Bross Tanja, Frenzel Anne Christiane, Nett Ulrike Elisabeth
University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2025 Sep;95 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S256-S280. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12765. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
In their daily work life, teachers experience various situations in which they need to regulate their emotions. Possible factors that influence the use of different emotion regulation strategies include the emotions and context experienced. Previous research mainly investigated teachers' emotion regulation at a single strategy level without considering multiple strategies use, emotions, situational aspects and well-being.
This study aimed to explore teachers' emotion regulation in their daily work life. Furthermore, we examined their emotions, specific situations and well-being linked to regulation behaviour.
In total, 165 teachers (mean age 43.31 years; 83.6% female) participated in a diary study for two weeks.
We assessed eight emotion regulation strategies, joy and anger, the valence and context of the situation and emotional exhaustion. The data were analysed using multilevel latent profile analyses.
We found different combinations of emotion regulation strategy use at the situational level (Level 1) and the person-level (Level 2). At the person-level, only a few teachers (17.4%) were able to flexibly apply different strategies in different situations, while most teachers regulated their emotions predominantly with a specific set of strategies. Experiencing joy, as well as the valence and the context of the situation, mattered for emotion regulation at the situational level. Emotional exhaustion at the person-level was not linked to profile probability.
The findings highlight the complexity of teachers' emotion regulation, revealing diverse regulation patterns and profiles influenced by emotions and situational factors, while underscoring the limited flexibility in strategy use among most teachers.
在日常工作生活中,教师会遇到各种需要调节情绪的情况。影响不同情绪调节策略使用的可能因素包括所经历的情绪和情境。以往的研究主要在单一策略层面调查教师的情绪调节,而没有考虑多种策略的使用、情绪、情境因素和幸福感。
本研究旨在探讨教师在日常工作生活中的情绪调节。此外,我们还考察了他们的情绪、具体情境以及与调节行为相关的幸福感。
共有165名教师(平均年龄43.31岁;83.6%为女性)参与了为期两周的日记研究。
我们评估了八种情绪调节策略、喜悦和愤怒、情境的效价和背景以及情绪耗竭。数据采用多层次潜在剖面分析进行分析。
我们在情境层面(第1层)和个体层面(第2层)发现了情绪调节策略使用的不同组合。在个体层面,只有少数教师(17.4%)能够在不同情境中灵活运用不同策略,而大多数教师主要用特定的一组策略来调节情绪。体验到喜悦以及情境的效价和背景,对情境层面的情绪调节很重要。个体层面的情绪耗竭与剖面概率无关。
研究结果凸显了教师情绪调节的复杂性,揭示了受情绪和情境因素影响的多种调节模式和剖面,同时强调了大多数教师在策略使用上灵活性有限。