• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于技术接受模型和技术接受与使用统一理论的老年人医疗保健技术接受影响因素:元分析

Factors Influencing Health Care Technology Acceptance in Older Adults Based on the Technology Acceptance Model and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Yang Hyo Jun, Lee Ji-Hyun, Lee Wonjae

机构信息

Graduate School of Culture Technology, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 28;27:e65269. doi: 10.2196/65269.

DOI:10.2196/65269
PMID:40153796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11992498/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The technology acceptance model (TAM) and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) are widely used to examine health care technology acceptance among older adults. However, existing literature exhibits considerable heterogeneity, making it difficult to determine consistent predictors of acceptance and behavior.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to (1) determine the influence of perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), and social influence (SI) on the behavioral intention (BI) to use health care technology among older adults and (2) assess the moderating effects of age, gender, geographic region, type of health care technology, and presence of visual demonstrations.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ProQuest databases on March 15, 2024, following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Of the 1167 initially identified studies, 41 studies (11,574 participants; mean age 67.58, SD 4.76 years; and female:male ratio=2.00) met the inclusion criteria. The studies comprised 12 mobile health, 12 online or telemedicine, 9 wearable, and 8 home or institution hardware investigations, with 23 studies from Asia, 7 from Europe, 7 from African-Islamic regions, and 4 from the United States. Studies were eligible if they used the TAM or UTAUT, examined health care technology adoption among older adults, and reported zero-order correlations. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, evaluating selection, comparability, and outcome assessment with 34% (14/41) of studies rated as good quality and 66% (27/41) as satisfactory.

RESULTS

Random-effects meta-analysis revealed significant positive correlations for PU-BI (r=0.607, 95% CI 0.543-0.665; P<.001), PEOU-BI (r=0.525, 95% CI 0.462-0.583; P<.001), and SI-BI (r=0.551, 95% CI 0.468-0.624; P<.001). High heterogeneity was observed across studies (I²=95.9%, 93.6%, and 95.3% for PU-BI, PEOU-BI, and SI-BI, respectively). Moderator analyses revealed significant differences based on geographic region for PEOU-BI (Q=8.27; P=.04), with strongest effects in Europe (r=0.628) and weakest in African-Islamic regions (r=0.480). Technology type significantly moderated PU-BI (Q=8.08; P=.04) and SI-BI (Q=14.75; P=.002), with home or institutional hardware showing the strongest effects (PU-BI: r=0.736; SI-BI: r=0.690). Visual demonstrations significantly enhanced PU-BI (r=0.706 vs r=0.554; Q=4.24; P=.04) and SI-BI relationships (r=0.670 vs r=0.492; Q=4.38; P=.04). Age and gender showed no significant moderating effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that PU, PEOU, and SI significantly impact the acceptance of health care technology among older adults, with heterogeneity influenced by geographic region, type of technology, and presence of visual demonstrations. This suggests that tailored strategies for different types of technology and the use of visual demonstrations are important for enhancing adoption rates. Limitations include varying definitions of older adults across studies and the use of correlation coefficients rather than controlled effect sizes. Results should therefore be interpreted within specific contexts and populations.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/d129321d0a0b/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/51baca5ba959/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/9009766e3d6d/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/aca0fdd77fcc/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/290bb93eacea/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/2f4722d227e8/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/3fe12e7936f0/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/d129321d0a0b/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/51baca5ba959/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/9009766e3d6d/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/aca0fdd77fcc/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/290bb93eacea/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/2f4722d227e8/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/3fe12e7936f0/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1a3/11992498/d129321d0a0b/jmir_v27i1e65269_fig7.jpg
摘要

背景

技术接受模型(TAM)和技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)被广泛用于研究老年人对医疗保健技术的接受情况。然而,现有文献存在相当大的异质性,难以确定一致的接受度和行为预测因素。

