• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错失预防良机:高危子宫内膜癌患者基因评估完成情况的差异

Missing a chance to prevent: disparities in completion of genetic evaluation in high-risk patients with endometrial cancer.

作者信息

Holtzman Sharonne, Velasquez Jessica, Saleh Mona, Cohen Samantha, Prasad-Hayes Monica, Zeligs Kristen, Blank Stephanie V

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Mar;36(2):e94. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e94.

DOI:10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e94
PMID:40165392
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11964958/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The primary goal of this study is to examine disparities in high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) patients in relation to rates of genetic referrals (GR), testing (GT), and counseling (GC).

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed EC between January 1, 2014 and September 1, 2020 at a single institution. Patients were defined as high-risk EC patients when they were 1) diagnosed at 50 years or younger, 2) had a positive family history for cancer or 3) had evidence of loss of mismatch repair protein expression on tumor immunohistochemistry. Rates of GR, GT and GC were analyzed based on race, ethnicity, primary language and insurance status.

RESULTS

During the study period, 674 patients were diagnosed with EC and 249 (36.9%) were considered high-risk EC patients. Among high-risk patients, 128 (51.2%) were referred to GT and GC. Of those referred, 103 (80.5%) underwent GT and 85 (66.4%) completed GC. Out of all high-risk patients, 20 (18.4%) were positive for LS on GT and 29 (28.2%) had VUS results. In multivariate analysis, the odds of GT and GC referral were lower among patients who identified as Hispanic (OR=0.40; 95% CI=0.19-0.87; p=0.020). Patients who identified as black were less likely to receive GC when compared to patients of other races (p=0.030).

CONCLUSION

It is our hope that through this data we will increase awareness around existing disparities in genetic evaluation for patients with EC and ultimately create strategies to improve equitable access to care for all patients.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目标是探讨高危子宫内膜癌(EC)患者在基因转诊率(GR)、检测率(GT)和咨询率(GC)方面的差异。

方法

这是一项对2014年1月1日至2020年9月1日期间在单一机构新诊断为EC的患者进行的回顾性分析。当患者符合以下条件时被定义为高危EC患者:1)50岁及以下确诊;2)有癌症家族史阳性;3)肿瘤免疫组化显示错配修复蛋白表达缺失。根据种族、民族、主要语言和保险状况分析GR、GT和GC的比率。

结果

在研究期间,674例患者被诊断为EC,249例(36.9%)被认为是高危EC患者。在高危患者中,128例(51.2%)被转诊进行GT和GC。在那些被转诊的患者中,103例(80.5%)接受了GT,85例(66.4%)完成了GC。在所有高危患者中,20例(18.4%)GT检测显示林奇综合征(LS)阳性,29例(28.2%)有意义未明的变异(VUS)结果。在多变量分析中,自我认定为西班牙裔的患者接受GT和GC转诊的几率较低(比值比[OR]=0.40;95%置信区间[CI]=0.19-0.87;p=0.020)。与其他种族的患者相比,自我认定为黑人的患者接受GC的可能性较小(p=0.030)。

