• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年期的情绪加工:情绪效价和面部年龄对行为及扫描模式的影响。

Emotion Processing in Late Adulthood: The Effect of Emotional Valence and Face Age on Behavior and Scanning Patterns.

作者信息

Meinhardt-Injac Bozana, Altvater-Mackensen Nicole, Mohs Alexandra, Goulet-Pelletier Jean-Christophe, Boutet Isabelle

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Applied Sciences Berlin (KHSB), 10318 Berlin, Germany.

School of Humanities, University of Mannheim, 68161 Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 4;15(3):302. doi: 10.3390/bs15030302.

DOI:10.3390/bs15030302
PMID:40150197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11939290/
Abstract

Age-related differences in emotion recognition are well-documented in older adults aged 65 and above, with stimulus valence and the age of the model being key influencing factors. This study examined these variables across three experiments using a novel set of images depicting younger and older models expressing positive and negative emotions (e.g., happy vs. sad; interested vs. bored). Experiment 1 focused on valence-arousal dimensions, Experiment 2 on emotion recognition accuracy, and Experiment 3 on visual fixation patterns. Age-related differences were found in emotion recognition. No significant age-related differences in gaze behavior were found; both age groups looked more at the eye region. The positivity effect-older adults' tendency to prioritize positive over negative information-did not consistently manifest in recognition performance or scanning patterns. However, older adults evaluated positive emotions differently than negative emotions, rating negative facial expressions as less negative and positive emotions as more arousing compared to younger adults. Finally, emotions portrayed by younger models were rated as more intense and more positive than those portrayed by older adults by both older and younger adults. We conclude that the positivity effect and own-age bias may be more complex and nuanced than previously thought.

