• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

球囊椎体后凸成形术与保守治疗相比治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty compared to conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Encalada Sebastian, Hunt Christine, Duszynski Belinda, Salmasi Vafi, Scholten Paul, Zhao Zirong, Rappard George, Rivers William Evan, Vu To-Nhu, Lobel Steven, Popescu Adrian, Prokop Larry J, Kreiner D Scott

机构信息

Department of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

International Pain and Spine Intervention Society, Hinsdale, IL, USA.

出版信息

Interv Pain Med. 2025 Mar 15;4(1):100569. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100569. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100569
PMID:40165882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11957677/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are a common and often debilitating condition that significantly impacts quality of life and healthcare costs. While conservative treatment is often pursued initially after fracture, some patients experience severe pain refractory to conservative treatment. In these cases, minimally invasive vertebral augmentation procedures like balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) offer an alternative, but the benefits of BKP compared to conservative treatment remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of BKP versus conservative treatment for pain, quality of life, and function in patients with painful OVCFs.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Pain improvement up to 12 months after BKP.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Functional improvement, adverse events, and vertebral body height restoration.

METHODS

This analysis included randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies in which at least 100 participants reported pain outcomes following BKP for OVCFs. The risk of bias was assessed using standard tools, and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

BKP demonstrated superior pain reduction versus conservative treatment at 1 month (mean difference (MD): 2.32 [-3.65;-0.99], P < 0.001), 3 months (MD: 1.19 [-2.14; -0.24], P = 0.014), 6 months (MD: 1.34 [-2.65; -0.04], P = 0.044), and 12 months (MD: 1.11 [-1.96;-0.26], P = 0.029), with the largest effect observed at 1 month. Disability improvements were significant at 1 month (standardized mean difference (SMD): 1.08 [-1.67; -0.48], P < 0.001) and 3 months (SMD: 0.50 [-0.96; -0.04], P = 0.032), but not at 6 or 12 months. No significant differences were found in the risk for new vertebral compression fractures between both groups (odds ratio (OR): 1.36 [0.51; 3.64], P = 0.54). According to the GRADE system, moderate certainty evidence indicates that BKP provides superior pain relief compared to conservative treatment at all time points from 1 to 12 months.

CONCLUSION

BKP showed superior pain reduction compared to conservative treatment from 1 to 12 months and improved disability at 1 and 3 months, with moderate certainty evidence.

摘要

背景

骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)是一种常见且往往使人衰弱的病症,会显著影响生活质量和医疗成本。虽然骨折后最初通常采用保守治疗,但一些患者经历了对保守治疗难治的严重疼痛。在这些情况下,像球囊后凸成形术(BKP)这样的微创椎体强化手术提供了一种替代方法,但与保守治疗相比,BKP的益处仍不明确。

目的

评估BKP与保守治疗对疼痛性OVCFs患者的疼痛、生活质量和功能的有效性。

主要结局

BKP后长达12个月的疼痛改善情况。

次要结局

功能改善、不良事件和椎体高度恢复。

方法

该分析纳入了随机对照试验和前瞻性比较研究,其中至少100名参与者报告了BKP治疗OVCFs后的疼痛结局。使用标准工具评估偏倚风险,并使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法评估证据的确定性。

结果

与保守治疗相比,BKP在1个月(平均差值(MD):2.32[-3.65;-0.99],P<0.001)、3个月(MD:1.19[-2.14;-0.24],P = 0.014)、6个月(MD:1.34[-2.65;-0.04],P = 0.044)和12个月(MD:1.11[-1.96;-0.26],P = 0.029)时显示出更显著的疼痛减轻,在1个月时观察到最大效果。残疾改善在1个月(标准化平均差值(SMD):1.08[-1.67;-0.48],P<0.001)和3个月(SMD:0.50[-0.96;-0.04],P = 0.032)时显著,但在6个月或12个月时不显著。两组之间新椎体压缩骨折的风险没有显著差异(比值比(OR):1.36[0.51;3.64],P = 0.54)。根据GRADE系统,中等确定性证据表明,与保守治疗相比,BKP在1至12个月的所有时间点都能提供更好的疼痛缓解。

