Thornton Sara A, Freeman Will, Jupe Lucy L, Newth Julia L, Reeves Jonathan P, Wood Kevin A, Woroniecki Stephen
Ecosystem Health and Social Dimensions, WWT Slimbridge Wetland Centre, Slimbridge, UK.
Conserv Biol. 2025 Apr;39(2):e70002. doi: 10.1111/cobi.70002.
Although the importance of social science to conservation practice and policy is well accepted, social scientists remain in the minority in conservation nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). We explored how social science has started to inform the work of WWT, an NGO dedicated to the restoration of wetlands for people and nature. Through reflections on our experiences working in WWT's social dimensions unit and interviews with colleagues from different backgrounds and roles, we critically reflected on the integration of social science in wetland conservation science, advocacy, and practice. Social science was a relatively new and marginal research domain for WWT. There was confusion within the organization around what social science entails and its value for conservation practice. We and our colleagues have faced challenges communicating across disciplines and establishing a rigorous ethical review process for social science research. It is difficult to navigate under a scarcity mindset in conservation (i.e., that there is not enough time, resources, or funding) and at the same time to build collaborations and long-term relationships and contribute to wider environmental and social movements. Social science integration brought multiple opportunities to WWT, including creating and showing impact, building support, and broadening funding opportunities. Social science was seen to inform campaigns and wetland restoration policy. Further integration of social science is needed at WWT. To achieve this, we recommend building confidence in the role of social science across teams through further training to improve organizational competency in social science theory and methods. We emphasize the need for thoughtful, long-term approaches alongside shorter term approaches to wetland restoration. We recommend that conservation NGOs promote practices of self-reflection to recognize the inherently political nature of conservation. We expect that our experiences and recommendations are relevant for other organizations. We invite other perspectives and hope our reflections lead to further conversations in the conservation sector.
尽管社会科学对保护实践和政策的重要性已得到广泛认可,但在保护非政府组织(NGO)中,社会科学家仍占少数。我们探讨了社会科学如何开始为世界水鸟保护组织(WWT)的工作提供信息,该组织致力于为人类和自然恢复湿地。通过反思我们在WWT社会层面部门的工作经历以及对来自不同背景和角色的同事的访谈,我们批判性地思考了社会科学在湿地保护科学、宣传和实践中的整合。社会科学对WWT来说是一个相对较新的边缘研究领域。该组织内部对于社会科学的内涵及其对保护实践的价值存在困惑。我们和同事在跨学科交流以及为社会科学研究建立严格的伦理审查过程中面临挑战。在保护领域的稀缺思维模式下(即没有足够的时间、资源或资金)开展工作很困难,同时还要建立合作关系和长期联系,并为更广泛的环境和社会运动做出贡献。社会科学的整合给WWT带来了多重机遇,包括创造并展示影响力、获得支持以及拓宽资金来源。社会科学被认为为宣传活动和湿地恢复政策提供了信息。WWT需要进一步整合社会科学。为实现这一目标,我们建议通过进一步培训来增强各团队对社会科学作用的信心,以提高组织在社会科学理论和方法方面的能力。我们强调在湿地恢复工作中,除了短期方法外,还需要有深思熟虑的长期方法。我们建议保护非政府组织推广自我反思的做法,以认识到保护工作本质上的政治性。我们期望我们的经验和建议对其他组织具有借鉴意义。我们欢迎其他观点,并希望我们的思考能在保护领域引发进一步的讨论。