摘要

65岁及以上老年人在情绪识别方面的年龄差异已有充分记录,刺激效价和模型年龄是关键影响因素。本研究通过三个实验,使用一组描绘年轻和年长模型表达积极和消极情绪(如快乐与悲伤;感兴趣与无聊)的新颖图像,对这些变量进行了研究。实验1聚焦于效价-唤醒维度,实验2关注情绪识别准确性,实验3研究视觉注视模式。研究发现了情绪识别方面的年龄差异。未发现注视行为上与年龄相关的显著差异;两个年龄组都更多地注视眼部区域。积极效应——老年人倾向于优先处理积极信息而非消极信息——在识别表现或扫描模式中并未始终显现。然而,与年轻人相比,老年人对积极情绪和消极情绪的评价不同,他们将负面面部表情评为不那么负面,而将积极情绪评为更具唤醒性。最后,无论是老年人还是年轻人,都认为年轻模型所描绘的情绪比年长模型所描绘的情绪更强烈、更积极。我们得出结论,积极效应和自身年龄偏差可能比之前认为的更为复杂和微妙。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e0f/11939290/0dffeac97fdd/behavsci-15-00302-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e0f/11939290/085e61bfeded/behavsci-15-00302-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e0f/11939290/163d6e43cb66/behavsci-15-00302-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e0f/11939290/bdd3ced3d183/behavsci-15-00302-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e0f/11939290/3cd4eed73caf/behavsci-15-00302-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e0f/11939290/0dffeac97fdd/behavsci-15-00302-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e0f/11939290/085e61bfeded/behavsci-15-00302-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e0f/11939290/163d6e43cb66/behavsci-15-00302-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e0f/11939290/bdd3ced3d183/behavsci-15-00302-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e0f/11939290/3cd4eed73caf/behavsci-15-00302-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e0f/11939290/0dffeac97fdd/behavsci-15-00302-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Emotion Processing in Late Adulthood: The Effect of Emotional Valence and Face Age on Behavior and Scanning Patterns.老年期的情绪加工:情绪效价和面部年龄对行为及扫描模式的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 4;15(3):302. doi: 10.3390/bs15030302.
2
Older adults get masked emotion priming for happy but not angry faces: evidence for a positivity effect in early perceptual processing of emotional signals.老年人对快乐面孔的情绪启动有掩蔽效应,但对愤怒面孔没有:情绪信号早期感知加工中存在正性偏向的证据。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Dec;36(8):1576-1593. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2138269. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
Adult Age Differences in Evoked Emotional Responses to Dynamic Facial Expressions.成人在对动态面部表情的诱发情绪反应上的年龄差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Jan 1;79(1). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad141.
4
The impact of aging on the neural networks involved in gaze and emotional processing.衰老对参与注视和情绪处理的神经网络的影响。
Neurobiol Aging. 2016 Dec;48:182-194. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.08.026. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
5
The effects of emotion on younger and older adults' monitoring of learning.情绪对年轻人和老年人学习监控的影响。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2017 Sep;24(5):555-574. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2016.1227423. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
Face Age and Eye Gaze Influence Older Adults' Emotion Recognition.面容年龄和眼神注视影响老年人的情绪识别。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Jul 1;72(4):633-636. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv114.
7
Superior recognition performance for happy masked and unmasked faces in both younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人对快乐面具和非面具面孔的识别表现更好。
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 30;3:520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00520. eCollection 2012.
8
Do pictures' emotional valence and arousal affect younger and older adults' narratives?图片的情绪效价和唤醒度是否会影响年轻和年长成年人的叙事?
Psychol Aging. 2024 May;39(3):299-312. doi: 10.1037/pag0000808.
9
Own-Age Bias and Positivity Effects in Facial Recognition.面部识别中的自身年龄偏差和积极效应。
Exp Aging Res. 2018 Oct-Dec;44(5):411-426. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2018.1521493. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
10
Aging and emotional expressions: is there a positivity bias during dynamic emotion recognition?衰老与情绪表达:动态情绪识别过程中是否存在积极偏向?
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 4;6:1130. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01130. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulation of interpersonal distance in virtual reality: Implications for socio-emotional functioning in late adulthood.虚拟现实中人际距离的调节:对成年晚期社会情感功能的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 May 8;20(5):e0323182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323182. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
New directions for studying the aging social-cognitive brain.研究老龄化社会认知大脑的新方向。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Apr;56:101768. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101768. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
2
Age Effects in Emotional Memory and Associated Eye Movements.年龄对情绪记忆及相关眼动的影响。
Brain Sci. 2022 Dec 15;12(12):1719. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121719.
3
Age differences in social-cognitive abilities across the stages of adulthood and path model investigation of adult social cognition.成人阶段社会认知能力的年龄差异及成人社会认知的路径模型研究。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2022 Nov;29(6):1033-1067. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2021.1962789. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
4
Gendered ageism: addressing discrimination based on age and sex.性别化的年龄歧视:应对基于年龄和性别的歧视。
Lancet. 2021 Aug 21;398(10301):648-649. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01636-6. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
5
Having Difficulties Reading the Facial Expression of Older Individuals? Blame It on the Facial Muscles, Not the Wrinkles.难以读懂老年人的面部表情?怪面部肌肉,而非皱纹。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 4;12:620768. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620768. eCollection 2021.
6
Reliability generalization of tasks and recommendations for assessing the ability to perceive facial expressions of emotion.任务可靠性综合评估与感知面部表情能力的建议。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Oct;33(10):911-926. doi: 10.1037/pas0001030. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
Effects of aging on emotion recognition from dynamic multimodal expressions and vocalizations.老化对动态多模态表情和发声的情绪识别的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 29;11(1):2647. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82135-1.
8
Gaze patterns to emotional faces throughout the adult lifespan.成年期全程的情绪面孔注视模式。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Nov;35(7):981-992. doi: 10.1037/pag0000571. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
9
Task characteristics influence facial emotion recognition age-effects: A meta-analytic review.任务特征影响面部情绪识别的年龄效应:一项元分析综述。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Mar;35(2):295-315. doi: 10.1037/pag0000441. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
10
Own-Age Bias and Positivity Effects in Facial Recognition.面部识别中的自身年龄偏差和积极效应。
Exp Aging Res. 2018 Oct-Dec;44(5):411-426. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2018.1521493. Epub 2018 Oct 4.