目的

我们旨在(1)确定感知有用性(PU)、感知易用性(PEOU)和社会影响(SI)对老年人使用医疗保健技术的行为意向(BI)的影响,以及(2)评估年龄、性别、地理区域、医疗保健技术类型和是否存在视觉演示的调节作用。

方法

2024年3月15日,按照PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南,在谷歌学术、科学网、Scopus、IEEE Xplore和ProQuest数据库中进行了系统检索。在最初识别的1167项研究中,41项研究(11574名参与者;平均年龄67.58岁,标准差4.76岁;女性与男性比例为2.00)符合纳入标准。这些研究包括12项移动健康、12项在线或远程医疗、9项可穿戴设备以及8项家庭或机构硬件调查,其中23项研究来自亚洲,7项来自欧洲,7项来自非洲伊斯兰地区,4项来自美国。如果研究使用了TAM或UTAUT,研究了老年人对医疗保健技术的采用情况,并报告了零阶相关性,则该研究符合条件。两名独立评审员筛选研究、提取数据,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估方法学质量,评估选择、可比性和结果评估,34%(14/41)的研究被评为高质量,66%(27/41)为满意。

结果

随机效应Meta分析显示,PU与BI之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.607,95% CI 0.543 - 0.665;P <.001),PEOU与BI之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.525,95% CI 0.462 - 0.583;P <.001),SI与BI之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.551,95% CI 0.468 - 0.624;P <.001)。各研究间观察到高度异质性(PU与BI、PEOU与BI、SI与BI的I²分别为95.9%、93.6%和95.3%)。调节因素分析显示,基于地理区域,PEOU与BI存在显著差异(Q = 8.27;P =.04),在欧洲影响最强(r = 0.628),在非洲伊斯兰地区影响最弱(r = 0.480)。技术类型对PU与BI(Q = 8.08;P =.04)和SI与BI(Q = 14.75;P =.002)有显著调节作用,家庭或机构硬件显示出最强的影响(PU与BI:r = 0.736;SI与BI:r = 0.690)。视觉演示显著增强了PU与BI的关系(r = 0.706对r = 0.554;Q = 4.24;P =.04)以及SI与BI的关系(r = 0.670对r = 0.492;Q = 4.38;P =.04)。年龄和性别未显示出显著的调节作用。

结论

研究结果表明,PU、PEOU和SI显著影响老年人对医疗保健技术的接受度,异质性受地理区域、技术类型和视觉演示的影响。这表明针对不同类型技术的定制策略以及视觉演示的使用对于提高采用率很重要。局限性包括各研究中老年人的定义不同,以及使用的是相关系数而非控制效应量。因此,结果应在特定背景和人群中进行解释。

