Suppr超能文献

ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后进行抗凝治疗的安全性和有效性。

Safety and efficacy of post-procedure anticoagulation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

作者信息

Zhou Can, Zhang Minghui, Zhao Zixu, Li Enze, Zhao Yichen, Wang Hong, Luo Wei, Zheng Keyang, Liu Yu, Yin Chengqian, Zhang Xinyong, Gao Hai, Hou Xiaotong, Zhao Dong, Ma Changsheng

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, No.2 Anzhen Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.

Center for Clinical and Epidemiologic Research, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04639-2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a lethal complication of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The impact of post-procedure anticoagulants (PPAC) in STEMI-CS patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains unknown.

METHOD

In the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome registry (2014-2019), STEMI patients with CS on admission undergoing PPCI were stratified into two groups based on the use of PPAC or not. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality during hospitalization. Other outcomes including major bleeding were also investigated.

RESULTS

Of 36,873 patients with STEMI, 855 eligible patients with CS undergoing PPCI were included in our study, among which 614 patients were treated by PPAC and 241 were not. Adjusted by multi-variable Cox regression, PPAC was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality (14.9% vs. 30.3%; adjusted HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.97; p = 0.037), while a non-significant difference in major bleeding (4.6% vs. 7.0%; adjusted HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.36 to 3.05; p = 0.925) was observed between PPAC and non-PPAC. Consistent results were observed in the sensitivity analyses adjusted by propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested the use of PPAC in STEMI-CS patients undergoing PPCI was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality without increasing the risk of major bleeding.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02306616. Registered 29 November 2014.

摘要

引言

心源性休克(CS)是ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的一种致命并发症。在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的STEMI-CS患者中,术后抗凝剂(PPAC)的影响尚不清楚。

方法

在中国改善心血管疾病护理-急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究(2014-2019)中,入院时患有CS的STEMI患者在接受PPCI时根据是否使用PPAC分为两组。主要结局是住院期间的全因死亡率。还调查了包括大出血在内的其他结局。

结果

在36873例STEMI患者中,855例符合条件且接受PPCI的CS患者纳入我们的研究,其中614例患者接受了PPAC治疗,241例未接受。经多变量Cox回归调整后,PPAC与较低的住院全因死亡率风险相关(14.9%对30.3%;调整后风险比:0.60;95%置信区间:0.37至0.97;p = 0.037),而PPAC组与非PPAC组之间大出血差异无统计学意义(4.6%对7.0%;调整后风险比:1.05;95%置信区间:0.36至3.05;p = 0.925)。在倾向评分匹配和治疗权重逆概率调整的敏感性分析中观察到一致的结果。

结论

我们的研究表明,在接受PPCI的STEMI-CS患者中使用PPAC与较低的住院全因死亡率风险相关,且不增加大出血风险。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02306616。2014年11月29日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ef/11951534/49d4845e0b00/12872_2025_4639_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验