Kang Xiaoyan, Zhang Jiayu, Liu Junyu, Miao Junwang, Li Shuai, Kang Chunsong, Xue Jiping
Department of Ultrasound, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):1862-1872. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1419. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
Hypertension can cause left ventricular remodeling, and the degree of myocardial mechanical damage is different in patients with different geometries. Antihypertensive treatment can improve myocardial mechanics, but the improvement in myocardial mechanics in hypertensive patients with different geometries is not clear. This study aimed to assess the impact of antihypertensive therapy on myocardial mechanics in elderly patients diagnosed with primary hypertension, considering diverse left ventricular geometry patterns.
This study conducted a retrospective cohort analysis by randomly selecting 221 elderly patients diagnosed with primary hypertension from the outpatient department of Bethune Hospital in Shanxi Province, between January and June 2017. In this study, we included 191 elderly hypertensive patients (mean age 67.71±3.26 years, 98 women) who had successfully attained the target blood pressure levels through the administration of antihypertensive medications. The participants were stratified into distinct left ventricular geometry categories, namely normal geometry (NG; 54 cases), concentric remodeling (CR; 42 cases), eccentric hypertrophy (EH; 41 cases), and concentric hypertrophy (CH; 54 cases). The four groups were compared in terms of the global longitudinal strain (GLS) and its changes at baseline and 12 and 24 months after antihypertensive therapy.
The baseline GLS exhibited a gradual decrease in the following sequence: NG, CR, EH, and CH groups (all P<0.05). GLS demonstrated improvement in the CR, EH, and CH groups after 12 and 24 months of treatment; the GLS of CR group changed from -19.65%±1.27% to -20.72%±2.06%, then to -21.25%±1.99%; EH group changed from -18.76%±1.39% to -20.57%±1.75%, then to -21.37%±1.88%; CH group increased from -17.51%±1.42% to -20.04%±2.17%, then to -20.81%±2.51% (all P<0.05). After 24 months of treatment, GLS in the NG group improved from -20.84%±1.36% at baseline to -21.90%±1.99% (P<0.05). Within the CR, EH, and CH groups, the improvement in GLS (∆GLS) following 12 months of treatment exceeded ∆GLS between 12 months and 24 months of treatment (all P<0.05). ∆GLS after 12 months of treatment progressively increased in the order of NG, CR, EH, and CH groups (all P<0.05), while ∆GLS between 12 and 24 months of treatment exhibited similarity across the four groups (P>0.05).
The degree of myocardial mechanical damage is different in elderly primary hypertensive patients with different left ventricular geometries. After antihypertensive treatment, the myocardial mechanical damage continues to improve in all groups, and the concentric hypertrophy group had the most significant improvement.
高血压可导致左心室重构,不同几何形态的患者心肌机械损伤程度不同。降压治疗可改善心肌力学,但不同几何形态高血压患者的心肌力学改善情况尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估降压治疗对诊断为原发性高血压的老年患者心肌力学的影响,同时考虑不同的左心室几何形态模式。
本研究进行了一项回顾性队列分析,于2017年1月至6月从山西省白求恩医院门诊随机选取221例诊断为原发性高血压的老年患者。本研究纳入了191例老年高血压患者(平均年龄67.71±3.26岁,女性98例),这些患者通过服用降压药物成功达到了目标血压水平。参与者被分为不同的左心室几何形态类别,即正常几何形态(NG;54例)、向心性重构(CR;42例)、离心性肥厚(EH;41例)和向心性肥厚(CH;54例)。比较四组在基线时以及降压治疗后12个月和24个月时的整体纵向应变(GLS)及其变化。
基线时GLS按以下顺序逐渐降低:NG组、CR组、EH组和CH组(均P<0.05)。治疗12个月和24个月后,CR组、EH组和CH组的GLS有所改善;CR组的GLS从-19.65%±1.27%变为-20.72%±2.06%,然后变为-21.25%±1.99%;EH组从-18.76%±1.39%变为-20.57%±1.75%,然后变为-21.37%±1.88%;CH组从-17.51%±1.42%增加到-20.04%±2.17%,然后变为-20.81%±2.51%(均P<0.05)。治疗24个月后,NG组的GLS从基线时的-20.84%±1.36%改善至-21.90%±1.99%(P<0.05)。在CR组、EH组和CH组中,治疗12个月后的GLS改善(∆GLS)超过了治疗12个月至24个月期间的∆GLS(均P<0.05)。治疗12个月后的∆GLS按NG组、CR组、EH组和CH组的顺序逐渐增加(均P<0.05),而治疗12个月至24个月期间的∆GLS在四组中相似(P>0.05)。
不同左心室几何形态的老年原发性高血压患者心肌机械损伤程度不同。降压治疗后,所有组的心肌机械损伤持续改善,向心性肥厚组改善最为显著。