结论

我们希望通过这些数据提高对EC患者基因评估中现有差异的认识,并最终制定策略,以改善所有患者获得公平医疗服务的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0393/11964958/21de18446ae7/jgo-36-e94-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0393/11964958/f0eedb395ba7/jgo-36-e94-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0393/11964958/33295a5229c2/jgo-36-e94-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0393/11964958/82c840466bcd/jgo-36-e94-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0393/11964958/21de18446ae7/jgo-36-e94-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0393/11964958/f0eedb395ba7/jgo-36-e94-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0393/11964958/33295a5229c2/jgo-36-e94-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0393/11964958/82c840466bcd/jgo-36-e94-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0393/11964958/21de18446ae7/jgo-36-e94-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Missing a chance to prevent: disparities in completion of genetic evaluation in high-risk patients with endometrial cancer.错失预防良机:高危子宫内膜癌患者基因评估完成情况的差异
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Mar;36(2):e94. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e94.
2
Missing a chance to prevent: disparities in completion of genetic evaluation in high-risk patients with endometrial cancer.错失预防机会:高危子宫内膜癌患者基因评估完成情况的差异
J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Apr 25. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e65.
3
Missed opportunities: Genetic counseling and testing among an ethnically diverse cohort of women with endometrial cancer.错失的机会:在一个种族多样化的子宫内膜癌女性队列中进行遗传咨询和检测。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Oct;151(1):153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.023. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
4
Impact of an immunohistochemistry-based universal screening protocol for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer on genetic counseling and testing.基于免疫组织化学的子宫内膜癌林奇综合征通用筛查方案对遗传咨询和检测的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Apr;137(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.535. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
5
Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Genetic Testing May be Mitigated by Counseling.种族差异可能通过咨询来减轻乳腺癌基因检测的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):5197-5204. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15434-2. Epub 2024 May 29.
6
Endometrial cancer patients and compliance with genetic counseling: room for improvement.子宫内膜癌患者与遗传咨询依从性:仍有改进空间。
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Dec;123(3):532-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Oct 2.
7
Universal screening for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancers: frequency of germline mutations and identification of patients with Lynch-like syndrome.林奇综合征在子宫内膜癌中的普遍筛查:种系突变的频率及林奇样综合征患者的鉴定。
Hum Pathol. 2017 Dec;70:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
8
Improving genetic testing following abnormal mismatch repair immunohistochemistry results in endometrial cancer.改善子宫内膜癌异常错配修复免疫组化结果后的基因检测。
Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Aug;175:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
9
Outcomes of screening endometrial cancer patients for Lynch syndrome by patient-administered checklist.通过患者自行填写检查表筛查子宫内膜癌患者林奇综合征的结果。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Dec;131(3):619-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
10
Success of referral to genetic counseling after positive lynch syndrome screening test.林奇综合征筛查试验呈阳性后转诊至遗传咨询的成功率。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;32(9):1345-1348. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2849-x. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiomics and Molecular Classification in Endometrial Cancer (The ROME Study): A Step Forward to a Simplified Precision Medicine.子宫内膜癌的影像组学与分子分类(ROME研究):迈向简化精准医学的一步
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 7;10(12):2464. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122464.
2
Association of Disparities in Family History and Family Cancer History in the Electronic Health Record With Sex, Race, Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity, and Language Preference in 2 Large US Health Care Systems.电子健康记录中家族病史和家族癌症病史的差异与性别、种族、西班牙裔或拉丁裔以及在 2 个大型美国医疗保健系统中的语言偏好的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2234574. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.34574.
3
Disparities in gynecologic cancer genetics evaluation.
妇科癌症遗传学评估中的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
4
Universal screening of both endometrial and colon cancers increases the detection of Lynch syndrome.对子宫内膜癌和结肠癌进行普遍筛查会增加林奇综合征的检出率。
Cancer. 2018 Aug 1;124(15):3145-3153. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31534. Epub 2018 May 11.
5
Minority participation in Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Studies.少数族裔参与妇科肿瘤学组(GOG)研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Aug;138(2):441-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 May 23.
6
Genetic testing by cancer site: uterus.按癌症部位进行的基因检测:子宫。
Cancer J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):338-42. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182610cc2.
7
Disparities in the allocation of treatment in advanced ovarian cancer: are there certain patient characteristics associated with nonstandard therapy?晚期卵巢癌治疗分配的差异:是否存在某些与非标准治疗相关的患者特征?
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;119(1):68-77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823d4006.
8
Evaluating women with ovarian cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: missed opportunities.评估卵巢癌患者的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 突变:错失的机会。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;115(5):945-952. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181da08d7.
9
Calculation of risk of colorectal and endometrial cancer among patients with Lynch syndrome.林奇综合征患者结直肠癌和子宫内膜癌风险的计算。
Gastroenterology. 2009 Nov;137(5):1621-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.039. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
10
Insurance status and the use of guideline therapy in the treatment of selected cancers.保险状况与特定癌症治疗中指南疗法的应用。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9079-88. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.1297. Epub 2005 Nov 21.