Prochnow F H O, Weber K R, Rezende C E E, Kaizer M R, Gonzaga C C
School of Health Sciences, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba , PR, Brasil.
Centre for Rural Dentistry and Oral Health, Charles Sturt University, Orange NSW, Australia.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2025 May 28;33(2):199-205. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2799Prochnow07.
This study evaluated the microshear bond strength between resin cement and three translucent zirconias (3Y-PSZ, 4Y-PSZ, and 5Y-PSZ) following air abrasion with aluminum oxide (Al2O3) or tribochemical silica coating (CoJet), before and after thermal cycling. 3Y-TZP was included as a control.
Zirconia specimens were treated with air abrasion or CoJet, followed by the application of a zirconia primer and adhesive. Dual-cured resin cement cylinders were then bonded to the treated surfaces for microshear bond strength testing after 7 days in distilled water or after aging (30 days and 10,000 thermal cycles). Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA (zirconia, treatment, and aging) and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).
The triple interaction was not significant. Treatmenttime and zirconiatime interactions were significant (p⟨0.001). 3YTZP exhibited higher bond strength at 7 days. Higher bond strength values were obtained for CoJet and Al2O3 air abrasion groups at 7 days (13.47 ± 3.55 MPa). All specimens presented adhesive failures.
The type of zirconia significantly influenced the microshear bond strength. 3Y-TZP showed greater bond strength compared to translucent zirconias. Tribochemical coating promoted higher bond strength at both time points. Thermal cycling negatively affected the bond strength of all zirconias evaluated.
The observed variations in bond strength among different translucent zirconias emphasize the importance of material selection for optimal clinical outcomes. Additionally, the positive influence of tribochemical silica coating on bond strength highlights its potential as a valuable surface treatment for enhancing the durability of zirconia-based restorations in the oral environment. However, the detrimental effects of thermal cycling on bond strength emphasize the need for careful clinical considerations when fabricating and cementing translucent zirconia restorations.
本研究评估了在热循环前后,用氧化铝(Al2O3)进行空气磨蚀或采用摩擦化学硅涂层(CoJet)处理后,树脂水门汀与三种半透明氧化锆(3Y-PSZ、4Y-PSZ和5Y-PSZ)之间的微剪切粘结强度。纳入3Y-TZP作为对照。
氧化锆试件经空气磨蚀或CoJet处理,随后应用氧化锆底漆和粘结剂。然后将双固化树脂水门汀圆柱体粘结到处理过的表面,在蒸馏水中放置7天或老化(30天和10000次热循环)后进行微剪切粘结强度测试。使用三因素方差分析(氧化锆、处理方式和老化)和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)对数据进行分析。
三因素交互作用不显著。处理方式时间和氧化锆时间的交互作用显著(p⟨0.001)。3Y-TZP在7天时表现出更高的粘结强度。CoJet组和Al2O3空气磨蚀组在7天时获得了更高的粘结强度值(13.47 ± 3.55 MPa)。所有试件均呈现粘结失败。
氧化锆的类型显著影响微剪切粘结强度。与半透明氧化锆相比,3Y-TZP显示出更高的粘结强度。摩擦化学涂层在两个时间点均促进了更高的粘结强度。热循环对所有评估的氧化锆的粘结强度产生了负面影响。
不同半透明氧化锆之间观察到的粘结强度差异强调了材料选择对实现最佳临床效果的重要性。此外,摩擦化学硅涂层对粘结强度的积极影响突出了其作为一种有价值的表面处理方法的潜力,可增强口腔环境中氧化锆基修复体的耐久性。然而,热循环对粘结强度的不利影响强调了在制作和粘结半透明氧化锆修复体时需要谨慎考虑临床因素。