McCrorie Alan D, Stobart Hilary, Dodwell David, McIntosh Stuart A, Potter Shelley
The Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, Cambridge, UK.
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025 Mar 30;11(1):32. doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00744-9.
A systematic review undertaken to map the current landscape of locoregional de-escalation trials to inform future research. Online databases and trial registries were searched to identify ongoing, recently completed or published studies de-escalating surgery or radiotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. 97 trials evaluated de-escalation of surgery or radiotherapy in up to 94,866 participants. Surgery studies more commonly evaluated treatment omission/reduction after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) and de-escalation of nodal treatment. Radiotherapy studies were more frequently biomarker stratified. Patients were rarely involved in study design. Research questions focused on response-adjusted treatment after NST and omission/reduction of locoregional therapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk disease. Significant duplication was identified with multiple studies addressing similar questions. This systematic review demonstrates that the current de-escalation portfolio is inefficient, lacks patient focus and needs improvement. An internationally collaborative approach using innovative study designs and patient partnership will be essential to address this.
一项系统性综述旨在描绘局部区域降阶梯治疗试验的当前状况,以为未来研究提供信息。检索了在线数据库和试验注册库,以确定正在进行的、最近完成的或已发表的关于早期乳腺癌患者手术或放疗降阶梯的研究。97项试验评估了多达94866名参与者的手术或放疗降阶梯情况。手术研究更常评估新辅助全身治疗(NST)后治疗的省略/减少以及淋巴结治疗的降阶梯。放疗研究更频繁地按生物标志物分层。患者很少参与研究设计。研究问题集中在NST后的反应调整治疗以及低风险或中风险疾病患者局部区域治疗的省略/减少。发现多项研究针对类似问题存在显著重复。这项系统性综述表明,当前的降阶梯治疗组合效率低下,缺乏以患者为中心的理念,需要改进。采用创新研究设计和患者参与的国际合作方法对于解决这一问题至关重要。