Surial Rashmi, Sahay Sundeep, Modgil Vinay, Mukherjee Arunima, Bhandari Ritika Kondal
Society for Health Information Systems Programmes (HISP India), New Delhi 110025, India.
Department of Informatics and Centre of Sustainable Healthcare Education (SHE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;14(3):213. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030213.
It is well established by research that large-scale and indiscriminate prescribing, dispensing, and use of antimicrobials drive antimicrobial resistance (AMR) endangering the health and well-being of people, animals, and the environment. In the context of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the prescribing of antimicrobials is often not based on biomedical rationality but involves alternative logic driven by social, cultural, and institutional factors. This paper seeks to develop a "biosocial" perspective, reflecting a unified perspective that treats the biomedical and social conditions as two sides of the same coin. This analysis is based on an empirical investigation of prescription slips that patients carry to buy drugs from the pharmacy following an outpatient department encounter with the clinician. Data collection involves mixed methods, including the quantitative analysis of the antimicrobials prescribed and a qualitative analysis of the underlying reasons for these prescriptions, as described by doctors, pharmacists, and patients. Data analysis involved triangulating quantitative and qualitative data, to develop a "biosocial" perspective, which can provide implications for the development of antimicrobial stewardship policies, particularly relevant for health institutions in low- and middle-income countries. Our analysis of 1175 prescription slips showed that 98% contained antimicrobials, with 74% being broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Only 9% of cases were advised antimicrobial sensitivity testing (AST) before initiating treatment. Qualitative findings indicated that patients had poor awareness of antimicrobials and pharmacists played a crucial role in counseling. This study highlights that antimicrobial prescriptions in public health settings are influenced by both biomedical and social factors, supporting a biosocial perspective. Although AMS interventions are predominantly biomedical, adhering to clinical standards and best practices, this study underscores the necessity of integrating a biosocial viewpoint by incorporating the experiences of pharmacists and patient groups. Strengthening diagnostic support, patient education, and interprofessional collaboration could improve rational antimicrobial uses in low-resource settings.
研究已充分证实,大规模且不加区分地开具、调配和使用抗菌药物会导致抗菌药物耐药性(AMR),危及人类、动物的健康及福祉以及环境。在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的背景下,抗菌药物的处方开具往往并非基于生物医学合理性,而是受到社会、文化和制度因素驱动的另类逻辑影响。本文旨在发展一种“生物社会”视角,反映一种将生物医学状况和社会状况视为同一枚硬币两面的统一观点。 该分析基于对患者在门诊与临床医生接触后前往药房购药所携带的处方单的实证调查。数据收集采用混合方法,包括对抗菌药物处方进行定量分析以及对医生、药剂师和患者所描述的这些处方背后的原因进行定性分析。数据分析涉及对定量和定性数据进行三角测量,以形成一种“生物社会”视角,这可为抗菌药物管理政策的制定提供启示,尤其适用于低收入和中等收入国家的卫生机构。 我们对1175张处方单的分析表明,98%的处方单含有抗菌药物,其中74%为广谱抗菌药物。只有9%的病例在开始治疗前被建议进行抗菌药物敏感性测试(AST)。定性研究结果表明,患者对抗菌药物的认知较差,药剂师在咨询方面发挥了关键作用。 本研究强调,公共卫生环境中的抗菌药物处方受到生物医学和社会因素的影响,支持了生物社会视角。尽管抗菌药物管理(AMS)干预主要是生物医学方面的,遵循临床标准和最佳实践,但本研究强调了通过纳入药剂师和患者群体的经验来整合生物社会观点的必要性。加强诊断支持、患者教育和跨专业协作可以改善资源匮乏环境下抗菌药物的合理使用。