Gonnah Ahmed, Darke Nadhrah, Mullen Liam, Hung John, Sandhu Kully, Giblett Joel P
School of Medicine, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK.
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital Liverpool, UK.
Interv Cardiol. 2025 Mar 21;20:e10. doi: 10.15420/icr.2024.39. eCollection 2025.
Acute MI (AMI) is a leading cause of mortality globally. Swift diagnosis is imperative, with timely reperfusion crucial to minimise adverse outcomes. Revascularisation strategies include culprit-vessel-only therapy, staged complete revascularisation or immediate complete revascularisation. Evidence from randomised trials strongly favours complete revascularisation in ST-elevation MI (STEMI). Data regarding immediate complete revascularisation compared to a staged approach are limited, with uncertainties regarding the advantages of physiology-guided treatment compared to angiographic assessment alone. Non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients with multivessel disease are often complex and current guidelines offer limited recommendations for this patient group, emphasising the need for individualised treatment. Observational studies have sought to find the optimal approach, yet conflicting data prevails. Dedicated trials for this issue in NSTEMI patients are currently unavailable. To enhance the decision-making processes for patients with AMI, future trials should consider the inclusion of functional health status and health-related quality of life outcomes. The existing gaps in knowledge underscore the intricacies of managing AMI and the ongoing necessity for comprehensive research to refine treatment strategies.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)是全球主要的死亡原因之一。快速诊断至关重要,及时再灌注对于将不良后果降至最低至关重要。血运重建策略包括仅对罪犯血管进行治疗、分期完全血运重建或立即完全血运重建。随机试验的证据强烈支持ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的完全血运重建。与分期方法相比,关于立即完全血运重建的数据有限,与仅进行血管造影评估相比,生理指导治疗的优势存在不确定性。患有多支血管病变的非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者通常情况复杂,目前的指南对此患者群体的建议有限,强调需要个体化治疗。观察性研究试图找到最佳方法,但相互矛盾的数据仍然存在。目前尚无针对NSTEMI患者此问题的专门试验。为了加强AMI患者的决策过程,未来的试验应考虑纳入功能健康状况和与健康相关的生活质量结果。现有的知识空白凸显了管理AMI的复杂性以及持续进行全面研究以完善治疗策略的必要性。