Suppr超能文献

胰十二指肠切除术中δ血红蛋白与出血相关危险因素的回顾性分析

Retrospective analysis of delta hemoglobin and bleeding-related risk factors in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

作者信息

Lin Yi-Min, Yu Chao, Xian Guo-Zhe

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, Shandong Province, China.

Department of Emergency Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250011, Shandong Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):100999. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100999.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Objective and accurate assessment of blood loss during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is crucial for ensuring the safety and efficacy of the procedure. While the visual method remains the most common clinical metric, many scholars argue that it significantly differs from actual blood loss and is inherently subjective.

AIM

To assess blood loss in PD delta hemoglobin (ΔHb) and compare it with the visual method to predict bleeding-related risk factors.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 1722 patients who underwent PD from 2017 to 2022 at Shandong Provincial Hospital were divided into three groups: Open PD (OPD), laparoscopic PD (LPD), and conversion to OPD (CTOPD). Intraoperative ΔHb (IΔHb) was calculated preoperative and 72-hour-postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, and its association with visually obtained estimated blood loss (EBL) was analyzed. Perioperative ΔHb (PΔHb) was calculated preoperative and predischarge hemoglobin concentrations. We compared the differences in IΔHb and PΔHb among the three groups, and performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses of IΔHb and PΔHb.

RESULTS

The preoperative general information of patients showed no statistically significant difference among the three groups ( > 0.05). The IΔHb in the OPD, LPD, and CTOPD groups were 22.00 (12.00, 36.00), 21.00 (10.00, 33.00), and 33.00 (18.12, 52.24) g/L, respectively; And the PΔHb in the OPD, LPD, and CTOPD groups were 25.87 (13.51, 42.00), 25.00 (14.00, 45.00), and 37.48 (21.64, 59.65) g/L, respectively, values significantly differed ( < 0.05). IΔHb and EBL were significantly correlated ( = 0.337, < 0.001). The results of univariate and multivariate regression analyses indicated that American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification IV [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.330-37.811, = 0.049] and preoperative total bilirubin > 200 μmol/L (95%CI: 2.805-8.673, < 0.001) were independent risk factors for IΔHb ( < 0.05), and ASA classification IV (95%CI: 45.934-105.485, < 0.001), body mass index > 24 kg/m (95%CI: 1.285-9.890, = 0.011), and preoperative total bilirubin > 200 μmol/L (95%CI: 6.948-16.797, < 0.001) were independent risk factors for PΔHb ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is a correlation between IΔHb and EBL in PD, so we can assess the patients' intraoperative blood loss by the ΔHb method. ASA classification IV, body mass index > 24 kg/m², and preoperative total bilirubin > 200 μmol/L increased perioperative bleeding risk.

摘要

背景

客观准确地评估胰十二指肠切除术(PD)期间的失血量对于确保该手术的安全性和有效性至关重要。虽然视觉方法仍然是最常用的临床指标,但许多学者认为它与实际失血量有显著差异,并且本质上是主观的。

目的

评估PD中的失血量与血红蛋白变化量(ΔHb),并将其与视觉方法进行比较以预测出血相关的危险因素。

方法

在这项回顾性分析中,2017年至2022年在山东省立医院接受PD的1722例患者被分为三组:开放PD(OPD)、腹腔镜PD(LPD)和转为OPD(CTOPD)。术中ΔHb(IΔHb)通过术前和术后72小时的血红蛋白浓度计算得出,并分析其与视觉获得的估计失血量(EBL)的关联。围手术期ΔHb(PΔHb)通过术前和出院前的血红蛋白浓度计算得出。我们比较了三组之间IΔHb和PΔHb的差异,并对IΔHb和PΔHb进行了单因素和多因素回归分析。

结果

患者的术前一般信息在三组之间无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。OPD组、LPD组和CTOPD组的IΔHb分别为22.00(12.00,36.00)、21.00(10.00,33.00)和33.00(18.12,52.24)g/L;OPD组、LPD组和CTOPD组的PΔHb分别为25.87(13.51,42.00)、25.00(14.00,45.00)和37.48(21.64,59.65)g/L,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。IΔHb与EBL显著相关(r=0.337,P<0.001)。单因素和多因素回归分析结果表明,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级IV[95%置信区间(CI):2.330 - 37.811,P = 0.049]和术前总胆红素>200 μmol/L(95%CI:2.805 - 8.673,P<0.001)是IΔHb的独立危险因素(P<0.05),ASA分级IV(95%CI:45.934 - 105.485,P<0.001)、体重指数>24 kg/m²(95%CI:1.285 - 9.890,P = 0.011)和术前总胆红素>200 μmol/L(95%CI:6.948 - 16.797,P<0.001)是PΔHb的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。

结论

PD中IΔHb与EBL之间存在相关性,因此我们可以通过ΔHb方法评估患者的术中失血量。ASA分级IV、体重指数>24 kg/m²和术前总胆红素>200 μmol/L会增加围手术期出血风险。

相似文献

1
Retrospective analysis of delta hemoglobin and bleeding-related risk factors in pancreaticoduodenectomy.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):100999. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100999.
2
Hemoglobin loss method calculates blood loss during pancreaticoduodenectomy and predicts bleeding-related risk factors.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Feb 27;16(2):419-428. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.419.
6
Percentage change in hemoglobin level and morbidity in spine surgery patients.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):345-351. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE17301. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
8
Comparative analysis of clinical efficacy between laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Apr 21;102(16):e33588. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033588.

本文引用的文献

2
Methods of Blood Loss Quantification in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2023;66(4):133-137. doi: 10.14712/18059694.2024.7.
3
Diagnosis and management of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: A single-center experience of consecutive 1,096 pancreatoduodenectomies.
Pancreatology. 2023 Apr;23(3):235-244. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
5
Discrepancies in survival after conversion to open in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy.
Am J Surg. 2023 Apr;225(4):728-734. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.10.056. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
7
Accuracy of visual estimation of blood loss in obstetrics using clinical reconstructions: an observational simulation cohort study.
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022 May;50:103539. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2022.103539. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Analysis of the estimation of bleeding using several proposed haematometric equations.
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Feb;192(1):327-333. doi: 10.1007/s11845-022-02946-7. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
9
Incidence and Contemporary Management of Delayed Bleeding Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
World J Surg. 2022 May;46(5):1161-1171. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06451-x. Epub 2022 Jan 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验