• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术对比:RHEIA试验

Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in women: the RHEIA trial.

作者信息

Tchetche Didier, Pibarot Philippe, Bax Jeroen J, Bonaros Nikolaos, Windecker Stephan, Dumonteil Nicolas, Nietlispach Fabian, Messika-Zeitoun David, Pocock Stuart J, Berthoumieu Pierre, Swaans Martin J, Timmers Leo, Rudolph Tanja Katharina, Bleiziffer Sabine, Leroux Lionel, Modine Thomas, van der Kley Frank, Auffret Vincent, Tomasi Jacques, Stastny Lukas, Hengstenberg Christian, Andreas Martin, Leclercq Florence, Gandet Thomas, Mascherbauer Julia, Trescher Karola, Prendergast Bernard, Vasa-Nicotera Mariuca, Chieffo Alaide, Mares Jan, Wesselink Wilbert, Rakova Radka, Kurucova Jana, Bramlage Peter, Eltchaninoff Helene

机构信息

Groupe Cardiovasculaire Interventionnel, Clinique Pasteur, 45 avenue de Lombez, 31076 Toulouse Cedex 3, France.

Department of Cardiology, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2025 Jun 9;46(22):2079-2088. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf133.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf133
PMID:40171878
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis have more complications than men when undergoing surgical valve replacement, they are under-represented in clinical trials. The Randomized researcH in womEn all comers wIth Aortic stenosis (RHEIA) trial investigates the balance of benefits and risks of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. surgery in women.

METHODS

Women were randomized 1:1 to transfemoral TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve or surgery. The primary composite endpoint was death, stroke, or (valve, procedure or heart failure related) rehospitalization at 1 year. Non-inferiority testing with a pre-specified 6% margin and superiority testing were performed in the as-treated population.

RESULTS

At 48 European centres, 443 women underwent randomization, and 420 were treated as randomized. Mean age was 73 years, and the mean estimated surgical risk of death was 2.1% (Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the primary endpoint event rates at 1 year were 8.9% in the TAVI and 15.6% in the surgery group. This difference of -6.8% with an upper 95% confidence limit of -1.5% demonstrated the non-inferiority of TAVI (P < .001). The two-sided 95% confidence interval of -13.0% to -.5% further resulted in superiority (P = .034). The 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint components was: .9% with TAVI vs. 2.0% with surgery for death from any cause, 3.3% vs. 3.0% for stroke, and 5.8% vs. 11.4% for rehospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Among women with severe aortic stenosis, the incidence of the composite of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at 1 year was lower with TAVI than with surgery.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT04160130.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管有严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的女性在接受外科瓣膜置换术时比男性有更多并发症,但她们在临床试验中的代表性不足。女性主动脉瓣狭窄全人群随机研究(RHEIA)试验调查了经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)与外科手术在女性中的获益与风险平衡。

方法

女性按1:1随机分为接受球囊扩张瓣膜经股动脉TAVI组或外科手术组。主要复合终点为1年时的死亡、卒中或(瓣膜、手术或心力衰竭相关)再次住院。在接受治疗的人群中进行了预先设定6%界值的非劣效性检验和优效性检验。

结果

在48个欧洲中心,443名女性接受了随机分组,420名按随机分组接受了治疗。平均年龄为73岁,平均估计手术死亡风险为2.1%(胸外科医师协会风险评分)。TAVI组1年时主要终点事件率的Kaplan-Meier估计值为8.9%,手术组为15.6%。-6.8%的差异,95%置信上限为-1.5%,证明了TAVI的非劣效性(P <.001)。-13.0%至-.5%的双侧95%置信区间进一步显示了优效性(P =.034)。主要终点各组成部分的1年发生率为:任何原因导致的死亡,TAVI组为.9%,手术组为2.0%;卒中,TAVI组为3.3%,手术组为3.0%;再次住院,TAVI组为5.8%,手术组为11.4%。

结论

在有严重主动脉瓣狭窄的女性中,TAVI组1年时死亡、卒中或再次住院的复合发生率低于手术组。

临床试验注册号

NCT04160130。

相似文献

1
Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in women: the RHEIA trial.女性经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术对比:RHEIA试验
Eur Heart J. 2025 Jun 9;46(22):2079-2088. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf133.
2
SAPIEN 3 versus Myval transcatheter heart valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (COMPARE-TAVI 1): a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial.经导管主动脉瓣植入术使用SAPIEN 3与Myval经导管心脏瓣膜对比研究(COMPARE-TAVI 1):一项多中心、随机、非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2025 Apr 19;405(10487):1362-1372. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00106-0. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
3
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.低至中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术纵向比较的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
4
5-Year Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.低风险患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的5年超声心动图结果
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jun;18(6):625-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.01.015. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
5
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in high surgical risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危外科手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196877. eCollection 2018.
6
Valve in valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) versus redo-Surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR): A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置入术(ViV-TAVI)中的瓣中瓣技术与再次外科主动脉瓣置换术(redo-SAVR):一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Oct;31(5):661-671. doi: 10.1111/joic.12520. Epub 2018 May 20.
7
Rationale and Design of the REPEAT Trial: A Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.重复试验的原理与设计:一项比较再次手术主动脉瓣置换术与经导管主动脉瓣置入术(瓣中瓣)的多中心随机试验。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 20;14(10):e040954. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.040954. Epub 2025 May 15.
8
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing 3 Aortic Valve Interventions: The THIRD Multicenter Registry.接受3种主动脉瓣干预治疗患者的临床特征与结局:THIRD多中心注册研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan 13;18(1):103-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.037.
9
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cerebrovascular event incidence after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后脑血管事件发生率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Aug;111(8):843-858. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-01997-1. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Single- Versus Dual-Access Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using Balloon-Expandable Platform: A Propensity Score Matching Study.使用球囊扩张平台的单入路与双入路经导管主动脉瓣植入术:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
JACC Adv. 2025 Aug 21;4(9):102086. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102086.
2
Understanding Aortic Stenosis and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Women.了解女性主动脉瓣狭窄及经导管主动脉瓣置换术
Struct Heart. 2025 May 30;9(7):100666. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100666. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Aortic Stenosis: Time for a Sex-Based Approach?
主动脉瓣狭窄:是时候采用基于性别的方法了吗?
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2691. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082691.