Suppr超能文献

经口内镜下肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症既往肌切开术后出现症状性破裂肌切开术。

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for symptomatic blown-out myotomy following previous myotomy for achalasia.

作者信息

Zhang Zhao-Chao, Xu Jia-Qi, Pan Hai-Ting, Liu Xin-Yang, Chen Shi-Yao, Zhong Yun-Shi, Zhang Yi-Qun, Ma Li-Li, Hu Jian-Wei, Cai Ming-Yan, Qin Wen-Zheng, Li Quan-Lin, Chen Wei-Feng, Zhou Ping-Hong

机构信息

Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2025 Aug;57(8):876-882. doi: 10.1055/a-2552-8282. Epub 2025 Mar 28.

Abstract

Blown-out myotomy (BOM) may impair the discharge of esophageal contents, leading to recurrent symptoms following myotomy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of salvage peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for symptomatic BOM.Between August 2011 and August 2022, 77 patients with recurrent achalasia with BOM and 168 with recurrent achalasia without BOM underwent POEM and were retrospectively enrolled. Operation-related parameters were compared between the two groups.Salvage POEM was performed in patients with symptomatic BOM, with a mean procedure duration of 60.8 minutes. The mean hospital stay was 3.2 days. Procedure-related adverse events included 16 cases (20.8%) of Type I mucosal injury, 3 cases (3.9%) of Type II mucosal injury, 5 cases (6.5%) of pneumothorax, 2 cases (2.6%) of emphysema, and 2 cases (2.6%) of pneumoperitoneum. Three patients (3.9%) experienced major adverse events. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in the incidence of mucosal injury, gas-related adverse events, and major adverse events. Clinical success was equivalent between the two groups at the 2-year follow-up (85.7% vs. 92.3%; = 0.16).Based on this study, POEM could be considered as an effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic BOM.

摘要

扩张性肌切开术(BOM)可能会损害食管内容物的排出,导致肌切开术后症状复发。本研究旨在评估挽救性经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)治疗有症状的BOM的安全性和有效性。2011年8月至2022年8月,77例复发性贲门失弛缓症合并BOM患者和168例复发性贲门失弛缓症不合并BOM患者接受了POEM治疗,并进行回顾性纳入研究。比较两组的手术相关参数。对有症状的BOM患者进行挽救性POEM治疗,平均手术时间为60.8分钟。平均住院时间为3.2天。手术相关不良事件包括16例(20.8%)I型黏膜损伤、3例(3.9%)II型黏膜损伤、5例(6.5%)气胸、2例(2.6%)肺气肿和2例(2.6%)气腹。3例患者(3.9%)发生严重不良事件。两组在黏膜损伤、气体相关不良事件和严重不良事件的发生率方面无统计学显著差异。在2年随访时,两组的临床成功率相当(85.7%对92.3%;P = 0.16)。基于本研究,POEM可被视为有症状的BOM患者的一种有效治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验