Lahouati Marin, Brousse Xavier, Bientz Léa, Chadefaux Grégoire, Dubois Véronique, Cazanave Charles, Xuereb Fabien
CHU de Bordeaux, Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Bordeaux, F-33076, France.
Université de Bordeaux, Inserm, UMR1034, Biology of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pessac, France.
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10834-5.
Linezolid and vancomycin are both recommended for the treatment of staphylococcal-associated central nervous system (CNS) infections. However, to date, no data are available comparing the outcomes of patients treated with vancomycin or linezolid for these infections. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of treatment failure and adverse events (AEs) associated with vancomycin and linezolid in staphylococcal-associated CNS infections.
This retrospective monocentric observational study was conducted between 01/01/2015 and 31/12/2023. All patients with a confirmed staphylococcal associated CNS infection and treated with vancomycin or linezolid were included. Failure of antimicrobial treatment was the primary outcome of interest, defined by a composite criteria: persistence of infection (i.e. positive culture after > 72 h of antimicrobial treatment active on the isolated bacteria), relapse of infection (i.e. new infection with the same bacteria involved in the initial episode) or infection related death. Second outcome of interest was AE incidence related to linezolid or vancomycin. Outcomes were analysed using survival analysis techniques and propensity score.
Ninety one patients were included: 51 in vancomycin group and 40 in linezolid group. Infections were mainly meningitis (n = 71; 78%). Median duration of linezolid or vancomycin treatment was 7 days (IQR 4; 13). Treatment failure occurred in 18.6% (n = 17) of patients (infection persisted in 9.8% of patients (n = 9), infection relapsed in 6.6% (n = 6) and infection caused a fatal outcome in 4.4% (n = 4). In the Cox proportional hazards regression model, vancomycin was not associated with treatment failure (aHR 2.90; 95% CI [0.93-9.30]; p = 0.066). Using propensity score, vancomycin was associated with treatment failure (HR 3.28; 95% CI [1.02-10.54]; p = 0.045). Treatment with vancomycin was also associated with AE (HR 8.42; CI 95% [2.44;29.10]; p = 0.019).
Patients treated with vancomycin for staphylococcal-associated CNS infections seems to have a higher risk of treatment failure and AE compared to those treated with linezolid. However, given the low statistical power and the observational nature of this study, further research is needed to confirm these findings.
利奈唑胺和万古霉素均被推荐用于治疗葡萄球菌相关的中枢神经系统(CNS)感染。然而,迄今为止,尚无数据比较接受万古霉素或利奈唑胺治疗这些感染的患者的治疗结果。本研究的目的是比较万古霉素和利奈唑胺在葡萄球菌相关CNS感染中治疗失败和不良事件(AE)的发生率。
本回顾性单中心观察性研究于2015年1月1日至2023年12月31日进行。纳入所有确诊为葡萄球菌相关CNS感染并接受万古霉素或利奈唑胺治疗的患者。抗菌治疗失败是主要关注的结果,由综合标准定义:感染持续存在(即对分离出的细菌有活性的抗菌治疗>72小时后培养仍为阳性)、感染复发(即与初始发作中涉及的相同细菌引起的新感染)或感染相关死亡。第二个关注的结果是与利奈唑胺或万古霉素相关的AE发生率。使用生存分析技术和倾向评分分析结果。
纳入91例患者:万古霉素组51例,利奈唑胺组40例。感染主要为脑膜炎(n = 71;78%)。利奈唑胺或万古霉素治疗的中位持续时间为7天(四分位间距4;13)。18.6%(n = 17)的患者发生治疗失败(9.8%(n = 9)的患者感染持续存在,6.6%(n = 6)的患者感染复发,4.4%(n = 4)的患者感染导致致命结局)。在Cox比例风险回归模型中,万古霉素与治疗失败无关(校正风险比2.90;95%置信区间[0.93 - 9.30];p = 0.066)。使用倾向评分时,万古霉素与治疗失败相关(风险比3.28;95%置信区间[1.02 - 10.54];p = 0.045)。万古霉素治疗也与AE相关(风险比8.42;95%置信区间[2.44;29.10];p = 0.019)。
与接受利奈唑胺治疗的患者相比,接受万古霉素治疗葡萄球菌相关CNS感染的患者似乎有更高的治疗失败和AE风险。然而,鉴于本研究的统计效力低和观察性质,需要进一步研究来证实这些发现。