Schulz Angela, Schwering Christoph, Wibbeler Eva, Westermann Lena Marie, Hagenah Luca, Lezius Susanne, Jha Ashok, Hunt Abigail, Slasor Peter, Reisewitz Pascal, Nickel Miriam
Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
German Center for Child and Adolescent Health (DZKJ) Hamburg Partner Site, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 14;16:1516026. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1516026. eCollection 2025.
This study assessed the real-world effectiveness and safety of the enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), cerliponase alfa, to treat neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2) disease.
Data from the DEM-CHILD database were analyzed, comparing patients who initiated ERT outside clinical trials with natural history (NH) controls. Treated patients were matched 1:1 with NH controls on baseline age and combined motor-language (ML) score on the CLN2 clinical rating scale. Rate of ML score decline, time to unreversed 2-point decline or score of 0, and time to unreversed score of 0 were assessed. Safety was assessed in treated patients.
Twenty-four ERT-treated patients were eligible (mean [SD] follow-up: 106.7 [64.1] weeks); 21 matched to a NH control, with baseline mean (SD) age of 4.7 (1.9) years and mean (SD) ML score of 3.9 (1.6) points. ERT-treated patients had reduced likelihood of an unreversed ML 2-point decline or score of 0 (HR 0.08; 95% CI 0.02, 0.28; < 0.0001), and unreversed ML score of 0 (HR 0.07; 95% CI 0.01, 0.40; = 0.003) versus NH controls. Mean (SD) rate of ML score decline was 0.46 (0.43) versus 1.88 (1.45) points/48 weeks for ERT-treated and NH groups, respectively (mean difference: 1.42; 95% CI 0.74, 2.10; = 0.0003). Sixteen patients (67%) had treatment-related adverse events; the most common were pyrexia (50%), vomiting (33%), and nausea (21%). No ERT-treated patients died.
Cerliponase alfa for real-world CLN2 disease treatment slowed decline in motor and language function and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile.
本研究评估了酶替代疗法(ERT)药物cerliponase alfa治疗2型神经元蜡样脂褐质沉积症(CLN2)的真实疗效和安全性。
分析了DEM-CHILD数据库中的数据,将在临床试验之外开始接受ERT治疗的患者与自然病史(NH)对照进行比较。治疗患者与NH对照在基线年龄和CLN2临床评定量表上的运动-语言(ML)综合评分方面按1:1进行匹配。评估ML评分下降率、出现不可逆转的2分下降或评分为0的时间以及评分为0且不可逆转的时间。对接受治疗的患者进行安全性评估。
24例接受ERT治疗的患者符合条件(平均[标准差]随访时间:106.7[64.1]周);21例与NH对照匹配,基线平均(标准差)年龄为4.7(1.9)岁,平均(标准差)ML评分为3.9(1.6)分。与NH对照相比,接受ERT治疗的患者出现不可逆转的ML 2分下降或评分为0的可能性降低(风险比0.08;95%置信区间0.02,0.28;P<0.0001),且出现不可逆转的ML评分为0的可能性降低(风险比0.07;95%置信区间0.01,0.40;P = 0.003)。ERT治疗组和NH组ML评分的平均(标准差)下降率分别为0.46(0.43)和1.88(1.45)分/4周(平均差异:1.42;95%置信区间0.74,2.10;P = 0.0003)。16例患者(67%)出现与治疗相关的不良事件;最常见的是发热(50%)、呕吐(33%)和恶心(21%)。接受ERT治疗的患者无死亡病例。
用于治疗现实世界中CLN2疾病的cerliponase alfa减缓了运动和语言功能的下降,并显示出可接受的安全性。