Tao Yue, Zhu Yu-Ting, Li Hui, Zhang Qi-Xin, Zhu Yong
School of Biological and Food Engineering, Hefei Normal University, Hefei 230601, China.
Anim Welf. 2025 Mar 20;34:e21. doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.15. eCollection 2025.
Contrafreeloading (CFL) refers to animals' tendency to prefer obtaining food through effort rather than accessing food that is freely available. Researchers have proposed various hypotheses to explain this intriguing phenomenon, but few studies have provided a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing this behaviour. In this study, we observed the choice of alternative food containers in budgerigars () to investigate their CFL tendencies and the effects of pre-training, food deprivation, and effort required on the CFL tasks. The results showed that budgerigars did not exhibit significant difference in their first choices or the time interacting with less challenging versus more challenging food containers. Moreover, when evaluating each budgerigar's CFL level, only half of them were identified as strong contrafreeloaders. Thus, we suggest that budgerigars exhibit an intermediate CFL level that lies somewhere between a strong tendency and the absence of such behaviour. Furthermore, we also found that food-deprived budgerigars tended to select less challenging food containers, and pre-trained budgerigars were more likely to choose highly challenging food containers than moderately challenging food containers, which means that the requirement of only a reasonable effort (access to food from moderately challenging food containers in this study) and the experience of pre-training act to enhance their CFL levels, whereas the requirement of greater effort and the experience of food deprivation act to decrease their CFL levels. Studying animal CFL can help understand why animals choose to expend effort to obtain food rather than accessing it for free, and it also has implications for setting feeding environments to enhance the animal welfare of captive and domesticated animals.
反自由取食(CFL)是指动物倾向于通过努力获取食物,而不是获取免费可得的食物。研究人员提出了各种假设来解释这一有趣的现象,但很少有研究对影响这种行为的因素进行全面分析。在本研究中,我们观察了虎皮鹦鹉对替代食物容器的选择,以调查它们的反自由取食倾向以及预训练、食物剥夺和反自由取食任务所需努力的影响。结果表明,虎皮鹦鹉在首次选择或与较易获取食物的容器和较难获取食物的容器互动的时间上没有显著差异。此外,在评估每只虎皮鹦鹉的反自由取食水平时,只有一半被确定为强烈的反自由取食者。因此,我们认为虎皮鹦鹉表现出中等水平的反自由取食倾向,介于强烈倾向和无此行为之间。此外,我们还发现,食物被剥夺的虎皮鹦鹉倾向于选择较易获取食物的容器,而经过预训练的虎皮鹦鹉比选择中等难度食物容器更有可能选择高难度食物容器,这意味着只需要合理的努力(在本研究中从中等难度食物容器获取食物)和预训练的经验会提高它们的反自由取食水平,而更大努力的要求和食物剥夺的经验会降低它们的反自由取食水平。研究动物的反自由取食行为有助于理解为什么动物选择通过努力获取食物而不是免费获取食物,这也对设置饲养环境以提高圈养和家养动物的福利具有启示意义。