Suppr超能文献

比较0.55T牙科专用磁共振成像系统与1.5T系统在颞下颌关节主观图像质量评估和评分者一致性方面的表现。

Comparison of a 0.55 T dental-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging system with a 1.5 T system in evaluation of the temporomandibular joint regarding subjective image quality assessment and rater agreement.

作者信息

Nixdorf Donald R, Greiser Andreas, Hayes Carmel, Gaalaas Laurence, Groenke Beth R, Fuglsig João Marcus de Carvalho E Silva, Johannsen Katrine Mølgaard, Herman Cory R, Kaimal Shanti, Moana-Filho Estephan J, Mulet Mariona, Özütemiz Can, Spin-Neto Rubens

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic & Biological Sciences, School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Radiology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2025 Jul;140(1):113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2025.02.011. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare subjective assessment of image quality and rater agreement of magnetic resonance (MR) images of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) acquired with dental-dedicated 0.55 T and clinical 1.5 T magnetic field strengths.

STUDY DESIGN

Six blinded raters evaluated randomized TMJ MR images from 5 healthy participants imaged with 3 pulse sequences on 2 scanners: a 0.55 T system using a custom-built surface coil for dental-dedicated applications and a clinical 1.5 T system using a standard head/neck coil. TMJ anatomy and image quality parameters were assessed using a three-point scale (0 = unacceptable, 1 = acceptable, and 2 = excellent). Data was pooled across participants, pulse sequences, and sides. Kappa coefficients were calculated for intra- and inter-rater agreement. Chi-square tests were applied to explore differences between scanners. Significance was established at P<0.05.

RESULTS

Four different raters preferred 0.55 T images for visualizing hard and/or soft tissue anatomy (P≤.02). One rater preferred the 0.55 T system regarding contrast. No other differences were detected regarding qualitative ratings. Kappa values for intra-rater agreement ranged from 0.49 to 0.70 for 0.55 T images and 0.42 to 0.71 for 1.5 T images. Inter-rater kappa values ranged from 0.02 to 0.29 for 0.55 T images and 0.02 to 0.23 for 1.5 T images.

CONCLUSIONS

Images from the two systems were rated similarly. Further research is needed to assess diagnostic performance in patients.

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较使用牙科专用0.55T和临床1.5T磁场强度获取的颞下颌关节(TMJ)磁共振(MR)图像的图像质量主观评估和评分者一致性。

研究设计

六名不知情的评分者对5名健康参与者的随机TMJ MR图像进行评估,这些图像在2台扫描仪上使用3种脉冲序列成像:一台0.55T系统,使用定制表面线圈用于牙科专用应用;一台临床1.5T系统,使用标准头/颈线圈。使用三点量表(0 = 不可接受,1 = 可接受,2 = 优秀)评估TMJ解剖结构和图像质量参数。数据汇总来自参与者、脉冲序列和两侧。计算评分者内部和评分者之间一致性的kappa系数。应用卡方检验探索扫描仪之间的差异。显著性设定为P<0.05。

结果

四名不同的评分者更喜欢0.55T图像用于可视化硬组织和/或软组织解剖结构(P≤0.02)。一名评分者在对比度方面更喜欢0.55T系统。在定性评分方面未检测到其他差异。0.55T图像的评分者内部一致性kappa值范围为0.49至0.70,1.5T图像的范围为0.42至0.71。0.55T图像的评分者间kappa值范围为0.02至0.29,1.5T图像的范围为0.02至0.23。

结论

两个系统的图像评分相似。需要进一步研究评估患者的诊断性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验