Maciaszek Malgorzata, Steinfort Brendan, Harrington Timothy, Faulder Ken, Assaad Nazih, Dexter Mark, Ma Alice
Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2025 Mar 28;7(1):e000290. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000290. eCollection 2025.
To assess recurrence rates, procedural outcomes and patient outcomes following middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization for the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH).
Retrospective case series.
Two tertiary neurosurgical referral centers in Sydney, Australia.
13 adult patients (mean age±SD, 68.5±9.5 years, 11 male) with 17 cSDHs (measuring 13.8±4.5 mm) undergoing MMA embolization alone (8/13) or with surgical evacuation (5/13) for cSDH. There were no exclusion criteria.
Embolization was performed via femoral access, using either liquid embolic, polyvinyl alcohol particles, coils, or a combination of agents. Embolization was done either as the sole treatment or with surgical evacuation.
Primary outcomes were recurrence or increase in hematoma size requiring surgical evacuation. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications, hematoma size at follow-up, and patient clinical outcomes.
No procedural complications occurred. 12 patients were discharged home at baseline neurological function, and one was discharged to an aged care facility with significant disability. At follow-up (mean=8.7 weeks), combined embolization with surgical evacuation led to hematoma size reduction (14.3±2.6 mm to 5.7±6.5 mm, p<0.01), while embolization alone showed a stable hematoma size (13.3±5.7 mm to 10.0±8.8 mm, p=0.20). Recurrence or increase in hematoma size requiring surgical evacuation occurred in 2/13 (15.4%) patients, one of whom received only unilateral embolization, and the other received partial coiling due to the presence of dangerous collaterals.
MMA embolization is a safe procedure that may reduce recurrence rates of cSDH when used as an adjunct to surgery or as a sole treatment. Possible reasons for treatment failure may include unilateral embolization, partial coiling, and absence of distal penetration of embolic agent. Large randomized control trials are currently in progress to assess the safety and efficacy of MMA embolization for this purpose.
评估脑膜中动脉(MMA)栓塞术治疗慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDH)后的复发率、手术效果及患者预后。
回顾性病例系列研究。
澳大利亚悉尼的两家三级神经外科转诊中心。
13例成年患者(平均年龄±标准差,68.5±9.5岁,11例男性),共17个cSDH(大小为13.8±4.5毫米),单独接受MMA栓塞术(8/13)或联合手术清除血肿(5/13)治疗cSDH。无排除标准。
通过股动脉穿刺进行栓塞,使用液体栓塞剂、聚乙烯醇颗粒、弹簧圈或联合使用多种栓塞剂。栓塞术可作为唯一治疗方法或与手术清除血肿联合使用。
主要结局为血肿复发或增大需要手术清除。次要结局包括手术并发症、随访时血肿大小及患者临床结局。
未发生手术并发症。12例患者出院时神经功能正常,1例因严重残疾出院后入住老年护理机构。随访时(平均=8.7周),联合栓塞术与手术清除血肿使血肿大小减小(从14.3±2.6毫米减至5.7±6.5毫米,p<0.01),而单纯栓塞术血肿大小无变化(从13.3±5.7毫米至10.0±8.8毫米,p=0.20)。2/13(15.4%)的患者出现血肿复发或增大需要手术清除,其中1例仅接受了单侧栓塞,另1例因存在危险侧支循环接受了部分弹簧圈栓塞。
MMA栓塞术是一种安全的手术,作为手术辅助手段或单独治疗方法使用时,可能降低cSDH的复发率。治疗失败的可能原因包括单侧栓塞、部分弹簧圈栓塞及栓塞剂未穿透远端。目前正在进行大型随机对照试验以评估MMA栓塞术在此方面的安全性和有效性。