相似文献

1
Factors Influencing Health Care Technology Acceptance in Older Adults Based on the Technology Acceptance Model and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Meta-Analysis.基于技术接受模型和技术接受与使用统一理论的老年人医疗保健技术接受影响因素:元分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 28;27:e65269. doi: 10.2196/65269.
2
Technology Acceptance Among Low-Income Asian American Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis.低收入亚裔美国老年人的技术接受度:横断面调查分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 22;26:e52498. doi: 10.2196/52498.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Comprehensive Senior Technology Acceptance Model of Daily Living Assistive Technology for Older Adults With Frailty: Cross-sectional Study.老年人衰弱综合高级日常生活辅助技术接受模型:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 10;25:e41935. doi: 10.2196/41935.
5
Adapting the Technology Acceptance Model to Examine the Use of Information Communication Technologies and Loneliness Among Low-Income, Older Asian Americans: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis.调整技术接受模型以研究低收入老年亚裔美国人对信息通信技术的使用与孤独感:横断面调查分析
JMIR Aging. 2025 Jan 8;8:e63856. doi: 10.2196/63856.
6
Exploring Acceptance of Digital Health Technologies for Managing Non-Communicable Diseases Among Older Adults: A Systematic Scoping Review.探索老年人对用于管理非传染性疾病的数字健康技术的接受度:一项系统的范围综述。
J Med Syst. 2025 Mar 11;49(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02166-3.
7
Factors influencing the adoption of telemedicine services among middle-aged and older patients with chronic conditions in rural China: a multicentre cross-sectional study.中国农村慢性病中老年患者采用远程医疗服务的影响因素:一项多中心横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 30;25(1):775. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12931-2.
8
Predictive Factors of Physicians' Satisfaction and Quality of Work Under Teleconsultation Conditions: Structural Equation Analysis.远程问诊条件下影响医师满意度和工作质量的预测因素:结构方程分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jun 10;11:e47810. doi: 10.2196/47810.
9
[Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Smartmonitor-Based Mobile Health in Middle-Aged in Patients Applying the Technology Acceptance Model II].[应用技术接受模型II探讨影响中年患者使用基于智能监测器的移动健康服务意愿的因素]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2024 Nov;54(4):620-632. doi: 10.4040/jkan.24091.
10
Improving Acceptability of mHealth Apps-The Use of the Technology Acceptance Model to Assess the Acceptability of mHealth Apps: Systematic Review.提高移动健康应用的可接受性——运用技术接受模型评估移动健康应用的可接受性:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 7;27:e66432. doi: 10.2196/66432.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding factors influencing the adoption of moxibustion techniques by the population: an extended study based on the UTAUT model.了解影响民众采用艾灸技术的因素:基于UTAUT模型的扩展研究
Front Public Health. 2025 May 21;13:1508716. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1508716. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Driving Factors in the Intention to Use the Virtual Nursing Home for the Elderly: A Modified UTAUT Model in the Chinese Context.老年人使用虚拟养老院意愿的驱动因素分析:中国背景下的修正UTAUT模型
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 17;11(16):2329. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162329.
2
Factors Predicting Older People's Acceptance of a Personalized Health Care Service App and the Effect of Chronic Disease: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.预测老年人对个性化医疗服务应用程序接受度的因素及慢性病的影响:横断面问卷调查研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Jun 21;6:e41429. doi: 10.2196/41429.
3
Acceptance of a Mobile Telepresence Robot, before Use, to Remotely Supervise Older Adults' Adapted Physical Activity.
接受移动远程呈现机器人,在使用前,远程监督老年人的适应性身体活动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3012. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043012.
4
Determinants of intention with remote health management service among urban older adults: A Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology perspective.城市老年人使用远程健康管理服务意向的决定因素:接受和使用技术的统一理论视角。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;11:1117518. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1117518. eCollection 2023.
5
Factors Influencing the Aged in the Use of Mobile Healthcare Applications: An Empirical Study in China.影响老年人使用移动医疗应用程序的因素:一项中国的实证研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 30;11(3):396. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030396.
6
Quality Characteristics and Acceptance Intention for Healthcare Kiosks: Perception of Elders from South Korea Based on the Extended Technology Acceptance Model.医疗亭的质量特征和接受意愿:基于扩展技术接受模型的韩国老年人感知
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 8;19(24):16485. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416485.
7
What Determines the Acceptance and Use of eHealth by Older Adults in Poland?是什么决定了波兰老年人对电子健康的接受和使用?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;19(23):15643. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315643.
8
Factors influencing the elderly's behavioural intention to use smart home technologies in Saudi Arabia.影响沙特阿拉伯老年人使用智能家居技术行为意向的因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 30;17(8):e0272525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272525. eCollection 2022.
9
Exploring Feasibility of mHealth to Manage Hypertension in Rural Black Older Adults: A Convergent Parallel Mixed Method Study.探索移动健康管理农村老年黑人高血压患者的可行性:一项聚合平行混合方法研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Aug 17;16:2135-2148. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S361032. eCollection 2022.
10
Factors influencing the elderly's adoption of mHealth: an empirical study using extended UTAUT2 model.影响老年人采用移动医疗的因素:使用扩展的UTAUT2 模型的实证研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jul 24;22(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01917-3.