Silver H K, Connors J M, Salinas F A
Cancer Treat Rep. 1985 Jul-Aug;69(7-8):743-50.
It is unclear from preliminary laboratory studies whether a high- or a low-dose interferon treatment strategy is optimal. As part of an ongoing study of mechanisms of interferon action, we have evaluated toxicity in a two-arm protocol in which patients were randomly assigned to receive lymphoblastoid interferon by either a low-dose treatment strategy (2 X 10(6) units/m2 daily X 28 days then daily X 5 days every other week by im injection) or a high-dose treatment strategy (5 X 10(6) units/m2 by continuous iv infusion over 24 hours, escalating by 5 X 10(6) units/m2/day as tolerated over 10 days, repeated every 28 days). The main toxic effects in both arms were fever, fatigue, and anorexia. Marked interpatient differences within each dose arm were greater than differences between arms. Additional significant toxic effects included nausea and vomiting, hypotension, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and evidence of hepatic toxicity. Minor changes in serum electrolytes were noted. Coagulation studies were normal. The dose-limiting toxic effect for the high-dose arm was myelosuppression. Median maximum tolerated dose among high-dose strategy patients was 18 X 10(6) units/m2, but there was marked interpatient variation. We conclude that both dose schedules were relatively well-tolerated. Because of individual variation in tolerance, high-dose treatment should include a dose escalation strategy.
从初步的实验室研究尚不清楚高剂量或低剂量干扰素治疗策略是否为最佳方案。作为正在进行的干扰素作用机制研究的一部分,我们在一项双臂方案中评估了毒性,该方案中患者被随机分配接受淋巴母细胞干扰素治疗,治疗策略分为低剂量(每日2×10⁶单位/m²,共28天,然后每隔一周每日一次,每次5天,皮下注射)或高剂量(24小时持续静脉输注5×10⁶单位/m²,根据耐受情况每天增加5×10⁶单位/m²,持续10天,每28天重复一次)。两组的主要毒性反应为发热、疲劳和厌食。每个剂量组内患者间的显著差异大于组间差异。其他显著的毒性反应包括恶心、呕吐、低血压、白细胞减少、血小板减少以及肝毒性证据。血清电解质有轻微变化。凝血研究正常。高剂量组的剂量限制性毒性反应为骨髓抑制。高剂量策略患者的最大耐受剂量中位数为18×10⁶单位/m²,但患者间存在显著差异。我们得出结论,两种剂量方案的耐受性都相对较好。由于个体耐受性存在差异,高剂量治疗应包括剂量递增策略。