• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症二次诊断的新方法:通过对患者和医生进行教育来克服传统肿瘤学实践中的挑战。

A New Approach to Cancer Second Opinions: Overcoming the Challenges of Conventional Oncology Practice by Providing Education to Patients and Physicians.

作者信息

Barrett William L, Leming Philip D, Hunt Jillian, Guinigundo Andrew, Uhrig Lana, Zon Robin, Jazieh Abdul R

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3151 Bellevue Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA.

Cincinnati Cancer Advisors, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02603-4.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-025-02603-4
PMID:40164950
Abstract

Second opinions for cancer diagnosis are frequently sought although they are of variable value to the patient and their primary oncologist. The oncology opinion service launched in 2020 without barriers frequently associated with conventional health systems. Financial barriers were removed; neither patient nor insurance was billed. The service is free of charge. Consult-only service provision, without providing therapy, allows objectivity and minimizes competition between oncology practices. Rapid communication with the treating oncologists allows for consensus treatment planning. Surveys were sent to patients and primary treating physicians assessing the value of the service and to assess the patient's experience. Between 1/2020 and 12/2023, surveys were sent to patients and their physicians. 539/1244 patients and 186/1319 physicians returned the completed survey. Surveys were scored from 1 to 5 with 5 being the best. Patient surveys rated "perceived value" at 4.95. Physicians scored "helpfulness" at 4.84. Physicians scored 4.07 for the question "enhances your relationship with patient." This model of providing second opinions offers valuable services to patients and their treating physicians without adding additional financial burden or disturbing their care process.

摘要

尽管癌症诊断的二次诊断意见对患者及其主治肿瘤医生的价值各不相同,但人们仍经常寻求这种意见。2020年推出的肿瘤学意见服务没有传统医疗系统常见的障碍。消除了经济障碍;患者和保险公司均无需付费。该服务免费。仅提供咨询服务,不提供治疗,这样可以保持客观性,并最大限度地减少肿瘤学实践之间的竞争。与主治肿瘤医生的快速沟通有助于达成一致的治疗计划。向患者和主治医生发送了调查问卷,以评估该服务的价值并了解患者的体验。在2020年1月至2023年12月期间,向患者及其医生发送了调查问卷。539名患者中的1244名以及186名医生中的1319名返回了完整的调查问卷。调查问卷的评分从1到5,5分为最佳。患者调查问卷对“感知价值”的评分是4.95。医生对“帮助程度”的评分是4.84。对于“增强你与患者的关系”这一问题,医生的评分是4.07。这种提供二次诊断意见的模式为患者及其主治医生提供了有价值的服务,而不会增加额外的经济负担或干扰他们的护理过程。

相似文献

1
A New Approach to Cancer Second Opinions: Overcoming the Challenges of Conventional Oncology Practice by Providing Education to Patients and Physicians.癌症二次诊断的新方法:通过对患者和医生进行教育来克服传统肿瘤学实践中的挑战。
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02603-4.
2
Patient-Driven Second Opinions in Oncology: A Systematic Review.肿瘤患者导向的第二诊疗意见:系统评价。
Oncologist. 2017 Oct;22(10):1197-1211. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0429. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
3
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
4
Overcoming communication challenges in integrative supportive cancer care: The integrative physician, the psycho-oncologist, and the patient.克服综合支持性癌症护理中的沟通挑战:综合医生、心理肿瘤学家与患者
Complement Ther Med. 2016 Dec;29:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Sep 4.
5
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
6
US Radiation Oncologists (Re)Defined: An American Society for Radiation Oncology Scope of Practice Study.美国放射肿瘤学家的(重新)定义:美国放射肿瘤学会实践范围研究
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Feb 1;109(2):335-343. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.029. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
7
A Survey of the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG): Are the Oncologists Trained for Decision Making on Geriatric Cancer Patients?土耳其肿瘤学组(TOG)的一项调查:肿瘤学家是否接受过针对老年癌症患者决策的培训?
Cureus. 2024 Jul 14;16(7):e64533. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64533. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Second Opinion Seeking in Paediatric Oncology: Motivations and Predictors.儿科肿瘤学中的二次意见寻求:动机和预测因素。
Psychooncology. 2024 Nov;33(11):e70011. doi: 10.1002/pon.70011.
9
Attitudes towards second opinion services in cancer care: a nationwide survey of oncologists in Korea.癌症护理中对二次诊断服务的态度:韩国肿瘤学家的全国性调查。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 May;46(5):441-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw016. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
10
When Should You Trust Your Doctor? Establishing a Theoretical Model to Evaluate the Value of Second Opinion Visits.何时应该信任你的医生?建立一个理论模型来评估二次诊疗意见的价值。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Apr 8;5(2):502-510. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.01.014. eCollection 2021 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-provider communication during second opinion consultations in oncology.患者-提供者在肿瘤学第二意见咨询中的沟通。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Oct;104(10):2490-2497. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Why Do Cancer Patients Have Difficulties Evaluating the Need for a Second Opinion and What Is Needed to Lower the Barrier? A Qualitative Study.为什么癌症患者难以评估是否需要二次意见,以及需要采取什么措施来降低门槛?一项定性研究。
Oncol Res Treat. 2018;41(12):769-773. doi: 10.1159/000492390. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
3
Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions.
医生职业倦怠:成因、后果及应对策略。
J Intern Med. 2018 Jun;283(6):516-529. doi: 10.1111/joim.12752. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
4
Patient-Driven Second Opinions in Oncology: A Systematic Review.肿瘤患者导向的第二诊疗意见:系统评价。
Oncologist. 2017 Oct;22(10):1197-1211. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0429. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
5
Scientific literature: Information overload.科学文献:信息过载。
Nature. 2016 Jul 21;535(7612):457-8. doi: 10.1038/nj7612-457a.
6
Patient-initiated second opinions: systematic review of characteristics and impact on diagnosis, treatment, and satisfaction.患者发起的二次意见:对特征和对诊断、治疗和满意度的影响的系统评价。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 May;89(5):687-96. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.02.015.
7
Can cancer patients seeking a second opinion get better care?癌症患者寻求第二诊疗意见能否得到更好的治疗?
Am J Manag Care. 2013 May;19(5):380-7.
8
Second medical opinions: the views of oncology patients and their physicians.第二医疗意见:肿瘤患者及其医生的观点。
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Sep;18(9):1199-205. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0742-z. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
9
Cancer patients seeking a second surgical opinion: results of a study on motives, needs, and expectations.寻求二次手术意见的癌症患者:一项关于动机、需求和期望的研究结果
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1492-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.058.
10
Motives for seeking a second opinion in orthopaedic surgery.在骨科手术中寻求二次诊断的动机。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001 Oct;6(4):195-201. doi: 10.1258/1355819011927486.