Hunleth Jean, Kaufman Lindsey, Bunkley Emma, Burack Sarah, Miti Sam, Asante Comfort
Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., MO, 63110, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., MO, 63110, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2025 May;373:117931. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117931. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
In hospitals in Zambia, family members carry out intimate and care procedures, run errands, and offer emotional and practical support to patients. However, their presence also creates challenges when they use resources, take up space dedicated to patients, and contribute to disease spread. The COVID-19 pandemic brought such tensions into view and drove hospital administrators, clinicians, and researchers to draw a bright line between family as caregivers (considered necessary) and family as visitors (considered extraneous). In this article, we ask: If caregivers are not visitors, then who are visitors? What is the work of visiting? From 2020 to 2021, we carried out research in a Zambian pediatric hospital when visitors were not allowed to enter the hospital, but a singular caregiver was required at the bedside of each child admitted. Our findings from interviews with 44 healthcare workers and 30 caregivers revealed several themes-that the care work required in hospitals surpasses the ability of a single caregiver; that ephemeral encounters between caregivers and visitors facilitate sympathy driven care; and that witnessing need could catalyze and exhibit support. We expand on these themes, focusing on one grandmother's months-long stay with her granddaughter in the hospital, to show how caregiver, visitor, and healthcare worker roles were improvised and reworked. Ultimately, this research breaks down binaries commonly cited in discussions of family caregiving, such as essential and non-essential, helpful and wasteful, caregiver and visitor. This has policy implications because ignoring or dismissing visitors as extraneous will further disadvantage caregivers and patients and disenfranchise families.
在赞比亚的医院里,家庭成员会进行私密护理程序、跑腿办事,并为患者提供情感和实际支持。然而,他们的存在也带来了挑战,比如他们占用资源、占据留给患者的空间,还会造成疾病传播。新冠疫情使这些矛盾凸显出来,促使医院管理人员、临床医生和研究人员在作为护理者的家属(被认为是必要的)和作为探视者的家属(被认为是多余的)之间划清界限。在本文中,我们提出疑问:如果护理者不是探视者,那么探视者是谁?探视的作用是什么?2020年至2021年期间,我们在赞比亚一家儿科医院开展了研究,当时医院不允许探视者进入,但要求每个住院儿童床边有一名护理者。我们对44名医护人员和30名护理者的访谈结果揭示了几个主题——医院所需的护理工作超出了单一护理者的能力;护理者和探视者之间短暂的接触有助于激发同情驱动的护理;目睹需求可以激发并展现支持。我们围绕这些主题展开阐述,重点讲述了一位祖母在医院陪伴孙女长达数月的经历,以展示护理者、探视者和医护人员的角色是如何临时发挥和重新塑造的。最终,这项研究打破了家庭护理讨论中常见的二元对立,比如必要与非必要、有益与无益、护理者与探视者。这具有政策意义,因为将探视者视为多余而忽视或摒弃他们,将进一步使护理者和患者处于不利地位,并剥夺家庭的权利。