Zhao Yun, Goh Brian Kim Poh, Chok Aik Yong, Koh Ye Xin
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Academia, 20 College Road, Singapore.
Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2025 Mar 1;26(3):847-859. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2025.26.3.847.
Given the increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), this study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with pathological T4 (pT4) PDAC who received NAT followed by resection versus those who underwent upfront surgery.
We conducted a retrospective analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2015) to compare survival outcomes of T4N0-XM0 PDAC patients in NAT and upfront surgery groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were employed to assess overall survival (OS) and identify prognostic factors. Subgroup analyses were conducted within the NAT cohort to determine the impact of different NAT modalities, adjuvant therapy (AT), lymph node yield (LNY), and lymph node ratio (LNR) on OS in this cohort.
Of 8950 pT4 PDAC patients identified, 654 met the inclusion criteria (241 NAT vs. 413 upfront surgery). After PSM, 152 well-matched pairs remained. The median survival times were 26 months for NAT and 12 months for upfront surgery (P < 0.001). NAT was associated with significantly improved OS at all time points. Multivariate analysis identified NAT (P < 0.001) and AT (P = 0.002) as independent prognostic factors of improved OS. No significant OS difference was observed between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy or between NAT with and without AT. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in OS based on LNY cutoff values in either node-negative or node-positive cohorts but worse OS in node-positive patients with LNR ≥ 0.1 (P = 0.003).
NAT followed by resection significantly improves OS in patients with pT4 PDAC, even in the absence of complete pathological downstaging.
鉴于新辅助治疗(NAT)在局限性胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中的应用日益增加,本研究旨在评估接受NAT后再行切除术的病理T4(pT4)期PDAC患者与接受直接手术的患者的生存结局。
我们使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2004 - 2015年)进行回顾性分析,以比较NAT组和直接手术组中T4N0 - XM0期PDAC患者的生存结局。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡基线特征。使用Kaplan - Meier曲线和Cox回归分析评估总生存期(OS)并确定预后因素。在NAT队列中进行亚组分析,以确定不同NAT模式、辅助治疗(AT)、淋巴结收获量(LNY)和淋巴结比率(LNR)对该队列中OS的影响。
在8950例已确定的pT4期PDAC患者中,654例符合纳入标准(241例接受NAT,413例接受直接手术)。PSM后保留了152对匹配良好的病例。NAT组的中位生存时间为26个月,直接手术组为12个月(P < 0.001)。在所有时间点,NAT均与显著改善的OS相关。多因素分析确定NAT(P < 0.001)和AT(P = 0.002)是改善OS的独立预后因素。新辅助化疗与放化疗之间或有AT与无AT的NAT之间未观察到显著的OS差异。亚组分析显示,在淋巴结阴性或阳性队列中基于LNY临界值的OS无显著差异,但LNR≥0.1的淋巴结阳性患者的OS较差(P = 0.003)。
NAT后再行切除术可显著改善pT4期PDAC患者的OS,即使在没有完全病理降期的情况下也是如此。