Matsumoto Masatomo, Maemichi Toshihiro, Wada Mitsunari, Niwa Yuki, Inagaki Shinobu, Taguchi Atsuya, Okunuki Takumi, Tanaka Hirofumi, Ichikawa Shota, Kumai Tsukasa
Graduate School of Sport Sciences, Waseda University: 2-579-15 Mikajima, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-1192, Japan.
Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Kuwana City Medical Center, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2025 Apr;37(4):145-152. doi: 10.1589/jpts.37.145. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
[Purpose] Morphological changes in the dual-layered structure of the heel fat pad under varying loads, differences between the dominant and non-dominant feet, and changes over one month are not understood. This study aimed to examine these factors, as understanding normal conditions provides insights into identifying abnormal conditions. [Participants and Methods] Forty healthy Japanese adults (80 feet) participated in this study. The heel fat pad was divided into a macrochamber layer (extending from the calcaneal tuberosity to the fibrous septum, including the macrochambers) and a microchamber layer (extending from the microchambers to the skin). The thickness of each layer in the dominant and non-dominant feet was measured under four conditions: non-load, sitting, 50% load, and 80% load. The compressibility indices were calculated and compared. The same investigations were performed one month later. [Results] Changes in thickness from non-load to 80% load mainly occurred in the macrochamber layer (compressibility index=0.40), with minimal changes observed in the microchamber layer (compressibility index=0.76). No significant differences were observed, although a difference of a few millimeters was observed. Similar results were obtained in the second examination, which was conducted after one month. [Conclusion] These results likely represent the morphological changes in the normal heel fat pad under varying loads.
[目的] 目前尚不清楚足跟脂肪垫双层结构在不同负荷下的形态变化、优势足与非优势足之间的差异以及一个月内的变化情况。本研究旨在探讨这些因素,因为了解正常情况有助于识别异常情况。[参与者与方法] 40名健康的日本成年人(80只脚)参与了本研究。足跟脂肪垫被分为大腔室层(从跟骨结节延伸至纤维间隔,包括大腔室)和微腔室层(从微腔室延伸至皮肤)。在非负重、坐姿、50%负荷和80%负荷这四种条件下,测量优势足和非优势足各层的厚度。计算并比较压缩指数。一个月后进行相同的检查。[结果] 从非负重到80%负荷时,厚度变化主要发生在大腔室层(压缩指数 = 0.40),微腔室层变化极小(压缩指数 = 0.76)。尽管观察到有几毫米的差异,但未发现显著差异。在一个月后进行的第二次检查中也得到了类似结果。[结论] 这些结果可能代表了正常足跟脂肪垫在不同负荷下的形态变化。