Suppr超能文献

基于光学相干断层扫描的黄斑发育不全分级:不同经验水平间的一致性与挑战

Foveal Hypoplasia Grading with Optical Coherence Tomography: Agreement and Challenges Across Experience Levels.

作者信息

Shenoy Riddhi, Maconachie Gail D E, Parida Swati, Tu Zhanhan, Aamir Abdullah, Chean Chung S, Roked Ayesha, Taylor Michael, Garratt George, Rufai Sohaib, Dawar Basu, Isherwood Steven, Ramoutar Ryan, Stubbing-Moore Alex, Prakash Esha, Lakhani Kishan, Maltyn Ethan, Kwan Jennifer, DeSilva Ian, Kuht Helen J, Gottlob Irene, Thomas Mervyn G

机构信息

The University of Leicester Ulverscroft Eye Unit, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK.

Division of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, Health Science School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 18;15(6):763. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15060763.

Abstract

: The diagnosis and prognosis of arrested foveal development or foveal hypoplasia (FH) can be made using the Leicester grading system for FH and optical coherence tomography (OCT). In clinical practice, ophthalmologists and ophthalmic health professionals with varying experience consult patients with FH; however, to date, the FH grading system has only been validated amongst experts. We compare the inter-grader and intra-grade agreement of healthcare professionals against expert consensus across all grades of FH. : Handheld and table-mounted OCT images ( = 341) were graded independently at a single centre by experts ( = 3) with over six years of experience and "novice" medical and allied health professionals ( = 5) with less than three years of experience. Sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's kappa scores were calculated for each grader, and expert vs. novice performance was compared. : All graders showed high sensitivity (median 97% (IQR: 94-99)) and specificity (median 94% (IQR: 90-95)) in identifying the presence or absence of FH. No significant difference was seen in specificity between expert and novice graders, but experts had significantly greater diagnostic sensitivity (median difference = 5.3%, H = 5.00, = 0.025). Expert graders had the highest agreement with the ground truth and novice graders showed great variability in grading uncommon grades, such as atypical FH. The proposed causes of misclassification included macular decentring in handheld OCT scans in children. : Ophthalmologists of varying experience and allied health professionals can accurately identify FH using handheld and table-mounted OCT images. FH identification and paediatric OCT interpretation can be improved in wider ophthalmic clinical settings through the education of ophthalmic staff.

摘要

使用莱斯特黄斑发育不全(FH)分级系统和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)可对黄斑发育停滞或黄斑发育不全(FH)进行诊断和预后评估。在临床实践中,经验各异的眼科医生和眼科保健专业人员会为FH患者提供咨询服务;然而,迄今为止,FH分级系统仅在专家中得到验证。我们比较了医疗保健专业人员在FH所有分级上与专家共识之间的分级者间和分级内一致性。:在一个中心,由3位有超过6年经验的专家和5位经验少于3年的“新手”医学及相关健康专业人员对341张手持式和台式OCT图像进行独立分级。计算每位分级者的敏感性、特异性和科恩kappa系数,并比较专家与新手的表现。:所有分级者在识别FH的存在与否方面均表现出高敏感性(中位数97%(四分位间距:94 - 99))和特异性(中位数94%(四分位间距:90 - 95))。专家分级者和新手分级者在特异性方面未见显著差异,但专家的诊断敏感性显著更高(中位数差异 = 5.3%,H = 5.00,P = 0.025)。专家分级者与真实情况的一致性最高,新手分级者在对不常见分级(如非典型FH)的分级中表现出很大差异。误分类的推测原因包括儿童手持式OCT扫描中的黄斑中心偏移。:经验各异的眼科医生和相关健康专业人员可使用手持式和台式OCT图像准确识别FH。通过对眼科工作人员的教育,可在更广泛的眼科临床环境中改善FH的识别和儿童OCT解读。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验