint motions were evaluated at 6 months after operation.

RESULTS

None of patients occurred wound infection, vascular and nerve damage, loosening or rupture of internal fixation. Both groups were followed up for 8 to 12 months with an average of (9.6±1.5) months. Operative time and intraoperative blood loss of posterior axillary margin group were (76.92±5.60) min and (84.86±10.08) ml, respectively, which were better than those of lateral scapula margin group(84.67±6.93) min and(115.00±12.39) ml(<0.05). Immediate GPA in posterior axillary margin group (36.62±0.87) °and lateral scapula margin group (36.20±0.82)°were significantly improved compared with preoperative (16.10±1.14) °, (16.20±1.20) °(<0.05), while there was no statistical significance between two groups (>0.05). There were no significant difference in fracture healing time and postoperative VAS at 3 and 6 months between two groups (>0.05). Postoperative Constant-Murley score of posterior axillary margin group (75.00±4.02) was higher than that of lateral scapular margin group (70.86±4.24) at 3 months (<0.05), while there was no significant difference between two groups at 6 months after operation (>0.05). At 6 months after operation, joint motion of posterior axillary margin group in flexion (160.38±13.61)°, abduction (154.61±13.91)°, rotation (83.08±2.53)°, rotation (62.69±2.59) ° and extension (51.54±3.15) °, respectively, which were higher than that of lateral scapular margin group in (148.00±15.44)°, (144.00±11.05)°, (79.67±3.99)°, (57.33±4.95)°, (47.33±4.16)°(<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with lateral margin of scapula intermuscular space approach, Buttress approach through the posterior axillary margin for the treatment of Miller typeⅡand Ⅳ scapular fractures provides extensive intraoperative visual field exposure, stable fracture support and less surgical trauma, which could shorten operative time and reduce intraoperative blood loss, providing a new reference for the treatment of complex scapular fractures.