结论

有中等确定性证据表明,与保守治疗相比,BKP在1至12个月时显示出更显著的疼痛减轻,在1个月和3个月时改善了残疾情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d3/11957677/56de8dc9a35d/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d3/11957677/f29aa1bf1821/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d3/11957677/5afd6173b2c9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d3/11957677/7fe6ca45c453/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d3/11957677/9cdb2b9d1ebd/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d3/11957677/56de8dc9a35d/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d3/11957677/f29aa1bf1821/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d3/11957677/5afd6173b2c9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d3/11957677/7fe6ca45c453/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d3/11957677/9cdb2b9d1ebd/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10d3/11957677/56de8dc9a35d/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty compared to conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.球囊椎体后凸成形术与保守治疗相比治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interv Pain Med. 2025 Mar 15;4(1):100569. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100569. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
A prospective, international, randomized, noninferiority study comparing an implantable titanium vertebral augmentation device versus balloon kyphoplasty in the reduction of vertebral compression fractures (SAKOS study).一项前瞻性、国际性、随机、非劣效性研究,比较了植入式钛椎体增强装置与球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术在减少椎体压缩性骨折方面的疗效(SAKOS 研究)。
Spine J. 2019 Nov;19(11):1782-1795. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
Percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.经皮椎体成形术和经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折:系统评价与成本效益分析
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(17):1-290. doi: 10.3310/hta18170.
4
Does Percutaneous Vertebroplasty or Balloon Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Increase the Incidence of New Vertebral Fractures? A Meta-Analysis.经皮椎体成形术或球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折会增加新发椎体骨折的发生率吗?一项荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E13-E28.
5
Balloon kyphoplasty: an evidence-based analysis.球囊椎体后凸成形术:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(12):1-45. Epub 2004 Dec 1.
6
[Comparison of clinical and radiological data in the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using radiofrequency kyphoplasty or balloon kyphoplasty].[使用射频椎体后凸成形术或球囊椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者的临床和放射学数据比较]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2012 Feb;150(1):56-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280122. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
7
Comparison of high-viscosity cement vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.高粘度骨水泥椎体成形术与球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较
Pain Physician. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):E187-94.
8
Height and volume restoration in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a biomechanical comparison of standard balloon kyphoplasty versus Tektona® in a cadaveric fracture model.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的高度和体积恢复:尸体骨折模型中标准球囊后凸成形术与Tektona®的生物力学比较
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jan 13;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03899-7.
9
A randomized trial of balloon kyphoplasty and nonsurgical management for treating acute vertebral compression fractures: vertebral body kyphosis correction and surgical parameters.一项关于球囊后凸成形术与非手术治疗急性椎体压缩骨折的随机试验:椎体后凸矫正及手术参数
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 20;38(12):971-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828e8e22.
10
Height restoration and sustainability using bilateral vertebral augmentation systems for vertebral compression fractures: a cadaveric study.使用双侧椎体强化系统治疗椎体压缩骨折的身高恢复及可持续性:一项尸体研究
Spine J. 2022 Dec;22(12):2072-2081. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.06.011. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Conservative Treatments in the Management of Acute Painful Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.保守治疗急性疼痛性椎体压缩性骨折的管理:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432041. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32041.
2
Risk Factors for Residual Back Pain After PVP Treatment for osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折后残留腰痛的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Dec;180:e484-e493. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.094. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Survival following vertebral compression fractures in population over 65 years old.
65 岁以上人群椎体压缩性骨折后的生存情况。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Aug;35(8):1609-1617. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02445-4. Epub 2023 May 26.
4
Vertebral augmentation: an overview.椎体强化术:概述。
Skeletal Radiol. 2023 Oct;52(10):1911-1920. doi: 10.1007/s00256-022-04092-8. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
5
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3 Treatment Arms for Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Comparison of Improvement in Pain, Adjacent-Level Fractures, and Quality of Life Between Vertebroplasty, Kyphoplasty, and Nonoperative Management.椎体压缩骨折三种治疗方法的系统评价与荟萃分析:椎体成形术、后凸成形术与非手术治疗在疼痛改善、相邻节段骨折及生活质量方面的比较
JBJS Rev. 2021 Oct 25;9(10):01874474-202110000-00006. doi: e21.00045.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
7
Kyphoplasty for Elderly Patients With Vertebral Compression Fractures-Do We Save Lives? Mortality Rates Analysis Comparison in a Long-Term Follow-Up Cohort.老年椎体压缩性骨折患者的椎体后凸成形术——我们挽救生命了吗?长期随访队列中的死亡率分析比较
Global Spine J. 2022 Sep;12(7):1443-1448. doi: 10.1177/2192568220982282. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
8
Percutaneous cement augmentation in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) in the elderly: a systematic review.经皮骨水泥强化治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体骨折(OVFs):系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Jul;29(7):1553-1572. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06391-x. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
9
Current Concepts in the Management of Vertebral Compression Fractures.当前椎体压缩性骨折治疗的理念。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Mar 20;24(5):16. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-00849-9.
10
Number Needed to Treat with Vertebral Augmentation to Save a Life.需要进行椎体强化治疗的人数以挽救生命。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jan;41(1):178-182. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6367. Epub 2019 Dec 19.